ter(num_messages__gt
= 1)
But results vary with the query in my first statement. Or, maybe i'm
not doing it right.
On 19 янв, 14:58, "[CPR]-AL.exe" <cpr.al@gmail.com> wrote:
> Oh, no, that wouldn't work with CharField. Or, maybe I'm doing
> something wrong.
>
> About a
Oh, no, that wouldn't work with CharField. Or, maybe I'm doing
something wrong.
About a queryset - I mistaken aggregate() for annotate().
On 19 янв, 14:52, "[CPR]-AL.exe" <cpr.al@gmail.com> wrote:
> Wait, wat... o.O I'l try that now, thx.
>
>
>
>
>
>
Wait, wat... o.O I'l try that now, thx.
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 2:50 PM, Tom Evans <tevans...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 11:26 AM, [CPR]-AL.exe <cpr.al@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Hmm, yeah, but that still iterates over the objects and filte
hen whilst iterating over
> that, if you need to grab the ORM'd row, just do "row_orm =
> model.get(id=iterated_id_here)"
>
> This is what I tend to do for raw sql queries.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 11:26 AM, [CPR]-AL.exe <cpr.al
ill
> purposely bypass the ORM at bottlenecks and directly query SQL for
> optimization.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 11:07 AM, [CPR]-AL.exe <cpr.al@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Umm... Don't know, actually. That seems, that it would be okay, too.
T id from table GROUP BY tablefield HAVING (COUNT(tablefield) > 1)
>
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 11:02 AM, [CPR]-AL.exe <cpr.al@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Hi there.
>>
>> I'm trying to do something like this:
>>
>> SELECT *
>> FROM table
>> WHERE t
To make it more clear: I have something like a forum and want to find
duplicate messages (meaing the message field should be identical) to
create a report for the moderator.
On 19 янв, 14:02, "[CPR]-AL.exe" <cpr.al@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi there.
>
> I'm tr
Hi there.
I'm trying to do something like this:
SELECT *
FROM table
WHERE tablefield IN (
SELECT tablefield
FROM table
GROUP BY tablefield
HAVING (COUNT(tablefield ) > 1)
)
Tried it in many ways, but didn't suceed. Is there a way to do it with
Django ORM without having to iterate over
Hello.
Is there any way to render a template, omitting the "extends" tag?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com
To
Hello.
I have a simple form with only ImageField declared in it and I've got
the following problem: when I am trying to upload something that is
not am image, i get no errors at all.
Form.is_valid() returns True.
What should I do to validate the imagedata?
I understood that, i just thought there is some nicer way to do it :)
Thx.
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 11:52 PM, Sam Chuparkoff <s...@sadach.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2009-05-20 at 07:09 -0700, [CPR]-AL.exe wrote:
> > So, what is the best way to throw a ValidationError only if
So, what is the best way to throw a ValidationError only if None of
values a entered in subclassed field?
On 19 май, 23:10, Sam Chuparkoff <s...@sadach.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-05-18 at 10:13 -0700, [CPR]-AL.exe wrote:
> > I've created a field+widget set that i use to
It is required
On 19 май, 08:05, Thierry <lamthie...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Isn't required the default behaviour of Field:
>
> http://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/ref/forms/fields/
>
> From the above code, TextInput is required:
>
> forms.TextInput(),
>
> On May 18
above code, TextInput is required:
>
> forms.TextInput(),
>
>
> On May 18, 1:15 pm, "[CPR]-AL.exe" <cpr.al@gmail.com> wrote:
> > class CheckboxSelectWithTextInputWidget(forms.MultiWidget):
> >
> > def __init__(self,choices, attrs=None):
&g
class CheckboxSelectWithTextInputWidget(forms.MultiWidget):
def __init__(self,choices, attrs=None):
widgets = (
forms.CheckboxSelectMultiple(choices = choices),
forms.TextInput(),
)
super(CheckboxSelectWithTextInputWidget,self).__init__
Hello there.
I've created a field+widget set that i use to render a number of
checkboxes and a TextInput with comma-separated values.
The problem is, when i set required = True, I get a ValidationError if
only checkboxes are selected (but i don't get it if TextInput is
filled)
Here are the
Oh, nevermind, i figured out how to make nested joins only with q
objects!
On 9 мар, 17:26, "[CPR]-AL.exe" <cpr.al@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks, but i thought that there's some django-way to do such a
> thing... is there a way i can add raw SQL query to Q object? That wil
> <http://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/topics/db/sql/
>
> > if needed.
>
> On Mar 5, 4:25 am, "[CPR]-AL.exe" <cpr.al@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > So, it seems, that there is no way to do what i want?
>
>
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You r
So, it seems, that there is no way to do what i want?
On 3 мар, 19:17, Alex Gaynor <alex.gay...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 11:13 AM, [CPR]-AL.exe <cpr.al@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > for example, i have this models:
> > (like here:http://www.djangopr
Thanks, but i've already read that and there's no answer for my
question. In SQL this would be some query with nested joins.. but i
don't know how to make this query in django..
On 3 мар, 19:17, Alex Gaynor <alex.gay...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 11:13 AM, [CPR]-AL.ex
Ooops, mean "How", not "Who" ... srry...
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send
Mean, "two reporters", of course
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
for example, i have this models:
(like here: http://www.djangoproject.com/documentation/models/many_to_one/)
from django.db import models
class Reporter(models.Model):
first_name =
23 matches
Mail list logo
