Re: ANN: DSE v2.0.0-Beta - DSE uses 1.8% of the time compared to the Django ORM updating 100.000 records.

I will definitely be using this next time. Nice post. Brian On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 5:50 PM, Thomas Weholt wrote: > Hi, > > Just posted a new blog about more realistic performance of DSE against > a real database. Head over to http://weholt.blogspot.com/ to read it. > >

Re: ANN: DSE v2.0.0-Beta - DSE uses 1.8% of the time compared to the Django ORM updating 100.000 records.

Hi, Just posted a new blog about more realistic performance of DSE against a real database. Head over to http://weholt.blogspot.com/ to read it. Thanks for your feedback! Regards, Thomas On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 1:55 PM, Brian Bouterse wrote: > This would have been so useful

Re: ANN: DSE v2.0.0-Beta - DSE uses 1.8% of the time compared to the Django ORM updating 100.000 records.

Thanks for DSE! I tried it earlier (version 0.6 I think). While I really liked the speed improvement, there were 2 areas that did not suit me too well: - error detection - I needed reliability more than speed and I was not comfortable with situations like "the IntegrityErrror is somewhere in

Fwd: ANN: DSE v2.0.0-Beta - DSE uses 1.8% of the time compared to the Django ORM updating 100.000 records.

Amazingly, I'm actually due to run a clean up script on a database with 32 million rows in the next couple of days... Could you possibly answer: - How mature is the code? - Have you encountered any strange problems whilst using it? - How many other people have used this in production

Re: ANN: DSE v2.0.0-Beta - DSE uses 1.8% of the time compared to the Django ORM updating 100.000 records.

Hehe ... yes, that's exactly the kind of things DSE is good at. 1.8% of two days ... that's half an hour?? Mind you, I've so far not inserted that many records, so if you ever get the chance to try that out please let me know how it goes. Thomas On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 1:55 PM, Brian Bouterse

Re: ANN: DSE v2.0.0-Beta - DSE uses 1.8% of the time compared to the Django ORM updating 100.000 records.

This would have been so useful on my last project. 14.4 Million records took a couple of days with a single thread using the ORM. This would have really sped things up. Brian On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 7:50 AM, Thomas Weholt wrote: > Inserting, updating or deleting lots

ANN: DSE v2.0.0-Beta - DSE uses 1.8% of the time compared to the Django ORM updating 100.000 records.

Inserting, updating or deleting lots of records using the Django ORM? Want better performance? Check out DSE! It's free, released under the GPL licence. More information about the possible performance gain can be seen here: