Re: [Django] #31294: Disabled (hidden) inputs don't transmit their data

#31294: Disabled (hidden) inputs don't transmit their data -+- Reporter: berzi|Owner: nobody Type: Bug | Status: new Component:

[Django] #31294: Disabled (hidden) inputs don't transmit their data

#31294: Disabled (hidden) inputs don't transmit their data -+- Reporter: berzi | Owner: nobody Type: Bug| Status: new Component: Forms |

Re: [Django] #31293: MultiPartParser support double quotes

#31293: MultiPartParser support double quotes -+- Reporter: 007 |Owner: 007 Type: | Status: assigned Cleanup/optimization

[Django] #31293: MultiPartParser support double quotes

#31293: MultiPartParser support double quotes + Reporter: 007 | Owner: nobody Type: Cleanup/optimization | Status: new Component: HTTP

Re: [Django] #31150: Subquery annotations are omitted in group by query section if multiple annotation are declared

#31150: Subquery annotations are omitted in group by query section if multiple annotation are declared -+- Reporter: Johannes Hoppe |Owner: nobody Type: Bug |

Re: [Django] #31285: Inherited model doesn't correctly order by "-pk" when specified on Parent.Meta.ordering

#31285: Inherited model doesn't correctly order by "-pk" when specified on Parent.Meta.ordering -+- Reporter: Jon Dufresne |Owner: Jon | Dufresne

Re: [Django] #27807: Overriding username validators doesn't work as documented

#27807: Overriding username validators doesn't work as documented -+- Reporter: johnrork |Owner: nobody Type: Bug | Status: new

[Django] #31292: Calling gdal_full_version() is broken on Python 3

#31292: Calling gdal_full_version() is broken on Python 3 -+ Reporter: Diederik van der Boor | Owner: nobody Type: Bug| Status: new

Re: [Django] #28354: Add a "humanized" widget for DurationField

#28354: Add a "humanized" widget for DurationField -+- Reporter: Nikita Levonovich|Owner: Artem Type: New feature | Status: assigned Component: Forms

Re: [Django] #31150: Subquery annotations are omitted in group by query section if multiple annotation are declared

#31150: Subquery annotations are omitted in group by query section if multiple annotation are declared -+- Reporter: Johannes Hoppe |Owner: nobody Type: Bug |

[Django] #31291: Rename salt to mask in the context of CSRF tokens

#31291: Rename salt to mask in the context of CSRF tokens -+- Reporter: Ram| Owner: Ram Rachum Rachum | Type: | Status:

Re: [Django] #31291: Rename salt to mask in the context of CSRF tokens

#31291: Rename salt to mask in the context of CSRF tokens -+- Reporter: Ram Rachum |Owner: Ram Type: | Rachum Cleanup/optimization |

Re: [Django] #28354: Add a "humanized" widget for DurationField

#28354: Add a "humanized" widget for DurationField -+- Reporter: Nikita Levonovich|Owner: Artem Type: New feature | Status: assigned Component: Forms

Re: [Django] #31150: Subquery annotations are omitted in group by query section if multiple annotation are declared

#31150: Subquery annotations are omitted in group by query section if multiple annotation are declared -+- Reporter: Johannes Hoppe |Owner: nobody Type: Bug |

Re: [Django] #31150: Subquery annotations are omitted in group by query section if multiple annotation are declared

#31150: Subquery annotations are omitted in group by query section if multiple annotation are declared -+- Reporter: Johannes Hoppe |Owner: nobody Type: Bug |

Re: [Django] #31276: Add 'flush' option to only clear non-empty tables

#31276: Add 'flush' option to only clear non-empty tables -+- Reporter: Adam (Chainz)|Owner: jonatron Johnson| Type: |

Re: [Django] #31150: Subquery annotations are omitted in group by query section if multiple annotation are declared

#31150: Subquery annotations are omitted in group by query section if multiple annotation are declared -+- Reporter: Johannes Hoppe |Owner: nobody Type: Bug |

Re: [Django] #31182: Asynchronous Support in 3.0 should clearly state what is and is not supported.

#31182: Asynchronous Support in 3.0 should clearly state what is and is not supported. -+- Reporter: Josh Smeaton |Owner: Adam Type: | (Chainz) Johnson

Re: [Django] #31182: Asynchronous Support in 3.0 should clearly state what is and is not supported.

#31182: Asynchronous Support in 3.0 should clearly state what is and is not supported. -+- Reporter: Josh Smeaton |Owner: Adam Type: | (Chainz) Johnson

Re: [Django] #31185: fields.E310-E311 should take into account UniqueConstraints without conditions.

#31185: fields.E310-E311 should take into account UniqueConstraints without conditions. -+- Reporter: Pavel Garkin |Owner: Ahmad | Abdallah

Re: [Django] #30422: Temporary files do not get deleted on canceled upload request.

#30422: Temporary files do not get deleted on canceled upload request. -+- Reporter: drutalj |Owner: Sanskar | Jaiswal Type: Bug

Re: [Django] #31289: system checks: admin.E002 could provide a hint but doesn't

#31289: system checks: admin.E002 could provide a hint but doesn't -+- Reporter: Keryn Knight |Owner: Sanskar Type: | Jaiswal Cleanup/optimization

Re: [Django] #29205: MultiValueField ignores a required value of a sub field

#29205: MultiValueField ignores a required value of a sub field +--- Reporter: Takayuki Hirai |Owner: David Smith Type: Bug | Status: assigned Component:

Re: [Django] #31182: Asynchronous Support in 3.0 should clearly state what is and is not supported.

#31182: Asynchronous Support in 3.0 should clearly state what is and is not supported. -+- Reporter: Josh Smeaton |Owner: Adam Type: | (Chainz) Johnson

Re: [Django] #31150: Subquery annotations are omitted in group by query section if multiple annotation are declared

#31150: Subquery annotations are omitted in group by query section if multiple annotation are declared -+- Reporter: Johannes Hoppe |Owner: nobody Type: Bug |

Re: [Django] #31150: Subquery annotations are omitted in group by query section if multiple annotation are declared (was: SELECT DISTINCT is not not so distict)

#31150: Subquery annotations are omitted in group by query section if multiple annotation are declared -+- Reporter: Johannes Hoppe |Owner: nobody Type: Bug |

Re: [Django] #31150: SELECT DISTINCT is not not so distict

#31150: SELECT DISTINCT is not not so distict -+- Reporter: Johannes Hoppe |Owner: nobody Type: Bug | Status: new Component: Database layer

Re: [Django] #18437: Incorrect double JOIN when using multiple .filter() calls on the same table

#18437: Incorrect double JOIN when using multiple .filter() calls on the same table -+- Reporter: Diederik van der |Owner: nobody Boor | Type: Bug