Re: [Django] #16568: require_debug_false does not work as intended (backward incompatible)

#16568: require_debug_false does not work as intended (backward incompatible) -+ Reporter: andreas_pelme|Owner: nobody Type: Bug | Status: closed

Re: [Django] #16568: require_debug_false does not work as intended (backward incompatible)

#16568: require_debug_false does not work as intended (backward incompatible) -+ Reporter: andreas_pelme|Owner: nobody Type: Bug | Status: new Component:

Re: [Django] #16568: require_debug_false does not work as intended (backward incompatible)

#16568: require_debug_false does not work as intended (backward incompatible) -+ Reporter: andreas_pelme|Owner: nobody Type: Bug | Status: new Component:

Re: [Django] #20566: Store previous string in po files

#20566: Store previous string in po files --+ Reporter: nijel |Owner: nobody Type: New feature | Status: new Component:

Re: [Django] #20569: Add cleaned_form to supersede cleaned_data

#20569: Add cleaned_form to supersede cleaned_data ---+-- Reporter: anonymous |Owner: nobody Type: Uncategorized | Status: new Component: Forms |

Re: [Django] #11294: Django administration Model list always shows Decimal with decimal places

#11294: Django administration Model list always shows Decimal with decimal places ---+ Reporter: jason@…|Owner: nobody Type: Bug| Status: new Component:

Re: [Django] #11294: Django administration Model list always shows Decimal with decimal places

#11294: Django administration Model list always shows Decimal with decimal places ---+ Reporter: jason@…|Owner: nobody Type: Bug| Status: new Component:

Re: [Django] #20546: New model – ApproximateDateField

#20546: New model – ApproximateDateField -+- Reporter: vericule@… |Owner: nobody Type: New feature | Status: closed Component: Database layer

Re: [Django] #20546: New model – ApproximateDateField

#20546: New model – ApproximateDateField -+- Reporter: vericule@… |Owner: nobody Type: New feature | Status: new Component: Database layer |

Re: [Django] #20086: UserCreationForm does not support custom models.

#20086: UserCreationForm does not support custom models. --+-- Reporter: efrinut@… |Owner: nobody Type: Bug | Status: new Component: contrib.auth |

Re: [Django] #20568: templatetag truncatewords_html split words on special caracters

#20568: templatetag truncatewords_html split words on special caracters ---+-- Reporter: yann0@…|Owner: nobody Type: Bug| Status: closed Component: Utilities |

Re: [Django] #20570: HttpRequest.REQUEST is still mentioned in the documentation

#20570: HttpRequest.REQUEST is still mentioned in the documentation -+- Reporter: jeff.revesz@…|Owner: nobody Type: | Status: closed

Re: [Django] #20570: HttpRequest.REQUEST is still mentioned in the documentation

#20570: HttpRequest.REQUEST is still mentioned in the documentation -+- Reporter: jeff.revesz@…|Owner: nobody Type: | Status: closed

Re: [Django] #20570: HttpRequest.REQUEST is still mentioned in the documentation

#20570: HttpRequest.REQUEST is still mentioned in the documentation -+- Reporter: jeff.revesz@…|Owner: nobody Type: | Status: closed

Re: [Django] #20570: HttpRequest.REQUEST is still mentioned in the documentation

#20570: HttpRequest.REQUEST is still mentioned in the documentation -+- Reporter: jeff.revesz@…|Owner: nobody Type: | Status: closed

[Django] #20570: HttpRequest.REQUEST is still mentioned in the documentation

#20570: HttpRequest.REQUEST is still mentioned in the documentation --+ Reporter: jeff.revesz@… | Owner: nobody Type: Cleanup/optimization | Status: new Component: Documentation |Version:

Re: [Django] #20569: Add cleaned_form to supersede cleaned_data

#20569: Add cleaned_form to supersede cleaned_data ---+-- Reporter: anonymous |Owner: nobody Type: Uncategorized | Status: new Component: Forms |

[Django] #20569: Add cleaned_form to supersede cleaned_data

#20569: Add cleaned_form to supersede cleaned_data ---+ Reporter: anonymous | Owner: nobody Type: Uncategorized | Status: new Component: Forms |Version: master Severity: Normal |

