Re: [Django] #21080: collectstatic post-processing fails for references inside comments

2018-05-17 Thread Django
#21080: collectstatic post-processing fails for references inside comments -+ Reporter: shreyas@…|Owner: nobody Type: Bug | Status: new

Re: [Django] #28223: Form not always picklable due to template renderer

2018-05-17 Thread Django
#28223: Form not always picklable due to template renderer --+- Reporter: Claude Paroz |Owner: Gaurav Sehgal Type: Bug | Status: assigned Component: Forms

Re: [Django] #29412: django.utils.text.slugify / SafeString

2018-05-17 Thread Django
#29412: django.utils.text.slugify / SafeString ---+ Reporter: Andreas Pelme |Owner: nobody Type: Uncategorized | Status: new Component: Utilities |

Re: [Django] #29379: Add autocomplete attribute to contrib.auth fields

2018-05-17 Thread Django
#29379: Add autocomplete attribute to contrib.auth fields --+ Reporter: CHI Cheng |Owner: nobody Type: New feature | Status: new Component: contrib.auth |

Re: [Django] #28223: Form not always picklable due to template renderer

2018-05-17 Thread Django
#28223: Form not always picklable due to template renderer --+- Reporter: Claude Paroz |Owner: Gaurav Sehgal Type: Bug | Status: assigned Component: Forms

Re: [Django] #29411: Pickling of a form fails after a form was used in a template

2018-05-17 Thread Django
#29411: Pickling of a form fails after a form was used in a template -+-- Reporter: Torsten Bronger |Owner: nobody Type: Bug | Status: closed Component:

[Django] #29412: django.utils.text.slugify / SafeString

2018-05-17 Thread Django
#29412: django.utils.text.slugify / SafeString -+ Reporter: Andreas Pelme | Owner: nobody Type: Uncategorized | Status: new Component: Utilities |

Re: [Django] #29381: Move some parts of `django.contrib.auth.models` to `django.contrib.auth.base_user` for reusability

2018-05-17 Thread Django
#29381: Move some parts of `django.contrib.auth.models` to `django.contrib.auth.base_user` for reusability ---+ Reporter: Sagar Chalise |Owner: nobody Type: New feature|

Re: [Django] #29381: Move some parts of `django.contrib.auth.models` to `django.contrib.auth.base_user` for reusability

2018-05-17 Thread Django
#29381: Move some parts of `django.contrib.auth.models` to `django.contrib.auth.base_user` for reusability ---+-- Reporter: Sagar Chalise |Owner: nobody Type: Uncategorized |

Re: [Django] #29381: Move some parts of `django.contrib.auth.models` to `django.contrib.auth.base_user` for reusability

2018-05-17 Thread Django
#29381: Move some parts of `django.contrib.auth.models` to `django.contrib.auth.base_user` for reusability ---+-- Reporter: Sagar Chalise |Owner: nobody Type: New feature|

Re: [Django] #29381: Move some parts of `django.contrib.auth.models` to `django.contrib.auth.base_user` for reusability

2018-05-17 Thread Django
#29381: Move some parts of `django.contrib.auth.models` to `django.contrib.auth.base_user` for reusability ---+ Reporter: Sagar Chalise |Owner: nobody Type: New feature|

Re: [Django] #29381: Move some parts of `django.contrib.auth.models` to `django.contrib.auth.base_user` for reusability

2018-05-17 Thread Django
#29381: Move some parts of `django.contrib.auth.models` to `django.contrib.auth.base_user` for reusability ---+-- Reporter: Sagar Chalise |Owner: nobody Type: New feature|

Re: [Django] #29381: Move some parts of `django.contrib.auth.models` to `django.contrib.auth.base_user` for reusability

2018-05-17 Thread Django
#29381: Move some parts of `django.contrib.auth.models` to `django.contrib.auth.base_user` for reusability ---+-- Reporter: Sagar Chalise |Owner: nobody Type: Uncategorized |

Re: [Django] #29128: makemigrations raises AppRegistryNotReady instead of ImproperlyConfigured in Django 2.0

2018-05-17 Thread Django
#29128: makemigrations raises AppRegistryNotReady instead of ImproperlyConfigured in Django 2.0 -+- Reporter: Jaye Doepke |Owner: | ChillarAnand

Re: [Django] #29381: Move some parts of `django.contrib.auth.models` to `django.contrib.auth.base_user` for reusability

2018-05-17 Thread Django
#29381: Move some parts of `django.contrib.auth.models` to `django.contrib.auth.base_user` for reusability ---+-- Reporter: Sagar Chalise |Owner: nobody Type: New feature|

Re: [Django] #29381: Move some parts of `django.contrib.auth.models` to `django.contrib.auth.base_user` for reusability

2018-05-17 Thread Django
#29381: Move some parts of `django.contrib.auth.models` to `django.contrib.auth.base_user` for reusability ---+-- Reporter: Sagar Chalise |Owner: nobody Type: New feature|

Re: [Django] #29381: Move some parts of `django.contrib.auth.models` to `django.contrib.auth.base_user` for reusability

2018-05-17 Thread Django
#29381: Move some parts of `django.contrib.auth.models` to `django.contrib.auth.base_user` for reusability ---+ Reporter: Sagar Chalise |Owner: nobody Type: New feature|

Re: [Django] #28462: ModelAdmin.list_editable unusably slow and memory intensive with large datasets

2018-05-17 Thread Django
#28462: ModelAdmin.list_editable unusably slow and memory intensive with large datasets -+- Reporter: Ben Cole |Owner: nobody Type: Bug |

Re: [Django] #29246: compilemessages management-command fails with UnicodeDecodeError

2018-05-17 Thread Django
#29246: compilemessages management-command fails with UnicodeDecodeError -+- Reporter: Tarun Gaba |Owner: nobody Type: Bug | Status: new

Re: [Django] #29413: `QuerySet._extract_model_params` can/should be enchanced to support lazy defaults

2018-05-17 Thread Django
#29413: `QuerySet._extract_model_params` can/should be enchanced to support lazy defaults -+- Reporter: Viktor Danyliuk |Owner: nobody Type: |

Re: [Django] #29246: compilemessages management-command fails with UnicodeDecodeError

2018-05-17 Thread Django
#29246: compilemessages management-command fails with UnicodeDecodeError -+- Reporter: Tarun Gaba |Owner: nobody Type: Bug | Status: new

Re: [Django] #29381: Move some parts of `django.contrib.auth.models` to `django.contrib.auth.base_user` for reusability

2018-05-17 Thread Django
#29381: Move some parts of `django.contrib.auth.models` to `django.contrib.auth.base_user` for reusability ---+ Reporter: Sagar Chalise |Owner: nobody Type: New feature|

[Django] #29413: `QuerySet._extract_model_params` can/should be enchanced to support lazy defaults

2018-05-17 Thread Django
#29413: `QuerySet._extract_model_params` can/should be enchanced to support lazy defaults -+- Reporter: Viktor | Owner: nobody Danyliuk | Type:

Re: [Django] #29413: `QuerySet._extract_model_params` can/should be enchanced to support lazy defaults

2018-05-17 Thread Django
#29413: `QuerySet._extract_model_params` can/should be enchanced to support lazy defaults -+- Reporter: Viktor Danyliuk |Owner: nobody Type: |

Re: [Django] #29392: Command parsing does not handle options that conflict with `--settings`/`--pythonpath`

2018-05-17 Thread Django
#29392: Command parsing does not handle options that conflict with `--settings`/`--pythonpath` -+- Reporter: Ryan P Kilby |Owner: lefcourn Type: New feature |

Re: [Django] #29000: RenameModel does not rename M2M column when run after AlterField/RenameField

2018-05-17 Thread Django
#29000: RenameModel does not rename M2M column when run after AlterField/RenameField -+ Reporter: David Nelson Adamec |Owner: Jeff Type: Bug | Status:

[Django] #29414: Inlines with no edit permission should still allow users to add new objects

2018-05-17 Thread Django
#29414: Inlines with no edit permission should still allow users to add new objects -+-- Reporter: Paulo | Owner: Paulo Type: Uncategorized | Status: assigned

Re: [Django] #29414: Inlines with no edit permission should still allow users to add new objects

2018-05-17 Thread Django
#29414: Inlines with no edit permission should still allow users to add new objects ---+-- Reporter: Paulo |Owner: Paulo Type: Uncategorized | Status: assigned