Re: [Django] #29787: ForeignKey to User with BigIntegerField id/pk gets created as 'integer' instead of 'bigint' field in postgres

2018-09-23 Thread Django
#29787: ForeignKey to User with BigIntegerField id/pk gets created as 'integer' instead of 'bigint' field in postgres -+- Reporter: Andrew Badr |Owner: nobody Type: Bug

Re: [Django] #29780: Using default UserModel in django.contrib.auth forms

2018-09-23 Thread Django
#29780: Using default UserModel in django.contrib.auth forms -+- Reporter: Marcelo Canina |Owner: (none) Type: | Status: closed

Re: [Django] #29786: Add option to lock rows with select_for_update() immediately

2018-09-23 Thread Django
#29786: Add option to lock rows with select_for_update() immediately -+- Reporter: ovalseven8 |Owner: nobody Type: New feature | Status: closed

Re: [Django] #29787: ForeignKey to User with BigIntegerField id/pk gets created as 'integer' instead of 'bigint' field in postgres

2018-09-23 Thread Django
#29787: ForeignKey to User with BigIntegerField id/pk gets created as 'integer' instead of 'bigint' field in postgres -+- Reporter: Andrew Badr |Owner: nobody Type: Bug

Re: [Django] #29787: ForeignKey to User with BigIntegerField id/pk gets created as 'integer' instead of 'bigint' field in postgres

2018-09-23 Thread Django
#29787: ForeignKey to User with BigIntegerField id/pk gets created as 'integer' instead of 'bigint' field in postgres -+- Reporter: Andrew Badr |Owner: nobody Type: Bug

Re: [Django] #28305: AlterField migration tries to alter column that still has a foreign key contraint

2018-09-23 Thread Django
#28305: AlterField migration tries to alter column that still has a foreign key contraint -+- Reporter: Andreas Backx|Owner: nobody Type: Bug |

[Django] #29787: ForeignKey to User with BigIntegerField id/pk gets created as 'integer' instead of 'bigint' field in postgres

2018-09-23 Thread Django
#29787: ForeignKey to User with BigIntegerField id/pk gets created as 'integer' instead of 'bigint' field in postgres -+- Reporter: Andrew | Owner: nobody Badr |

Re: [Django] #29786: Add option to lock rows with select_for_update() immediately

2018-09-23 Thread Django
#29786: Add option to lock rows with select_for_update() immediately -+- Reporter: ovalseven8 |Owner: nobody Type: New feature | Status: new

Re: [Django] #29786: Add option to lock rows with select_for_update() immediately

2018-09-23 Thread Django
#29786: Add option to lock rows with select_for_update() immediately -+- Reporter: ovalseven8 |Owner: nobody Type: New feature | Status: new

Re: [Django] #29786: Add option to lock rows with select_for_update() immediately

2018-09-23 Thread Django
#29786: Add option to lock rows with select_for_update() immediately -+- Reporter: ovalseven8 |Owner: nobody Type: New feature | Status: new

[Django] #29786: Add option to lock rows with select_for_update() immediately

2018-09-23 Thread Django
#29786: Add option to lock rows with select_for_update() immediately -+- Reporter: | Owner: nobody ovalseven8 | Type: New|