Re: Improving performance of lighttpd, flup and django-fcgi.py combo

2006-04-06 Thread jtm
James Bennett wrote: > On 4/6/06, jtm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Does this combination of software mean that for every request > > django is starting from scratch and having to re-import everything? > > No, pretty much the whole point of FastCGI is that you have a > long-running process

Re: Improving performance of lighttpd, flup and django-fcgi.py combo

2006-04-06 Thread James Bennett
On 4/6/06, jtm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Does this combination of software mean that for every request > django is starting from scratch and having to re-import everything? No, pretty much the whole point of FastCGI is that you have a long-running process which handles lots of requests,

Improving performance of lighttpd, flup and django-fcgi.py combo

2006-04-06 Thread jtm
Hi, I've just got lighttpd running under Mac OS X 10.3.9 and I am using Georg Bauer's django-fcgi.py as the dispatcher. django is .91. The machine I am running it on is, admittedly, pretty lightweight (G4 400 MHz, 832MB), but I have not seen much improvement over the development server. The