vor Django, I think I am still new enough to the
> community that my opinions shouldn't be too biased. Hopefully this
> post helps other make the right decision for their team/project.
>
> Here's the link: http://beta.feedmagnet.com/blog/django-vs-rails/
>
> >
>
--
P
tely favor Django, I think I am still new enough to the
community that my opinions shouldn't be too biased. Hopefully this
post helps other make the right decision for their team/project.
Here's the link: http://beta.feedmagnet.com/blog/django-vs-rails/
--~--~-~--~~
django vs pylons - their servers showing a page which uses a template
with 5 variables (values returned by the view/controller)
no mod_python, apache or any other.
I'll test X + lighttp/apache soon (I need to read the docs ;) )
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received
is this a test of django vs pylons or a test of mod_python vs wsgi ?
a pre-test showing a serving a simple static page through both of
them (also 15k) would highlight
if django's templating engine is indeed faster than pylons.
(and it might convince the pylons team to use mod-python instead of
a nice overview of the test (django and pylons) can be found here:
http://www.cms.rk.edu.pl/benchmark.html
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to d
The test django page used no DB and the test itself didn't do much I/O
operations and the system didn't go into swap. As for errors I get this
from the running server (in console):
###
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
"/home/piotr/nowe/pytho
On Jul 16, 2006, at 8:45 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I've done some httperf testing og the django server. I've used Arch
> Linux (i686) on a Acer Aspire 5002 WLMi Laptop (AMD Turion 1,6GHz,
> 512MB DDR RAM) from text mode (no X running)
Interesting stuff -- thanks for the benchmarks.
I'd note
I've done some httperf testing og the django server. I've used Arch
Linux (i686) on a Acer Aspire 5002 WLMi Laptop (AMD Turion 1,6GHz,
512MB DDR RAM) from text mode (no X running) I've tested a working
django server with:
httperf --server=localhost --port=8080 --uri=/test/ --num-conns=7000
--num-
nice, very nice :) pylons and Turbogears benchmark would add a bit of
flamish excitement to it... (and it would be quite interesting)
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users" group.
To post to
Andy Dustman wrote:
> On 7/14/06, Jacob Kaplan-Moss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>On Jul 14, 2006, at 1:18 PM, Adrian Holovaty wrote:
>>
>>>Some folks benchmarked Symfony, Ruby on Rails and Django. Django was
>>>the fastest.
>>
>>By over 30% -- hell yeah!
>>
>>Now, I've always known in my gut
On 7/14/06, Andy Dustman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
And with MySQL, to boot.
Nothing is perfect..xD
-- SDM UnderlinuxGarimpar.com--PEP-8"Mais vale um ponteiro na mao do que duas classes voando"
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscri
On 7/14/06, Jacob Kaplan-Moss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jul 14, 2006, at 1:18 PM, Adrian Holovaty wrote:
> > Some folks benchmarked Symfony, Ruby on Rails and Django. Django was
> > the fastest.
>
> By over 30% -- hell yeah!
>
> Now, I've always known in my gut that Django's pretty damn fa
On 7/14/06, Jacob Kaplan-Moss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jul 14, 2006, at 1:18 PM, Adrian Holovaty wrote:
> > Some folks benchmarked Symfony, Ruby on Rails and Django. Django was
> > the fastest.
>
> By over 30% -- hell yeah!
>
That's awesome... congrats Django developers!
-ian
--~--~---
On Jul 14, 2006, at 1:18 PM, Adrian Holovaty wrote:
> Some folks benchmarked Symfony, Ruby on Rails and Django. Django was
> the fastest.
By over 30% -- hell yeah!
Now, I've always known in my gut that Django's pretty damn fast, but
seeing it verified by the RoR website...
Priceless :)
Jacob
Some folks benchmarked Symfony, Ruby on Rails and Django. Django was
the fastest.
Check it out here:
http://wiki.rubyonrails.com/rails/pages/Framework+Performance
And don't forget to Digg and del.icio.us!
http://digg.com/programming/Django_vs._Rails_vs._Symfony_Django_is_fastest
http://del.ici
On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 07:17:16PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> There is only one Rails book that is in print at the moment(non pdf).
> There are several others that are going to be released very soon
> though.
http://www.robsanheim.com/2006/03/23/ruby-and-ruby-on-rails-book-roundup/
is a
On 4/13/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You have good friends, they are giving you great advice. Rails is in
> it's second production release, has a huge following, and a number of
> books to help document it. Django is still in a major development
> phase and is geared toward
Glenn Tenney wrote:
> Several friends have been pushing me to look at Rails, so I've been reading
> through "Agile Web Development with Rails".
You have good friends, they are giving you great advice. Rails is in
it's second production release, has a huge following, and a number of
books to help
tonemcd wrote:
> That's a really good screencast - the Java-based frameworks come out
> particularly badly (but the author is looking more at the rapid
> applications development model, where multiple XML configs and
> compiling certainly doesn't help matters)
>
> I was surprised at how well Zope
tonemcd wrote:
> I was surprised at how well Zope (Plone actually) comes out of it. I
> guess he was using Archetypes to do the heavy lifting - I've found
> plone to have a *very* steep learning curve.
I think he used ArchGenXML. Archetypes are cool (they're a slightly
higher abstraction/dsl th
Glenn Tenney think.org> writes:
>
> 2. In Rails you need to declare your SQL code *and* tell Rails about
> your schema, but in Django it's all very nicely put into an object
> oriented description in your model. A big win, to me, for Django.
Rails has something called migrations (see
http://
That's a really good screencast - the Java-based frameworks come out
particularly badly (but the author is looking more at the rapid
applications development model, where multiple XML configs and
compiling certainly doesn't help matters)
I was surprised at how well Zope (Plone actually) comes out
On 4/12/06, Jeremy Dunck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 4/12/06, Glenn Tenney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 3. Rails supports and integrates well with Ajax. I know that this is
> > "coming" for Django... sometime "real soon now"... how's it going?
> > When might it be out?
>
> AFAIK, Rails trie
On 4/12/06, Glenn Tenney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 3. Rails supports and integrates well with Ajax. I know that this is
> "coming" for Django... sometime "real soon now"... how's it going?
> When might it be out?
AFAIK, Rails tries to abstract away the generated JS, and in doing so
makes code
It's a personal choice. Why not take a day and evaluate the contenders
by writing a simple little app (voting/wiki/blog etc.) Find which one
fits with you. Also think about how and where it will be
deployed/hosted and how easy/possible that is with the system you
choose. Personally: having written
On 4/12/06, Glenn Tenney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 3. Rails supports and integrates well with Ajax. I know that this is
> "coming" for Django... sometime "real soon now"... how's it going?
> When might it be out?
I put in the patch for the initial Django/Dojo mashup (Dojo is the
JavaScript to
On 4/12/06, Glenn Tenney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 5. Rails has a book or two already out there -- and already out of
> sync with the version of Rails recently released. Django's book is
> "in the pipeline" but I doubt it'll be out until 0.92 gets released.
Django 0.92 will *definitely* be ou
Several friends have been pushing me to look at Rails, so I've been reading
through "Agile Web Development with Rails".
Some quick thoughts... with a couple of questions thrown in...
1. Ok, there IS the Ruby vs Python thing... I'll leave that to some
*other* place for THAT flame fest as I do N
28 matches
Mail list logo