Re: [Django] #20569: Add cleaned_form to supersede cleaned_data

#20569: Add cleaned_form to supersede cleaned_data ---+-- Reporter: anonymous |Owner: nobody Type: Uncategorized | Status: new Component: Forms |

Re: [Django] #20567: Document BoundField.id_for_label and how to set the 'id' of a widget (was: Documenting form widget initial attrs)

#20567: Document BoundField.id_for_label and how to set the 'id' of a widget --+ Reporter: littlepig |Owner: timo Type: Cleanup/optimization | Status:

Re: [Django] #20564: Querying (exclude) on a GenericRelation's DateTimeField through a related object fails

#20564: Querying (exclude) on a GenericRelation's DateTimeField through a related object fails -+- Reporter: nferrari |Owner: nobody Type: Bug |

[Django] #20568: templatetag truncatewords_html split words on special caracters

#20568: templatetag truncatewords_html split words on special caracters + Reporter: yann0@… | Owner: nobody Type: Bug | Status: new Component: Utilities |Version: 1.3 Severity: Normal |

Re: [Django] #6785: QuerySet.get() should only attempt to fetch a limited number of rows (was: QuerySet.get(), nit-pick / optimize)

#6785: QuerySet.get() should only attempt to fetch a limited number of rows -+- Reporter: deadwisdom |Owner: nobody Type: | Status: closed

Re: [Django] #19875: Tutorial should have include ALLOWED_HOSTS setting

#19875: Tutorial should have include ALLOWED_HOSTS setting -+- Reporter: anonymous|Owner: nobody Type: | Status: new

Re: [Django] #20434: Have a template tag grammar instead of handling token/parser for every tag, and make it possible to introspect the grammar.

#20434: Have a template tag grammar instead of handling token/parser for every tag, and make it possible to introspect the grammar. -+- Reporter: jonathanslenders |Owner: Type: New

Re: [Django] #20567: Documenting form widget initial attrs

#20567: Documenting form widget initial attrs --+ Reporter: littlepig |Owner: timo Type: Cleanup/optimization | Status: assigned Component:

[django/django] 80b151: Bumped verion numbers for 1.6a1.

Branch: refs/heads/master Home: https://github.com/django/django Commit: 80b15113112d7852bc262af47c18cd02ff904492 https://github.com/django/django/commit/80b15113112d7852bc262af47c18cd02ff904492 Author: Jacob Kaplan-Moss Date: 2013-06-06 (Thu, 06 Jun 2013)

Re: [Django] #12856: Decide on public API/documentation for form.BoundField attributes

#12856: Decide on public API/documentation for form.BoundField attributes -+- Reporter: mnbayazit|Owner: nobody Type: | Status: new

Re: [Django] #20564: Querying (exclude) on a GenericRelation's DateTimeField through a related object fails

#20564: Querying (exclude) on a GenericRelation's DateTimeField through a related object fails -+- Reporter: nferrari |Owner: nobody Type: Bug |

Re: [Django] #19875: Tutorial should have include ALLOWED_HOSTS setting

#19875: Tutorial should have include ALLOWED_HOSTS setting -+- Reporter: anonymous|Owner: nobody Type: | Status: new

Re: [Django] #20566: Store previous string in po files

#20566: Store previous string in po files --+ Reporter: nijel |Owner: nobody Type: New feature | Status: new Component:

Re: [Django] #20564: Querying (exclude) on a GenericRelation's DateTimeField through a related object fails

#20564: Querying (exclude) on a GenericRelation's DateTimeField through a related object fails -+- Reporter: nferrari |Owner: nobody Type: Bug |

Re: [Django] #20564: Querying (exclude) on a GenericRelation's DateTimeField through a related object fails

#20564: Querying (exclude) on a GenericRelation's DateTimeField through a related object fails -+- Reporter: nferrari |Owner: nobody Type: Bug |

Re: [Django] #20564: Querying (exclude) on a GenericRelation's DateTimeField through a related object fails

#20564: Querying (exclude) on a GenericRelation's DateTimeField through a related object fails -+- Reporter: nferrari |Owner: nobody Type: Bug |

Re: [Django] #20429: Add QuerySet.update_or_create method (was: Implementation of update_or_create)

