On Mar 23, 8:15 pm, Malcolm Tredinnick
wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 15:08 -0700, Graham Dumpleton wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > More of a concern is that mod_python is still regarded as the most
> > robust production setup. I can't see that mod_wsgi is even mentioned
> >
On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 15:08 -0700, Graham Dumpleton wrote:
[...]
> More of a concern is that mod_python is still regarded as the most
> robust production setup. I can't see that mod_wsgi is even mentioned
> at all.
Here's a wild thought from out of left field: have you thought of
contacting the
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 6:08 PM, Graham Dumpleton <
graham.dumple...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mar 18, 6:20 pm, Gour wrote:
> > > "Alex" == Alex Gaynor writes:
> >
> > Alex> Adrian just put the last batch of chapters online, so I believe
> >
On Mar 18, 6:20 pm, Gour wrote:
> > "Alex" == Alex Gaynor writes:
>
> Alex> Adrian just put the last batch of chapters online, so I believe
> Alex> all the content is now up. Having skimmed most of it I can say it
> Alex> looks really good and
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 5:31 PM, Scot Hacker wrote:
>
>
> On Mar 17, 2009, at 10:51 AM, Alex Gaynor wrote:
>
> > Adrian just put the last batch of chapters online, so I believe all
> > the content is now up. Having skimmed most of it I can say it looks
> > really good and
On Mar 17, 2009, at 10:51 AM, Alex Gaynor wrote:
> Adrian just put the last batch of chapters online, so I believe all
> the content is now up. Having skimmed most of it I can say it looks
> really good and I'm sure it basically all works, that said it isn't
> a final addition so there
> "Alex" == Alex Gaynor writes:
Alex> Adrian just put the last batch of chapters online, so I believe
Alex> all the content is now up. Having skimmed most of it I can say it
Alex> looks really good and I'm sure it basically all works, that said
Alex> it isn't a final
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 1:47 PM, waltbrad wrote:
>
> I happened to visit the Django Book site 2.0 It still says that it's
> not complete, but it seems to cover everything the 1.0 did except for
> deployment and the Appendices. Could a person get a pretty good
> grounding
I happened to visit the Django Book site 2.0 It still says that it's
not complete, but it seems to cover everything the 1.0 did except for
deployment and the Appendices. Could a person get a pretty good
grounding in django now by reading 2.0? I guess what I mean is that
for the past few
9 matches
Mail list logo