-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
We have discussed together a bit and sorted some things out.
Here's a little update:
To stop spamming the mailing list, we created a new one:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe visit this page:
http://golfos.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/djangoforge
Howdy folks,
This issue came up yet again on the IRC channel today, and myself,
jesusphreak and a couple of others did yet more brainstorming, partly
recycling earlier topics and partly moving things forward even more.
It started about here:
On 02-Oct-06, at 7:12 AM, Sean Schertell wrote:
> I posted publicly about giving up on django because I thought it
> might help air out some niggling issues in django
you have not answered the question. When you left PHP, did you post
publicly to help air out some niggling issues in PHP,
On 02/10/2006, at 11:42 AM, Sean Schertell wrote:
>
>>> I'm the guy that started this thread and had pledged to take the
>>> lead
>>> on this. Ironically, I'm also the guy who started the recent thread
>>> "Why I'm giving up on Django". So for now, it looks like I'll be
>>> taking an
>> I'm the guy that started this thread and had pledged to take the lead
>> on this. Ironically, I'm also the guy who started the recent thread
>> "Why I'm giving up on Django". So for now, it looks like I'll be
>> taking an indefinite hiatus from Django dev.
>
> just curious - did you indulge in
On 01-Oct-06, at 9:08 AM, Sean Schertell wrote:
> I'm the guy that started this thread and had pledged to take the lead
> on this. Ironically, I'm also the guy who started the recent thread
> "Why I'm giving up on Django". So for now, it looks like I'll be
> taking an indefinite hiatus from
Hi,
I'm the guy that started this thread and had pledged to take the lead
on this. Ironically, I'm also the guy who started the recent thread
"Why I'm giving up on Django". So for now, it looks like I'll be
taking an indefinite hiatus from Django dev.
If someone wants to take this idea
Uhm..
I was waitting for Ian Holsman who said had something on pending of
some 'styling', if no body is on it I can take over it ;)
Cheers,
Marc.
On 9/30/06, Steven Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 09/30/06 17:35, Lucas Vogelsang wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Is this project/thread dead or is
On 09/30/06 17:35, Lucas Vogelsang wrote:
> Hi,
> Is this project/thread dead or is someone working on it?
>
> I'd like to use this repository, however I am fully tied up with my
> other projects and can't help pushing it forward.
>
> regards,
> lucas
>
looks like all the others have the
Hi,
Is this project/thread dead or is someone working on it?
I'd like to use this repository, however I am fully tied up with my
other projects and can't help pushing it forward.
regards,
lucas
>
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you
Marc Fargas wrote:
> I agree on those, maybe the greatest thing to get on would be to
> provide that svn+trac that some people was interested in, and to put
> the snippets inside. And setup something like a "django portal" with
> not only information about what is inside the repositories but also
On 9/12/06, Joeboy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think you might be missing the bit that says:"Finally, we change our view code to use RequestContext instead of thebase Context class."You're right! I missed it, then there's no easy solution for your problem ;o)
JoeMarc
>> As far as I can tell the way to do this is to modify *every*
>> *view* *in* *my* *project* to pass either the user or a
>> RequestContext.
>
> The link I gave you is to not do that, but add a processor that will add the
> user to the context.
I think you might be missing the bit that says:
Maybe I read badly, bu I understood that you needed to modify EVERY VIEW to add something to the context of the template, the link I gave you show how to use a Processor, that is "some function called before rendering a template" more or less like an "intermediate view"
Look at the example
> On the linked thread have you checked:
> http://www.b-list.org/weblog/2006/06/14/django-tips-template-context-processors?
> You can use a context processor to make {{ user }} available on all
> templates.
Unless I'm missing something, that link says the same as what I'm
saying, namely that you
On 9/11/06, Ian Holsman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On 11/09/2006, at 10:53 PM, charles sibbald wrote:
>
> > I think Djangoforge should have the ability to host projects as
> > follows:
> >
> > 1. Full projects
> > 2. Useful Classes
> > 3. Useful Functions -
> >
> > similar to a mini
On 9/9/06, Sean Schertell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But what about the actual stuff? So far we've got a couple people
> willing to contribute an app or two. And as I've said, I've got three
> I can put in to get started. I run a smallish web hosting company so
> I'm happy to provide the
6 2:20:55 PMSubject: Re: How about a Django apps public repository?Full applications, patches and snippets? (like templatetags,filters,middlewares...)Forums sucks, any decent mail client can show a list ordered bythreads, and any mail manager can create archives for a list easysearchable by
Googl
ist of projects, so they
can find what they need.
regards
Ian.