#20429: Add QuerySet.update_or_create method -+- Reporter: tunixman |Owner: Type: New feature | elektrrrus Component: Database layer |

Re: [Django] #20564: Querying (exclude) on a GenericRelation's DateTimeField through a related object fails

#20564: Querying (exclude) on a GenericRelation's DateTimeField through a related object fails -+- Reporter: nferrari |Owner: nobody Type: Bug |

Re: [Django] #20565: Generic view descriptions should give template examples

#20565: Generic view descriptions should give template examples -+ Reporter: david.reitter@… |Owner: batisteo Type: New feature | Status: assigned Component:

Re: [Django] #20562: Docs: How to use django ORM with multiprocessing

#20562: Docs: How to use django ORM with multiprocessing ---+ Reporter: guettli|Owner: nobody Type: Uncategorized | Status: new Component: Documentation |

[django/django] e2518f: Fixed #12337 - Honor ModelForm.Meta.exclude when s...

Branch: refs/heads/master Home: https://github.com/django/django Commit: e2518fdf46a687454066b8a75263c9019b1e965d https://github.com/django/django/commit/e2518fdf46a687454066b8a75263c9019b1e965d Author: Stephen Burrows Date: 2013-06-06 (Thu, 06

Re: [Django] #12337: save_m2m() does not honor save_instance's exclude argument

#12337: save_m2m() does not honor save_instance's exclude argument + Reporter: margieroginski |Owner: melinath Type: Bug | Status: closed Component: Forms

Re: [Django] #20483: Reduce the set of apps seen by individual tests

#20483: Reduce the set of apps seen by individual tests --+ Reporter: akaariai |Owner: nobody Type: Cleanup/optimization | Status: new Component:

Re: [Django] #20564: Querying (exclude) on a GenericRelation's DateTimeField through a related object fails

#20564: Querying (exclude) on a GenericRelation's DateTimeField through a related object fails -+- Reporter: nferrari |Owner: nobody Type: Bug |

Re: [Django] #20564: Querying (exclude) on a GenericRelation's DateTimeField through a related object fails

#20564: Querying (exclude) on a GenericRelation's DateTimeField through a related object fails -+- Reporter: nferrari |Owner: nobody Type: Bug |

Re: [Django] #16855: select_related doesn't chain as expected

#16855: select_related doesn't chain as expected -+- Reporter: Leo |Owner: nobody Type: Bug | Status: new Component: Database layer

Re: [Django] #16855: select_related doesn't chain as expected

#16855: select_related doesn't chain as expected -+- Reporter: Leo |Owner: nobody Type: Bug | Status: new Component: Database layer

Re: [Django] #20502: AppResolutionOrderI18NTests fails if 'de' locale cached by previous test

#20502: AppResolutionOrderI18NTests fails if 'de' locale cached by previous test ---+ Reporter: gcc|Owner: claudep Type: Bug| Status: closed

[django/django] b67f2a: Fixed #20502 (again) -- More i18n cache flush in t...

Branch: refs/heads/master Home: https://github.com/django/django Commit: b67f2ac8e6f8cdef237590ffb2c85fc30454ba75 https://github.com/django/django/commit/b67f2ac8e6f8cdef237590ffb2c85fc30454ba75 Author: Claude Paroz Date: 2013-06-06 (Thu, 06 Jun 2013)

Re: [Django] #20564: Querying (exclude) on a GenericRelation's DateTimeField through a related object fails

#20564: Querying (exclude) on a GenericRelation's DateTimeField through a related object fails -+- Reporter: nferrari |Owner: nobody Type: Bug |

Re: [Django] #20566: Store previous string in po files

#20566: Store previous string in po files --+ Reporter: nijel |Owner: nobody Type: New feature | Status: new Component:

Re: [Django] #19875: Tutorial should have include ALLOWED_HOSTS setting

#19875: Tutorial should have include ALLOWED_HOSTS setting -+- Reporter: anonymous|Owner: nobody Type: | Status: new

Re: [Django] #20122: Pluralize filter sometimes returns singular form instead of an empty string for invalid inputs

#20122: Pluralize filter sometimes returns singular form instead of an empty string for invalid inputs -+- Reporter: aaugustin|Owner: littlepig Type: |

Re: [Django] #20550: Add an option to preserve the database between test runs

#20550: Add an option to preserve the database between test runs ---+-- Reporter: aaugustin |Owner: nobody Type: New feature| Status: new Component:

[Django] #20567: Documenting form widget initial attrs

#20567: Documenting form widget initial attrs --+ Reporter: littlepig | Owner: nobody Type: Cleanup/optimization | Status: new Component: Documentation |Version: 1.5 Severity:

Re: [Django] #20434: Have a template tag grammar instead of handling token/parser for every tag, and make it possible to introspect the grammar.

#20434: Have a template tag grammar instead of handling token/parser for every tag, and make it possible to introspect the grammar. -+- Reporter: jonathanslenders |Owner: Type: New

Re: [Django] #20434: Have a template tag grammar instead of handling token/parser for every tag, and make it possible to introspect the grammar.

#20434: Have a template tag grammar instead of handling token/parser for every tag, and make it possible to introspect the grammar. -+- Reporter: jonathanslenders |Owner: Type: New

Re: [Django] #19080: ChangeList.get_queryset() automatically applies select_related() in a very "brute" way

#19080: ChangeList.get_queryset() automatically applies select_related() in a very "brute" way --+ Reporter: bberes|Owner: oinopion Type: Cleanup/optimization |

Re: [Django] #19080: ChangeList.get_queryset() automatically applies select_related() in a very "brute" way

#19080: ChangeList.get_queryset() automatically applies select_related() in a very "brute" way --+ Reporter: bberes|Owner: oinopion Type: Cleanup/optimization |

[django/django] 0fd9f7: Fixed #19080 -- Fine-grained control over select_r...

Branch: refs/heads/master Home: https://github.com/django/django Commit: 0fd9f7c95f748764867dc148a2bacef807466d85 https://github.com/django/django/commit/0fd9f7c95f748764867dc148a2bacef807466d85 Author: Tomek Paczkowski Date: 2013-06-05 (Wed, 05 Jun 2013)

Re: [Django] #20565: Generic view descriptions should give template examples

#20565: Generic view descriptions should give template examples -+ Reporter: david.reitter@… |Owner: nobody Type: New feature | Status: new Component:

Re: [Django] #20562: Docs: How to use django ORM with multiprocessing

#20562: Docs: How to use django ORM with multiprocessing ---+ Reporter: guettli|Owner: nobody Type: Uncategorized | Status: new Component: Documentation |

Re: [Django] #20562: Docs: How to use django ORM with multiprocessing

#20562: Docs: How to use django ORM with multiprocessing ---+-- Reporter: guettli|Owner: nobody Type: Uncategorized | Status: new Component: Documentation |

Re: [Django] #20562: Docs: How to use django ORM with multiprocessing

#20562: Docs: How to use django ORM with multiprocessing ---+ Reporter: guettli|Owner: nobody Type: New feature| Status: new Component: Documentation |

[Django] #20566: Store previous string in po files

#20566: Store previous string in po files --+ Reporter: nijel | Owner: nobody Type: New feature | Status: new Component: Internationalization |Version: 1.5 Severity: Normal

Re: [Django] #20483: Reduce the set of apps seen by individual tests

#20483: Reduce the set of apps seen by individual tests --+ Reporter: akaariai |Owner: nobody Type: Cleanup/optimization | Status: new Component:

Re: [Django] #20434: Have a template tag grammar instead of handling token/parser for every tag, and make it possible to introspect the grammar.

#20434: Have a template tag grammar instead of handling token/parser for every tag, and make it possible to introspect the grammar. -+- Reporter: jonathanslenders |Owner: Type: New

Re: [Django] #16626: login_required attribute in class-based Generic Views

#16626: login_required attribute in class-based Generic Views -+- Reporter: szczav |Owner: nobody Type: New feature | Status: closed Component:

Re: [Django] #20434: Have a template tag grammar instead of handling token/parser for every tag, and make it possible to introspect the grammar.

#20434: Have a template tag grammar instead of handling token/parser for every tag, and make it possible to introspect the grammar. -+- Reporter: jonathanslenders |Owner: Type: New