Re: [Django] #30479: Autoreloader with StatReloader doesn't track changes in manage.py. (was: Auto-reloading with StatReloader may not track changes to the main entrypoint?)

2019-05-16 Thread Django
#30479: Autoreloader with StatReloader doesn't track changes in manage.py. -+ Reporter: Keryn Knight |Owner: nobody Type: Bug | Status: new Component: Ut

Re: [Django] #30220: Use headless browsers for selenium tests

2019-05-16 Thread Django
#30220: Use headless browsers for selenium tests -+- Reporter: Johannes Hoppe |Owner: Johannes Type: | Hoppe Cleanup/optimization |

Re: [Django] #30459: If a StackedInline has fieldsets with the "collapsed" class, the "Show" link doesn't work on inline forms added with the "Add another [inline object]" link

2019-05-16 Thread Django
#30459: If a StackedInline has fieldsets with the "collapsed" class, the "Show" link doesn't work on inline forms added with the "Add another [inline object]" link -+- Reporter: Antonis |O

Re: [Django] #30459: If a StackedInline has fieldsets with the "collapsed" class, the "Show" link doesn't work on inline forms added with the "Add another [inline object]" link

2019-05-16 Thread Django
#30459: If a StackedInline has fieldsets with the "collapsed" class, the "Show" link doesn't work on inline forms added with the "Add another [inline object]" link -+- Reporter: Antonis |O

Re: [Django] #30480: Discrepancy in `DateTime` field value If the django orm union() is used with the empty array in the filter.

2019-05-16 Thread Django
#30480: Discrepancy in `DateTime` field value If the django orm union() is used with the empty array in the filter. -+- Reporter: Shashank Parekh |Owner: nobody Type: Bug

Re: [Django] #30482: prefetch_related_objects evaluates queryset when checking for invalid prefetch ordering.

2019-05-16 Thread Django
#30482: prefetch_related_objects evaluates queryset when checking for invalid prefetch ordering. -+- Reporter: Iain P. Watts|Owner: Iain P. | Watts

Re: [Django] #30486: Custom aggregate function example needs updating for Django 2.2's `allow_distinct`

2019-05-16 Thread Django
#30486: Custom aggregate function example needs updating for Django 2.2's `allow_distinct` -+- Reporter: Carlton Gibson |Owner: | Vyacheslav V.V. Ty

Re: [Django] #30486: Custom aggregate function example needs updating for Django 2.2's `allow_distinct`

2019-05-16 Thread Django
#30486: Custom aggregate function example needs updating for Django 2.2's `allow_distinct` -+- Reporter: Carlton Gibson |Owner: | Vyacheslav V.V. Ty

Re: [Django] #30486: Custom aggregate function example needs updating for Django 2.2's `allow_distinct`

2019-05-16 Thread Django
#30486: Custom aggregate function example needs updating for Django 2.2's `allow_distinct` +--- Reporter: Carlton Gibson |Owner: VVyacheslav Type: Bug | Status: a

Re: [Django] #30475: Use of i18n_patterns and a buggy 404 template trigger internal server error without a backtrace

2019-05-16 Thread Django
#30475: Use of i18n_patterns and a buggy 404 template trigger internal server error without a backtrace -+-- Reporter: Erik Stein |Owner: nobody Type: Bug | Status: cl

Re: [Django] #30481: Document that force_text() allows lone surrogates. (was: force_text() allows lone surrogates)

2019-05-16 Thread Django
#30481: Document that force_text() allows lone surrogates. --+ Reporter: Adam Hooper |Owner: nobody Type: Cleanup/optimization | Status: new Component: Doc

Re: [Django] #30481: force_text() allows lone surrogates

2019-05-16 Thread Django
#30481: force_text() allows lone surrogates --+ Reporter: Adam Hooper |Owner: nobody Type: Cleanup/optimization | Status: new Component: Documentation

Re: [Django] #30486: Custom aggregate function example needs updating for Django 2.2's `allow_distinct`

2019-05-16 Thread Django
#30486: Custom aggregate function example needs updating for Django 2.2's `allow_distinct` + Reporter: Carlton Gibson |Owner: nobody Type: Bug | Status: new C

[Django] #30486: Custom aggregate function example needs updating for Django 2.2's `allow_distinct`

2019-05-16 Thread Django
#30486: Custom aggregate function example needs updating for Django 2.2's `allow_distinct` --+ Reporter: Carlton Gibson | Owner: nobody Type: Bug | Status: new

Re: [Django] #30484: Using RawSQL with CheckConstraint

2019-05-16 Thread Django
#30484: Using RawSQL with CheckConstraint -+- Reporter: David Sanders|Owner: nobody Type: New feature | Status: closed Component: Database layer

Re: [Django] #30483: Switch test requirements from psycopg2-binary package to pscyopg2

2019-05-16 Thread Django
#30483: Switch test requirements from psycopg2-binary package to pscyopg2 --+ Reporter: Jon Dufresne |Owner: nobody Type: Cleanup/optimization | Status: closed

Re: [Django] #30481: force_text() allows lone surrogates

2019-05-16 Thread Django
#30481: force_text() allows lone surrogates +-- Reporter: Adam Hooper |Owner: nobody Type: Uncategorized | Status: new Component: Utilities |

[Django] #30485: Unexpected behavior for django.utils.http.urlencode

2019-05-16 Thread Django
#30485: Unexpected behavior for django.utils.http.urlencode + Reporter: jlubcke | Owner: nobody Type: Bug | Status: new Component: Core (Other) |

Re: [Django] #30484: Using RawSQL with CheckConstraint (was: Feature request: Using RawSQL with CheckConstraint)

2019-05-16 Thread Django
#30484: Using RawSQL with CheckConstraint -+- Reporter: David Sanders|Owner: nobody Type: New feature | Status: new Component: Database layer |