Re: [Django] #29270: KeyError if using 'password' as readonly_fields in UserAdmin

#29270: KeyError if using 'password' as readonly_fields in UserAdmin --+--- Reporter: Malte Gerth |Owner: Malte Gerth Type: Bug | Status: assigned Component:

Re: [Django] #27936: Add some clarifications to "Spanning multi-valued relationships"

#27936: Add some clarifications to "Spanning multi-valued relationships" --+ Reporter: Thomas Güttler|Owner: nobody Type: Cleanup/optimization | Status: new

Re: [Django] #29271: Chaining Filters on a Reverse Foreign Key Produces Multiple Joins

#29271: Chaining Filters on a Reverse Foreign Key Produces Multiple Joins -+- Reporter: Michael MacIntosh|Owner: nobody Type: Bug | Status: closed

Re: [Django] #29271: Chaining Filters on a Reverse Foreign Key Produces Multiple Joins

#29271: Chaining Filters on a Reverse Foreign Key Produces Multiple Joins -+- Reporter: Michael MacIntosh|Owner: nobody Type: Bug | Status: new

Re: [Django] #27161: TypedChoiceField fails to validate properly when used with ArrayField

#27161: TypedChoiceField fails to validate properly when used with ArrayField -+- Reporter: Roman Karpovich |Owner: Rômulo | Rosa Furtado Type:

Re: [Django] #29271: Chaining Filters on a Reverse Foreign Key Produces Multiple Joins

#29271: Chaining Filters on a Reverse Foreign Key Produces Multiple Joins -+- Reporter: Michael MacIntosh|Owner: nobody Type: Bug | Status: new

[Django] #29271: Chaining Filters on a Reverse Foreign Key Produces Multiple Joins

#29271: Chaining Filters on a Reverse Foreign Key Produces Multiple Joins -+- Reporter: Michael| Owner: nobody MacIntosh | Type: Bug|

Re: [Django] #27161: TypedChoiceField fails to validate properly when used with ArrayField

#27161: TypedChoiceField fails to validate properly when used with ArrayField -+- Reporter: Roman Karpovich |Owner: Rômulo | Rosa Furtado Type:

Re: [Django] #28919: Add support for Common Table Expression (CTE) queries

#28919: Add support for Common Table Expression (CTE) queries -+- Reporter: Daniel Miller|Owner: nobody Type: New feature | Status: new Component:

Re: [Django] #29266: Cannot perform schema migrations without downtime using MySQL in strict mode

#29266: Cannot perform schema migrations without downtime using MySQL in strict mode -+- Reporter: Paul Tiplady |Owner: nobody Type: New feature | Status:

Re: [Django] #470: Add Field.db_default for defining database defaults

#470: Add Field.db_default for defining database defaults -+- Reporter: jws |Owner: nobody Type: New feature | Status: new Component:

Re: [Django] #29266: Cannot perform schema migrations without downtime using MySQL in strict mode

#29266: Cannot perform schema migrations without downtime using MySQL in strict mode -+- Reporter: Paul Tiplady |Owner: nobody Type: New feature | Status:

Re: [Django] #470: Add Field.db_default for defining database defaults (was: [patch] "default" values should be expressed in SQL schema)

#470: Add Field.db_default for defining database defaults -+- Reporter: jws |Owner: nobody Type: New feature | Status: closed Component:

Re: [Django] #29245: ForeignKeyField Renaming leads Remove and AddField instead of RenameField Migration

#29245: ForeignKeyField Renaming leads Remove and AddField instead of RenameField Migration -+- Reporter: Taqi Abbas |Owner: nobody Type: |

Re: [Django] #29268: Support passing content_type=None to test.Client.post() to get the default value

#29268: Support passing content_type=None to test.Client.post() to get the default value --+ Reporter: Chris Jerdonek|Owner: nobody Type: Cleanup/optimization |

Re: [Django] #29265: Docs about static files should explain benefits of using {% static %} template tag

#29265: Docs about static files should explain benefits of using {% static %} template tag --+ Reporter: Ryan Govostes |Owner: nobody Type: Cleanup/optimization |

Re: [Django] #29265: Docs about static files should explain benefits of using {% static %} template tag

#29265: Docs about static files should explain benefits of using {% static %} template tag --+ Reporter: Ryan Govostes |Owner: nobody Type: Cleanup/optimization |

Re: [Django] #29270: KeyError if using 'password' as readonly_fields in UserAdmin

#29270: KeyError if using 'password' as readonly_fields in UserAdmin --+ Reporter: Malte Gerth |Owner: nobody Type: Bug | Status: new Component: contrib.auth |

Re: [Django] #29265: Docs about static files should explain benefits of using {% static %} template tag

#29265: Docs about static files should explain benefits of using {% static %} template tag --+ Reporter: Ryan Govostes |Owner: nobody Type: Cleanup/optimization |

Re: [Django] #29148: Explain how to use QuerySet.get_or_create() with Q objects

#29148: Explain how to use QuerySet.get_or_create() with Q objects ---+--- Reporter: Mike Lissner |Owner: Dhruv Singh Type: New feature| Status: closed Component:

Re: [Django] #29258: Add an error message when passing an authentication backend class to login()'s backend argument where a string is expected

#29258: Add an error message when passing an authentication backend class to login()'s backend argument where a string is expected -+- Reporter: Ryan Govostes|Owner: Abeer Type:

Re: [Django] #29268: Support passing content_type=None to test.Client.post() to get the default value

#29268: Support passing content_type=None to test.Client.post() to get the default value --+ Reporter: Chris Jerdonek|Owner: nobody Type: Cleanup/optimization |

Re: [Django] #29270: KeyError if using 'password' as readonly_fields in UserAdmin

#29270: KeyError if using 'password' as readonly_fields in UserAdmin --+-- Reporter: Malte Gerth |Owner: nobody Type: Bug | Status: new Component: contrib.auth

[Django] #29270: KeyError if using 'password' as readonly_fields in UserAdmin

#29270: KeyError if using 'password' as readonly_fields in UserAdmin ---+ Reporter: Jan Malte Gerth | Owner: nobody Type: Bug | Status: new Component:

Re: [Django] #29267: Refactor ModelForm to support separate fields

#29267: Refactor ModelForm to support separate fields ---+-- Reporter: Victor Porton |Owner: nobody Type: New feature| Status: closed Component: Forms |

Re: [Django] #29269: django inspectdb with windows

#29269: django inspectdb with windows ---+-- Reporter: Balaraju |Owner: nobody Type: Uncategorized | Status: closed Component: Migrations |

[Django] #29269: django inspectdb with windows

#29269: django inspectdb with windows -+ Reporter: Balaraju | Owner: nobody Type: Uncategorized | Status: new Component: Migrations |Version:

Re: [Django] #25590: Allow fields to set join class

#25590: Allow fields to set join class -+- Reporter: Anssi Kääriäinen |Owner: nobody Type: New feature | Status: closed Component: Database layer

Re: [Django] #26426: Add a way to customize a QuerySet's joins

#26426: Add a way to customize a QuerySet's joins -+- Reporter: Charlie DeTar|Owner: nobody Type: New feature | Status: closed Component: Database

Re: [Django] #29262: Custom Left Outer Join in Queries

#29262: Custom Left Outer Join in Queries -+- Reporter: Sassan Haradji |Owner: nobody Type: New feature | Status: new Component: Database layer

Re: [Django] #29262: Custom Left Outer Join in Queries

#29262: Custom Left Outer Join in Queries -+- Reporter: Sassan Haradji |Owner: nobody Type: New feature | Status: new Component: Database layer