> regards
>
> charles.
>
> - Original Message
> From: Marc Fargas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: django-users@googlegroups.com
> Sent: Monday, September 11, 2006 1:26:25 PM
> Subject: Re: How about
- Original Message
> From: Marc Fargas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: django-users@googlegroups.com
> Sent: Monday, September 11, 2006 1:26:25 PM
> Subject: Re: How about a Django apps public repository?
>
>
>
> Oh, I was going for .ORG! Luckylly I read the lis
on problems/resolutionsregardscharles.- Original Message From: Marc Fargas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: django-users@googlegroups.comSent: Monday, September 11, 2006 1:26:25 PMSubject: Re: How about a Django apps public repository?Oh, I was going for .ORG! Luckylly I read the list before
On 9/11/06, Sean Schertell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Wow -- you're fast ;-)
>
Well, this is the web framework for perfectionists with deadlines ;-)
Russ %-)
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Oh, I was going for .ORG! Luckylly I read the list before going for it ;)
If you, or another volunteer can setup a system (debian etch
preferred) I can go on configuring the mailling lists, the TRAC
hosting, SVN repositories and so on (and some scripts to manage them).
It would be better to use
On 9/11/06, Ian Holsman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I've nearly got something together now.
> I just need to add some basic templates for it.
>
> Give me a day or two to get it up ;-)
>
Wonderful!
--
I like python!
My Blog: http://www.donews.net/limodou
UliPad Site:
I've nearly got something together now.
I just need to add some basic templates for it.
Give me a day or two to get it up ;-)
regards
Ian
On 11/09/2006, at 12:52 PM, Sean Schertell wrote:
>
> Okay then, let's do it :-)
>
> I can get started in October putting this together. I have servers,
>
Okay then, let's do it :-)
I can get started in October putting this together. I have servers,
bandwidth, and general webdev skills. I've registered djangoforge.net
for us to use, and I can commit to maintaining the site.
Any other volunteers for helping to develop the system? Any other
I do think that having a starting base of content is important;
however, in my opinion a substantial chunk of the usefulness for such a
project is to also provide a common ground for *developing*
contrib-type apps. In addition, it might be worth our while to seek out
some folks listed on the wiki
On 9/9/06, Sean Schertell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Funny how in a "room" full of web developers, lots of us havebandwidth and servers for hosting this stuff. ;-)Sure, right now we have 4 volunteers to provide the hosting and bandwidth, including a Tier 1 o_O now it's time to look about who
cific to Django and would be willing to use it also for
> this purpose.
>
> - Original Message
> From: Marc Fargas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: django-users@googlegroups.com
> Sent: Saturday, September 9, 2006 1:01:22 PM
> Subject: Re: How about a Django apps pu
AIL PROTECTED]>To: django-users@googlegroups.comSent: Saturday, September 9, 2006 1:01:22 PMSubject: Re: How about a Django apps public repository?On 9/8/06, Jeff Forcier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Well, I would imagine that many other Djangonauts have their owncheapish hosting that they use
On 9/8/06, Jeff Forcier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well, I would imagine that many other Djangonauts have their owncheapish hosting that they use for personal websites or other projects,which are more than capable of handling Trac. I mean, I can't be theonly person who already has a $40/mo VPS
Sean Schertell wrote:
>
> Any other contributors?
I've got a handful of templatetags, which while somewhat outdated
(built against ~0.91) should still be useful. I also have a (very)
small forums app which I plan on expanding when I find the time,
although it would need some cleanup to use
On 9/9/06, Sean Schertell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm willing to invest the time and bandwidth to get this thing off
> the ground. And it sounds like a lot of folks would be happy to have
> such a repository. But if we want to make it work, it has to have
> some content from the very
I'm willing to invest the time and bandwidth to get this thing off
the ground. And it sounds like a lot of folks would be happy to have
such a repository. But if we want to make it work, it has to have
some content from the very beginning. So how many of you actually
have code that you
Marc Fargas wrote:
> I like the idea of the Cheeshop and more the one of different TRACs, but on
> the three options given, hosting TRACs is not as easy, Cheeshop and google
> are free.hosting a TRAC isn't. dejavu doesn't seem an option if you need to
> wait for an invite code for every project.
