Re: [Django] #29423: Add reference documentation for Field.value_from_object()

#29423: Add reference documentation for Field.value_from_object() -+- Reporter: rlalik |Owner: nobody Type: | Status: closed

Re: [Django] #29423: Add reference documentation for Field.value_from_object()

#29423: Add reference documentation for Field.value_from_object() -+- Reporter: rlalik |Owner: nobody Type: | Status: closed

Re: [Django] #29123: Changing an IntegerField to a ForeignKey generates incorrectly ordered migration operations if the field is in unique_together

#29123: Changing an IntegerField to a ForeignKey generates incorrectly ordered migration operations if the field is in unique_together + Reporter: Ed Morley |Owner: Jeff Type: Bug |

[Django] #29445: Compute defaults values with using of objects manager

#29445: Compute defaults values with using of objects manager -+- Reporter: Yurii | Owner: nobody Shtrikker | Type: New| Status:

Re: [Django] #29443: Unify registries in Django

#29443: Unify registries in Django -+- Reporter: Johannes Hoppe |Owner: nobody Type: | Status: new Cleanup/optimization |

Re: [Django] #29423: Add reference documentation for Field.value_from_object()

#29423: Add reference documentation for Field.value_from_object() -+- Reporter: rlalik |Owner: nobody Type: | Status: new

Re: [Django] #29442: wrong sql for cast datetime to date in sqlite backend

#29442: wrong sql for cast datetime to date in sqlite backend -+- Reporter: Mauro|Owner: nobody Type: Bug | Status: closed Component:

Re: [Django] #29443: Unify registries in Django

#29443: Unify registries in Django -+- Reporter: Johannes Hoppe |Owner: nobody Type: | Status: new Cleanup/optimization |

Re: [Django] #29444: Allow modification of RETURNING values in django.contrib.postgres

#29444: Allow modification of RETURNING values in django.contrib.postgres -+- Reporter: Johannes Hoppe |Owner: (none) Type: New feature | Status: new

[Django] #29444: Allow modification of RETURNING values in django.contrib.postgres

#29444: Allow modification of RETURNING values in django.contrib.postgres -+- Reporter: Johannes | Owner: (none) Hoppe | Type: New|

Re: [Django] #29400: mark_safe() doesn't work as a decorator for template filters and tags

#29400: mark_safe() doesn't work as a decorator for template filters and tags -+- Reporter: Torsten Bronger |Owner: oliver Type: Bug | Status:

Re: [Django] #29400: mark_safe() doesn't work as a decorator for template filters and tags

#29400: mark_safe() doesn't work as a decorator for template filters and tags -+- Reporter: Torsten Bronger |Owner: oliver Type: Bug | Status:

Re: [Django] #29400: mark_safe() doesn't work as a decorator for template filters and tags

#29400: mark_safe() doesn't work as a decorator for template filters and tags -+- Reporter: Torsten Bronger |Owner: oliver Type: Bug | Status:

Re: [Django] #29400: mark_safe() doesn't work as a decorator for template filters and tags

#29400: mark_safe() doesn't work as a decorator for template filters and tags -+- Reporter: Torsten Bronger |Owner: oliver Type: Bug | Status:

Re: [Django] #29441: Allow dumpdata in YAML using ruamel.yaml rather than PyYaml.

#29441: Allow dumpdata in YAML using ruamel.yaml rather than PyYaml. -+- Reporter: Rémy Hubscher|Owner: nobody Type: | Status: new

Re: [Django] #29443: Unify registries in Django

#29443: Unify registries in Django -+- Reporter: Johannes Hoppe |Owner: nobody Type: | Status: new Cleanup/optimization |

Re: [Django] #29443: Unify registries in Django

#29443: Unify registries in Django -+- Reporter: Johannes Hoppe |Owner: nobody Type: | Status: new Cleanup/optimization |

Re: [Django] #29443: Unify registries in Django

#29443: Unify registries in Django -+- Reporter: Johannes Hoppe |Owner: nobody Type: | Status: new Cleanup/optimization |

[Django] #29443: Unify registries in Django

#29443: Unify registries in Django -+- Reporter: Johannes | Owner: nobody Hoppe | Type: | Status: new Cleanup/optimization

Re: [Django] #29440: Document that RelatedManager.set() doesn't accept bulk keyword argument for many-to-many relations (was: RelatedManager.set() doesn't accept bulk keyword argument for many-to-many

#29440: Document that RelatedManager.set() doesn't accept bulk keyword argument for many-to-many relations ---+ Reporter: Jeremy Lainé |Owner: nobody Type: Bug|

[Django] #29442: wrong sql for cast datetime to date in sqlite backend

#29442: wrong sql for cast datetime to date in sqlite backend -+- Reporter: Mauro | Owner: nobody Type: Bug| Status: new Component: Database

[Django] #29441: Allow dumpdata in YAML using ruamel.yaml rather than PyYaml.

#29441: Allow dumpdata in YAML using ruamel.yaml rather than PyYaml. -+ Reporter: Rémy Hubscher | Owner: nobody Type: Uncategorized | Status: new Component:

Re: [Django] #29440: RelatedManager.set() doesn't accept bulk keyword argument for many-to-many relations

#29440: RelatedManager.set() doesn't accept bulk keyword argument for many-to-many relations -+- Reporter: Jeremy Lainé |Owner: nobody Type: Bug |

[Django] #29440: RelatedManager.set() doesn't accept bulk keyword argument for many-to-many relations

#29440: RelatedManager.set() doesn't accept bulk keyword argument for many-to-many relations -+- Reporter: Jeremy | Owner: nobody Lainé | Type:

Re: [Django] #29429: Make len lookup for ArrayField use the array_length function

#29429: Make len lookup for ArrayField use the array_length function -+- Reporter: creative3000 |Owner: (none) Type: Bug | Status: new