> > This week I decided to give a try to a new configuration. I'm now
> > running django on lighttpd / fcgi and I have no swap at all.
> > So I'm aware the mod_python is the prefered way to use django ... buy
> > I'm quite happy with that new server configuration :)
>
> Can you give some more
On 3/30/07, xgdlm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> This week I decided to give a try to a new configuration. I'm now
> running django on lighttpd / fcgi and I have no swap at all.
> So I'm aware the mod_python is the prefered way to use django ... buy
> I'm quite happy with that new server
Hello,
I've notice the same memory consuption on my servers.
I'm running django appz on 3 LVS loadbalanced mod_python apache http
servers.
If, for instance, I do a maintnance on one of the server Swap is
increasing a lot on the two remaining servers, even if those two
servers should handle the
Graham Dumpleton wrote on 03/30/07 12:27:
> On Mar 30, 6:31 pm, Steven Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> My understanding is that every apache child pulls in all modules
>> (mod_python, mod_perl, mod_php, mod_your_favorite_mod_here) which all
>> consume memory. So you end up with loads of
On Mar 30, 6:31 pm, Steven Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My understanding is that every apache child pulls in all modules
> (mod_python, mod_perl, mod_php, mod_your_favorite_mod_here) which all
> consume memory. So you end up with loads of processes using ??MB of RAM
> to serve up e.g. a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 03/29/07 20:15:
> I'm running a production Django application on two loadbalanced
> webservers and a single, dedicated Postgres server handling around
> 500k requests/day. I'm using memcached, and my database server
> performance has been fantastic.
>
> Lately, I've
Warning: almost no actual Django-related content below...
On Thu, 2007-03-29 at 18:15 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm running a production Django application on two loadbalanced
> webservers and a single, dedicated Postgres server handling around
> 500k requests/day. I'm using memcached,
> ... Failing all else start
> profiling. Coordinate those memory usage stats you have with what is
> going on in the server to help narrow down where in your code to
> look. Hope that helps and good luck.
Is there a way of profiling mod_python with hotshot (or another tool)
that will give me
On 3/29/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My most popular view looks for a memcached RSS feed, and if it doesn't
> exist, uses URLLIB2 to go out and get it (then cache it). I've read
> about possible problems with URLLIB2.openurl() that it might not free
> the socket after use.
You stated that things were working fine and lately they have gone
South. Usually in this case it isn't about something breaking all of
a sudden. Something has probably changed. Start with what you have
changed. Added any new features or code lately? Moving out further
have there been any
I'm running a production Django application on two loadbalanced
webservers and a single, dedicated Postgres server handling around
500k requests/day. I'm using memcached, and my database server
performance has been fantastic.
Lately, I've been hitting very high percentages of free memory used,
11 matches
Mail list logo