I''ve been looking at some of the django projects at code.google.com and all I saw have empty subversion repositories... I like the idea of the Cheeshop and more the one of different TRACs, but on the three options given, hosting TRACs is not as easy, Cheeshop and google are
free.hosting a TRAC
Hey Djangoers,
check out www.devjavu.com
looks cool
PS: www.tracOS.com
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com
To
>From exploring Google Code a short bit, I'm not positive it's the best
medium, at least if we want any decent discussion or Web-based
documentation. Yes, one could hold discussions via the Issues, but
that's pretty gimpy for any discussion that does not fit well as a
trouble ticket. And one
On Sep 8, 2006, at 7:22 AM, Sean Schertell wrote:
>
> Very interesting points. Does anyone have any thoughts on using
> Google code hosting for this idea? Anyone know off the top of their
> heads whether or not we'd be able to create a Django "category"
> within Google or would it just sort of be
Very interesting points. Does anyone have any thoughts on using
Google code hosting for this idea? Anyone know off the top of their
heads whether or not we'd be able to create a Django "category"
within Google or would it just sort of be lumped in with all the
other Python stuff?
Sean
I'd like to note that this is not the first time this has come up,
although I don't wish to imply we should not be discussing it (it seems
to be one of those issues that comes up periodically).
http://groups.google.com/group/django-users/browse_frm/thread/5e5a61a14c2e519a
There was also a
On 9/8/06, Wade Leftwich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Ned Batchelder wrote:
> > Why not use the existing Python Cheeseshop
> > (http://cheeseshop.python.org/pypi) for this? Advantages:
> >
> > 1) You don't have to build anything, it's already there.
> > 2) More visibility for Django: with a
Ned Batchelder wrote:
> Why not use the existing Python Cheeseshop
> (http://cheeseshop.python.org/pypi) for this? Advantages:
>
> 1) You don't have to build anything, it's already there.
> 2) More visibility for Django: with a Django-specific repository, only
> Django developers will see the
Why not use the existing Python Cheeseshop
(http://cheeseshop.python.org/pypi) for this? Advantages:
1) You don't have to build anything, it's already there.
2) More visibility for Django: with a Django-specific repository, only
Django developers will see the packages. In the cheeseshop, all
+1, great idea!
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL
Hey thanks for all the positive feedback on this. It seems like lots
of folks share my sentiments. That's nice :-)
It would be really nice to hear the devs' thoughts on the subject.
Adrian, Jacob, Simon? A penny for your thoughts?
Ironically, the whole point of this idea is to avoid
+1 for me too it would be great for me to lear how other people
code... And of course It will help everybody to have a standardized
way to do things in Django...
eg. a Django Blog
Picio
2006/9/7, limodou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> +1
>
> I also suggested similar subject before.
>
> --
> I like
+1
I also suggested similar subject before.
--
I like python!
My Blog: http://www.donews.net/limodou
UliPad Site: http://wiki.woodpecker.org.cn/moin/UliPad
UliPad Maillist: http://groups.google.com/group/ulipad
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message
I really like the idea too.
One suggestion, though... for us new and dumb folks, it would be good
if the apps were as standalone as possible and could really be dropped
in and started working.
Good docs would be an added bonus.
But that's just the dumb guy talkin'.
Quoting fynali ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> +1
votes+=1 # from me too! :)
--
Jeremy Kelley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
gpg 1024D/EAB7CA38 6FF4 483B D7EA A09C A3E0 1CE1 F0A4 8C8E EAB7 CA38
The Christian ideal has not been tried and found wanting; it has been
found difficult and left untried. - G.K.
Sean Schertell wrote:
> Am I alone on this? If I created such a repository would anyone use it?
Why not just use SourceForge[1] as repository and just keep a list of
django-related projects on the django main site?
Barry
[1] Or similar.
+1
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more
I am intersted too in such project.
If you need some help... drop me an email :)
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to
On Thu, 2006-09-07 at 13:50 +0900, Sean Schertell wrote:
> I wonder how many of us are writing nearly identical apps at any
> given time. For example, I just hired a guy to write a really basic
> newsletter app for my project. Now I'm working on a fairly typical
> "upcoming events"
I started thinking of writing one, and have got the basic data model
and how I think it would operate worked out.
it's just a matter of getting enthused enough to actually sit down
and write it.
regards
Ian
On 07/09/2006, at 2:50 PM, Sean Schertell wrote:
>
> I wonder how many of us are
I wonder how many of us are writing nearly identical apps at any
given time. For example, I just hired a guy to write a really basic
newsletter app for my project. Now I'm working on a fairly typical
"upcoming events" schedule. And soon I'll be working on a simple
photo gallery that makes
56 matches
Mail list logo
