Re: [Django] #28478: Make DiscoverRunner skip creating a test database if not needed

#28478: Make DiscoverRunner skip creating a test database if not needed --+ Reporter: Tim Graham|Owner: nobody Type: Cleanup/optimization | Status: new

[Django] #28478: Make DiscoverRunner skip creating a test database if not needed

#28478: Make DiscoverRunner skip creating a test database if not needed + Reporter: Tim Graham| Owner: nobody Type: Cleanup/optimization | Status: new

Re: [Django] #28475: Allow user to skip test database creation per connection

#28475: Allow user to skip test database creation per connection ---+-- Reporter: Harry Moreno |Owner: nobody Type: New feature| Status: new Component:

[Django] #28477: Strip unused annotations from count queries

#28477: Strip unused annotations from count queries -+- Reporter: Tom| Owner: nobody Type: | Status: new Cleanup/optimization |

Re: [Django] #28476: Difficulty getting filter_horizontal to extend to the InlineModelAdmin object in admin?

#28476: Difficulty getting filter_horizontal to extend to the InlineModelAdmin object in admin? -+- Reporter: bbiney1 |Owner: nobody Type: Bug |

[Django] #28476: Difficulty getting filter_horizontal to extend to the InlineModelAdmin object in admin?

#28476: Difficulty getting filter_horizontal to extend to the InlineModelAdmin object in admin? -+- Reporter: bbiney1| Owner: nobody Type: Bug| Status: new

Re: [Django] #28466: Clarify the definition of a lazy relationship in the docs

#28466: Clarify the definition of a lazy relationship in the docs -+- Reporter: Malik A. Rumi|Owner: nobody Type: | Status: closed

Re: [Django] #28466: Clarify the definition of a lazy relationship in the docs

#28466: Clarify the definition of a lazy relationship in the docs -+- Reporter: Malik A. Rumi|Owner: nobody Type: | Status: closed

Re: [Django] #28375: QuerySet.prefetch_related() crashes with KeyError if model uses to_field and string primary key

#28375: QuerySet.prefetch_related() crashes with KeyError if model uses to_field and string primary key -+- Reporter: Maks Y |Owner: Paulo Type: Bug |

Re: [Django] #28476: Difficulty getting filter_horizontal to extend to the InlineModelAdmin object in admin?

#28476: Difficulty getting filter_horizontal to extend to the InlineModelAdmin object in admin? -+- Reporter: |Owner: nobody bbin...@swarthmore.edu | Type:

Re: [Django] #28471: Clarify the documentation about the relationship between model meta "index_together" and "indexes" using Index() classes

#28471: Clarify the documentation about the relationship between model meta "index_together" and "indexes" using Index() classes -+- Reporter: Philippe Ombredanne |Owner: nobody Type:

Re: [Django] #28459: Improve performance of QuerySet

#28459: Improve performance of QuerySet -+- Reporter: Sergey Fedoseev |Owner: nobody Type: | Status: closed Cleanup/optimization

Re: [Django] #22569: lookup_allowed fails to consider dynamic list_filter

#22569: lookup_allowed fails to consider dynamic list_filter -+- Reporter: Keryn Knight |Owner: Simon | Meers Type: Bug |

Re: [Django] #28459: Improve performance of QuerySet

#28459: Improve performance of QuerySet -+- Reporter: Sergey Fedoseev |Owner: nobody Type: | Status: closed Cleanup/optimization

Re: [Django] #28476: Difficulty getting filter_horizontal to extend to the InlineModelAdmin object in admin?

#28476: Difficulty getting filter_horizontal to extend to the InlineModelAdmin object in admin? -+- Reporter: |Owner: nobody bbin...@swarthmore.edu | Type:

Re: [Django] #28462: ModelAdmin.list_editable unusably slow and memory intensive with large datasets

#28462: ModelAdmin.list_editable unusably slow and memory intensive with large datasets ---+ Reporter: Ben Cole |Owner: nobody Type: Bug| Status: new

Re: [Django] #28458: Add ModelMultipleChoiceField.validate_choices()

#28458: Add ModelMultipleChoiceField.validate_choices() ---+ Reporter: Daniel Hahler |Owner: nobody Type: New feature| Status: new Component: Forms |

Re: [Django] #28470: Document additional system requirements for unit tests

#28470: Document additional system requirements for unit tests -+- Reporter: Jeff Poulton|Owner: Jeff Type: | Poulton Cleanup/optimization |

[Django] #28471: Clarify the documentation about the relationship between model meta "index_together" and "indexes" using Index() classes

#28471: Clarify the documentation about the relationship between model meta "index_together" and "indexes" using Index() classes -+- Reporter: Philippe | Owner: nobody Ombredanne

[Django] #28472: Optimize Admin actions JavaScript

#28472: Optimize Admin actions JavaScript -+ Reporter: Adam (Chainz) Johnson | Owner: nobody Type: Cleanup/optimization | Status: new Component:

[Django] #28473: Consider SCRIPT_NAME for SECURE_REDIRECT_EXEMPT setting

#28473: Consider SCRIPT_NAME for SECURE_REDIRECT_EXEMPT setting -+ Reporter: Jonas Haag | Owner: nobody Type: Bug| Status: new Component:

Re: [Django] #28472: Optimize Admin actions JavaScript

#28472: Optimize Admin actions JavaScript -+- Reporter: Adam (Chainz)|Owner: Eloi Johnson| Casals Type: |

Re: [Django] #28471: Clarify the documentation about the relationship between model meta "index_together" and "indexes" using Index() classes

#28471: Clarify the documentation about the relationship between model meta "index_together" and "indexes" using Index() classes -+- Reporter: Philippe Ombredanne |Owner: nobody Type:

Re: [Django] #28468: Template braces within {% with %} are not evaluated

#28468: Template braces within {% with %} are not evaluated -+-- Reporter: Liquid Scorpio |Owner: nobody Type: Uncategorized| Status: new Component: Template

Re: [Django] #28457: A new 'Congrats' page for first time Django installs

#28457: A new 'Congrats' page for first time Django installs --+ Reporter: FlipperPA |Owner: nobody Type: Cleanup/optimization | Status: closed

Re: [Django] #28472: Optimize Admin actions JavaScript

#28472: Optimize Admin actions JavaScript -+- Reporter: Adam (Chainz)|Owner: Eloi Johnson| Casals Type: |

Re: [Django] #28472: Optimize Admin actions JavaScript

#28472: Optimize Admin actions JavaScript -+- Reporter: Adam (Chainz)|Owner: Eloi Johnson| Casals Type: |

[Django] #28474: DurationField does not handle OverflowError if an out of range input is passed

#28474: DurationField does not handle OverflowError if an out of range input is passed -+ Reporter: Vikas | Owner: nobody Type: Uncategorized | Status: new

Re: [Django] #28474: DurationField does not handle OverflowError if an out of range input is passed

#28474: DurationField does not handle OverflowError if an out of range input is passed +-- Reporter: Vikas |Owner: Vikas Type: Bug | Status: assigned Component: Forms |

Re: [Django] #28467: Missing real MultiValueField - MultiValueField is actually a MultiField

#28467: Missing real MultiValueField - MultiValueField is actually a MultiField -+- Reporter: Sven R. Kunze|Owner: nobody Type: | Status: new

Re: [Django] #8408: Add a new meta option: don't do count(*) in admin

#8408: Add a new meta option: don't do count(*) in admin ---+--- Reporter: LI Daobing |Owner: Thomas Chaumeny Type: New feature| Status: new Component:

Re: [Django] #28459: Improve performance of QuerySet

#28459: Improve performance of QuerySet -+- Reporter: Sergey Fedoseev |Owner: nobody Type: | Status: closed Cleanup/optimization

Re: [Django] #28470: Document additional system requirements for unit tests

#28470: Document additional system requirements for unit tests -+- Reporter: Jeff Poulton|Owner: Jeff | Poulton Type: Uncategorized|

Re: [Django] #28467: Missing real MultiValueField - MultiValueField is actually a MultiField

#28467: Missing real MultiValueField - MultiValueField is actually a MultiField -+- Reporter: Sven R. Kunze|Owner: nobody Type: | Status:

Re: [Django] #28468: Template braces within {% include ... with="..." %} are not evaluated (was: Template braces within {% with %} are not evaluated)

#28468: Template braces within {% include ... with="..." %} are not evaluated -+-- Reporter: Liquid Scorpio |Owner: nobody Type: Uncategorized| Status: closed

[Django] #28475: Allow user to skip test database creation per connection

#28475: Allow user to skip test database creation per connection -+ Reporter: Harry Moreno | Owner: nobody Type: Uncategorized | Status: new Component:

Re: [Django] #28475: Allow user to skip test database creation per connection

#28475: Allow user to skip test database creation per connection ---+-- Reporter: Harry Moreno |Owner: nobody Type: Uncategorized | Status: new Component: Uncategorized

Re: [Django] #28474: DurationField does not handle OverflowError if an out of range input is passed

#28474: DurationField does not handle OverflowError if an out of range input is passed + Reporter: v1k45 |Owner: v1k45 Type: Bug | Status: assigned Component: Forms |

Re: [Django] #28475: Allow user to skip test database creation per connection

#28475: Allow user to skip test database creation per connection ---+-- Reporter: Harry Moreno |Owner: nobody Type: New feature| Status: new Component:

Re: [Django] #28475: Allow user to skip test database creation per connection

#28475: Allow user to skip test database creation per connection ---+-- Reporter: Harry Moreno |Owner: nobody Type: Uncategorized | Status: new Component: Uncategorized

Re: [Django] #28475: Allow user to skip test database creation per connection

#28475: Allow user to skip test database creation per connection ---+-- Reporter: Harry Moreno |Owner: nobody Type: New feature| Status: new Component: