Re: [Django] #29987: Deleting non-managed model does not generate a DeleteModel in migrations

#29987: Deleting non-managed model does not generate a DeleteModel in migrations -+- Reporter: Daniel Bowring |Owner: Tim | Fiedler Type: Bug

Re: [Django] #30001: Mark UUIDField.description for translation (was: Add translation for UUID Field Description)

#30001: Mark UUIDField.description for translation -+- Reporter: Prabakaran |Owner: Kumaresshan| Prabakaran Kumaresshan Type: |

Re: [Django] #30000: QuerySet constructed with .union() should raise an exception on unsupported filter() attempt.

#3: QuerySet constructed with .union() should raise an exception on unsupported filter() attempt. -+- Reporter: thoha|Owner: nobody Type: Bug |

Re: [Django] #27936: Add some clarifications to "Spanning multi-valued relationships"

#27936: Add some clarifications to "Spanning multi-valued relationships" --+ Reporter: Thomas Güttler|Owner: nobody Type: Cleanup/optimization | Status: new

Re: [Django] #30001: Mark UUIDField.description for translation

#30001: Mark UUIDField.description for translation -+- Reporter: Prabakaran |Owner: Kumaresshan| Prabakaran Kumaresshan Type: |

Re: [Django] #29995: Make the technical error response more legible when using high contrast mode

#29995: Make the technical error response more legible when using high contrast mode -+- Reporter: Matthew Pava |Owner: Zach Type: | Garwood

Re: [Django] #29995: Make the technical error response more legible when using high contrast mode

#29995: Make the technical error response more legible when using high contrast mode -+- Reporter: Matthew Pava |Owner: Zach Type: | Garwood

Re: [Django] #29995: Make the technical error response more legible when using high contrast mode

#29995: Make the technical error response more legible when using high contrast mode -+- Reporter: Matthew Pava |Owner: Zach Type: | Garwood

Re: [Django] #30001: Add translation for UUID Field Description

#30001: Add translation for UUID Field Description -+- Reporter: Prabakaran |Owner: Kumaresshan| Prabakaran Kumaresshan Type: |

Re: [Django] #30002: Dynamic model

#30002: Dynamic model -+- Reporter: temi4|Owner: temi4 Type: Uncategorized| Status: assigned Component: Database layer |

[Django] #30002: Dynamic model

#30002: Dynamic model -+- Reporter: temi4 | Owner: nobody Type: | Status: new Uncategorized | Component: Database |

Re: [Django] #29995: Make the technical error response more legible when using high contrast mode

#29995: Make the technical error response more legible when using high contrast mode -+- Reporter: Matthew Pava |Owner: Zach Type: | Garwood

Re: [Django] #29995: Make the technical error response more legible when using high contrast mode

#29995: Make the technical error response more legible when using high contrast mode -+- Reporter: Matthew Pava |Owner: Zach Type: | Garwood

Re: [Django] #30002: Dynamic model

#30002: Dynamic model -+- Reporter: temi4|Owner: (none) Type: Uncategorized| Status: closed Component: Database layer |

Re: [Django] #29205: MultiValueField ignores a required value of a sub field

#29205: MultiValueField ignores a required value of a sub field + Reporter: Takayuki Hirai |Owner: nobody Type: Bug | Status: new Component: Forms

Re: [Django] #27936: Add some clarifications to "Spanning multi-valued relationships"

#27936: Add some clarifications to "Spanning multi-valued relationships" --+ Reporter: Thomas Güttler|Owner: nobody Type: Cleanup/optimization | Status: new

Re: [Django] #28643: Complete the ORM Function Library

#28643: Complete the ORM Function Library -+- Reporter: Matthew Pava |Owner: JunyiJ Type: New feature | Status: assigned Component: Database layer

[Django] #29999: Include overriding admin site to tutorial

#2: Include overriding admin site to tutorial + Reporter: stinovlas | Owner: nobody Type: Cleanup/optimization | Status: new Component:

Re: [Django] #30000: Passing QuerySet constructed with .union() causes ModelMultipleChoiceField to return wrong values

#3: Passing QuerySet constructed with .union() causes ModelMultipleChoiceField to return wrong values -+- Reporter: thoha|Owner: nobody Type: Uncategorized|

[Django] #30000: Passing QuerySet constructed with .union() causes ModelMultipleChoiceField to return wrong values

#3: Passing QuerySet constructed with .union() causes ModelMultipleChoiceField to return wrong values -+ Reporter: thoha | Owner: nobody Type: Uncategorized |

Re: [Django] #30000: Passing QuerySet constructed with .union() causes ModelMultipleChoiceField to return wrong values

#3: Passing QuerySet constructed with .union() causes ModelMultipleChoiceField to return wrong values ---+-- Reporter: thoha |Owner: nobody Type: Uncategorized |

Re: [Django] #29998: pk setup for MTI to parent get confused by multiple OneToOne references.

#29998: pk setup for MTI to parent get confused by multiple OneToOne references. -+- Reporter: Mārtiņš Šulcs|Owner: nobody Type: Bug | Status:

Re: [Django] #29997: Allow combining SearchQuerys with different configs

#29997: Allow combining SearchQuerys with different configs -+- Reporter: Jaap Roes|Owner: Jaap Roes Type: Bug | Status: assigned

Re: [Django] #27936: Add some clarifications to "Spanning multi-valued relationships"

#27936: Add some clarifications to "Spanning multi-valued relationships" --+ Reporter: Thomas Güttler|Owner: nobody Type: Cleanup/optimization | Status: new

Re: [Django] #30000: Passing QuerySet constructed with .union() causes ModelMultipleChoiceField to return wrong values

#3: Passing QuerySet constructed with .union() causes ModelMultipleChoiceField to return wrong values -+- Reporter: thoha|Owner: nobody Type: Uncategorized|

Re: [Django] #30000: Passing QuerySet constructed with .union() causes ModelMultipleChoiceField to return wrong values

#3: Passing QuerySet constructed with .union() causes ModelMultipleChoiceField to return wrong values -+- Reporter: thoha|Owner: nobody Type: Bug |

Re: [Django] #29999: Include overriding admin site to tutorial

#2: Include overriding admin site to tutorial -+- Reporter: Jan Musílek |Owner: nobody Type: | Status: new Cleanup/optimization

Re: [Django] #27936: Add some clarifications to "Spanning multi-valued relationships"

#27936: Add some clarifications to "Spanning multi-valued relationships" --+ Reporter: Thomas Güttler|Owner: nobody Type: Cleanup/optimization | Status: new

Re: [Django] #30000: QuerySet constructed with .union() should raise an exception on unsupported filter() attempt. (was: Passing QuerySet constructed with .union() causes ModelMultipleChoiceField to r

#3: QuerySet constructed with .union() should raise an exception on unsupported filter() attempt. -+- Reporter: thoha|Owner: nobody Type: Bug |

Re: [Django] #29205: MultiValueField ignores a required value of a sub field

#29205: MultiValueField ignores a required value of a sub field + Reporter: Takayuki Hirai |Owner: nobody Type: Bug | Status: new Component: Forms

Re: [Django] #30002: Dynamic model

#30002: Dynamic model -+- Reporter: temi4|Owner: (none) Type: Uncategorized| Status: new Component: Database layer |

Re: [Django] #29205: MultiValueField ignores a required value of a sub field

#29205: MultiValueField ignores a required value of a sub field + Reporter: Takayuki Hirai |Owner: nobody Type: Bug | Status: new Component: Forms

Re: [Django] #29997: Allow combining SearchQuerys with different configs

#29997: Allow combining SearchQuerys with different configs -+- Reporter: Jaap Roes|Owner: Jaap Roes Type: Bug | Status: closed

[Django] #30001: Add translation for UUID Field Description

#30001: Add translation for UUID Field Description --+ Reporter: Prabakaran Kumaresshan | Owner: nobody Type: Cleanup/optimization| Status: new

Re: [Django] #30001: Add translation for UUID Field Description

#30001: Add translation for UUID Field Description -+- Reporter: Prabakaran |Owner: Kumaresshan| Prabakaran Kumaresshan Type: |

Re: [Django] #30001: Add translation for UUID Field Description

#30001: Add translation for UUID Field Description -+- Reporter: Prabakaran |Owner: Kumaresshan| Prabakaran Kumaresshan Type: |