On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 8:38 PM, Joshua Partogi wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> Not trying to flame here, but I've just read Jacob's post here:
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.dojo.user/3603
>
> What made django developers changed their mind not to bundle dojo in 1.0 ?
> Is there any history to th
Dear all,
Not trying to flame here, but I've just read Jacob's post here:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.dojo.user/3603
What made django developers changed their mind not to bundle dojo in 1.0 ?
Is there any history to that?
Kind regards,
--
Join Scrum8.com.
http://blog.scrum8.com
ht
On 12/18/06, Jacob Kaplan-Moss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At one point, I thought about using Dojo for some improvements in Django's
> admin interface; this would have meant such an inclusion. To make a long
> story short... it didn't really work :)
Yeah, and my short-lived attempt to port our
On 12/18/06 6:18 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I would say it does make a difference. If a lead developer wanted to do
> it and found it didn't work, I would rather not to spend the effort as
> I would assume there must be some technical difficulties.
>
> It won't change anything about whether I
I would say it does make a difference. If a lead developer wanted to do
it and found it didn't work, I would rather not to spend the effort as
I would assume there must be some technical difficulties.
It won't change anything about whether I would use django(that depends
on the kind of project, r
On 12/18/06 3:11 AM, Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
> On 12/18/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I googled and found some messages/blogs that dojo is supposed to be
>> included in django 0.92 yet I failed to find it in the 0.95 release.
>
> I don't know where you read that, but Dojo
thanks,
this is what I googled which made me confused.
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.dojo.user/3603
Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
> On 12/18/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I googled and found some messages/blogs that dojo is supposed to be
> > included in djang
On 12/18/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I googled and found some messages/blogs that dojo is supposed to be
> included in django 0.92 yet I failed to find it in the 0.95 release.
>
> Does anyone know the status of it ?
>
> regards
>
>
You would find few about ajax bind with d
On 12/18/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I googled and found some messages/blogs that dojo is supposed to be
> included in django 0.92 yet I failed to find it in the 0.95 release.
I don't know where you read that, but Dojo is _not_ going to be
included in Django.
Django is,
I googled and found some messages/blogs that dojo is supposed to be
included in django 0.92 yet I failed to find it in the 0.95 release.
Does anyone know the status of it ?
regards
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to t
10 matches
Mail list logo
