On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 10:53 AM, rpt...@reportlab.com
wrote:
> Does anyone know of any financial firms which use a Django framework?
Yep. I build advanced payment services for a prominent, offshore
payment service provider, using django, python and nginx/uwsgi at the
core.
~JB
--
You received
sounds like magic, though django usually handles magic well :)
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 7:18 PM, John M wrote:
> I was hoping to avoid that type of code, but instead have put a field
> in the linked parent to indicate what type the child is and then have
> a method in the parent as a property whic
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 2:42 AM, Russell Keith-Magee
wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 12:03 PM, Jason Beaudoin
> wrote:
>> Silence usually implies some key piece of documentation was missed, or
>> was this just lost amongst more interesting posts? :)
>
> You've miss
Silence usually implies some key piece of documentation was missed, or
was this just lost amongst more interesting posts? :)
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 9:54 PM, Jason Beaudoin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've a situation where the following functionality is desirable..
>
> - one centr
Hi,
I've a situation where the following functionality is desirable..
- one central model is used and interacted with by users
- forms (multiple on multiple sites, pick a number for each.. 5 or
50, doesn't matter) are submitted by anonymous users and associated
with this central model.. so thes
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 12:00 PM, Igor wrote:
> Thanks a lot - I didn't know about generic relations, and will
> definitely look at them - right now :).
I start thinking about extending models (and other DRY mode/db
methods) when I see myself repetitively typing out too many fields.
~J
--
You r
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 9:02 AM, Bobby Roberts wrote:
> Looking at this code:
>
> newsqlcmd="select title,author from booklist"
> cursor=connection.cursor()
> cursor.execute (newsqlcmd)
> tms=cursor.fetchall() #this is the actual recordset being pushed
> back to the template
>
>
>
Thanks for the thoughts Preston!
> I think a base class with subclasses is the best approach.
>
> Define as much common behavior as possible, set up defaults for those
> fields needed by your outbound API
Indeed, thanks for the confirmation. I think it's time for experimentation!
> How are yo
Anyone else have thoughts on this, with respect to design
considerations, implementing in python versus using some of django's
tools.. ?
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 8:22 AM, Jason Beaudoin wrote:
> 2009/10/23 kmike :
>>
>> Maybe you don't have enough information to
2009/10/23 kmike :
>
> Maybe you don't have enough information to make an abstraction right
> now. If so I suggest to actually implement several API's in a dumb
> way. After that it'll be clear what are the differences and what are
> the common parts so making a good abstraction will be easier.
I
Why hello there,
I have been thinking over this system design for quite a while now,
and I'm still a bit unsure of the sensible way to properly (and
sufficiently) abstract the system - the django-way, so to speak. I am
very interested in what other folks have to say - maybe I have been
thinking a
>
>
> @Jason - I think that's the number one reason I'm going to PostgreSQL. I
> don't use everything all the time but I really like to have the widest array
> of query syntax options. MySQL is just too limiting, especially when
> PostgreSQL is available.
>
>
The other issue I have with MySQL is t
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 4:29 PM, Joshua Russo wrote:
> I personally don't have any experience with PostgreSQL and I'm generally
> working in a mixed MS and Linux environment. I'm interested to hear peoples
> views on the pluses and minuses of the two different systems. I'm a bit of a
> query geek
On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 10:09 AM, Thomas Guettler wrote:
>
> I can speak only for postgres.
>
> We create the database with a special admin-account and
> the owner if the db is the admin-account. Then we grant
> insert, update, delete permissions to the django-db-user.
>
> We have a modified manag
Miriam,
If you do take this to django-developers, please post a link here, at
least.. this would be greatly appreciated. Thanks :)
~Jason
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 7:39 PM, Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 11:21 PM, Miriam wrote:
> >
> > Hi Russ --
> >
> > Thanks for your r
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 5:43 PM, Frank Peterson
wrote:
>
> I'm on Django 0.91 (unfortunately we are stuck with that and cannot
> upgrade).
>
I have a really hard time believe you truly are stuck.
Migration may not be the simplest in the short-run, but certainly sensible
in the long-term. Who want
16 matches
Mail list logo
