Re: MS SQL Django suport is stable?

2006-06-22 Thread Douglas Campos
i wait the day when lighty + flup + django would be supported officially by the official docs :) just my 0.02 On 6/22/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi folks, > > Just to throw more fuel on the fire :) > > The missing part that everybody is forgetting is the Database

Re: MS SQL Django suport is stable?

2006-06-22 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi folks,Just to throw more fuel on the fire :)The missing part that everybody is forgetting is the Database Connector setup.  Every distribution (and I've tried a whole bunch) does it differently.  Installing the connector for mysql or postgres is easy if you are experienced, but not easy if you

Re: MS SQL Django suport is stable?

2006-06-22 Thread mamcxyz
> If you managed to get it compiling and working, well done, a lot of people > already stop at that point. In contrast with the other compilings, I found lighttpd is easy (except that the info I first read not talk about the switch to enable fastcgi) > Was this only because of the

Re: MS SQL Django suport is stable?

2006-06-22 Thread Lucas Vogelsang
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 mamcxyz wrote: > Yes, apt/yum is the way to go. Unfortunally, the packages > availables for CentOS 3 are not > who uses centos? :P I use Ubuntu. It's up to date and has a lot of packages available. Debian would be my second choice. regards,

Re: MS SQL Django suport is stable?

2006-06-21 Thread Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven
On 6/21/06, mamcxyz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Exactly the point: You don't know my situation and simply tell "switch > your EXPERIENCE to product XX... is easy!!" is a dangerous proposition. That's because most people never had to work in mixed environment shops. I get to support Novell

Re: MS SQL Django suport is stable?

2006-06-21 Thread mamcxyz
Yes, apt/yum is the way to go. Unfortunally, the packages availables for CentOS 3 are not Thanks... --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to

Re: MS SQL Django suport is stable?

2006-06-21 Thread Lucas Vogelsang
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, mamcxyz wrote: > Wow! > > Exactly the point: You don't know my situation and simply tell > "switch your EXPERIENCE to product XX... is easy!!" is a dangerous > proposition. > It depends on which infrastructure you have. > But, before to start

Re: MS SQL Django suport is stable?

2006-06-21 Thread Jeremy Dunck
On 6/21/06, mamcxyz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2- From the info I get, Apache support is not widely spread, mod-python > can have memory leaks?? (Maybe was a past version?) or the RAM > requeriments are more than my actual VPS, so I need to chosee other > option, and in a lot of places and

Re: MS SQL Django suport is stable?

2006-06-21 Thread DavidA
mamcxyz, I've had pretty good luck with Fedora Core 4. Here are my (terse) notes from setting up Django and my blog on FC4 a couple of weeks ago. Note that FC4 already had MySQL 4.1.x and Python 2.4.1 and Apache 2.0.54 (with mod_python) so I just went with them. On Windows I use MySQL 5 but I

Re: MS SQL Django suport is stable?

2006-06-21 Thread mamcxyz
Wow! Exactly the point: You don't know my situation and simply tell "switch your EXPERIENCE to product XX... is easy!!" is a dangerous proposition. But, before to start to make claims: - Yes, I'm from a Windows background, and I found django *itself* easy to grasp. However, something that is

Re: MS SQL Django suport is stable?

2006-06-21 Thread Lucas Vogelsang
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Jeremy Dunck wrote: > On 6/21/06, Lucas Vogelsang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I think we pretty all know how painfull this is(not at all). >> Django on it's own is very easy to setup on any Linux. Maybe the >> packages you needed were hard to

Re: MS SQL Django suport is stable?

2006-06-21 Thread Douglas Campos
period? On 6/21/06, Jeremy Dunck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 6/21/06, Lucas Vogelsang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I think we pretty all know how painfull this is(not at all). Django on > > it's own is very easy to setup on any Linux. Maybe the packages you > > needed were hard to

Re: MS SQL Django suport is stable?

2006-06-21 Thread Jeremy Dunck
On 6/21/06, Lucas Vogelsang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think we pretty all know how painfull this is(not at all). Django on > it's own is very easy to setup on any Linux. Maybe the packages you > needed were hard to install. Wow, that was amazingly unhelpful. mamcxyz is coming from

Re: MS SQL Django suport is stable?

2006-06-21 Thread Tom Tobin
On 6/21/06, mamcxyz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm triying to setup a linux box with django, and frankly, I never > spect this task can be so HARD. Every step is a nightmare, I need > compile everything, the YUM/APT only have out-dated versions of the > things I need to run django. I have

Re: MS SQL Django suport is stable?

2006-06-21 Thread Lucas Vogelsang
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, You are talking rubbish. Maybe LFS(Linux from scratch) is hard to install, but on a debian/ubuntu it takes about 5mins. you mean that all the packages you need have up to date versions for windows but not for linux? I think we pretty all know

Re: MS SQL Django suport is stable?

2006-06-21 Thread Lucas Vogelsang
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 mamcxyz wrote: > Ok. Thanks > > If some progress is made I'm can test it. So back to mysql :( > It's progress, not regress. ;) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Signed with GPG & Enigmail - see

Re: MS SQL Django suport is stable?

2006-06-21 Thread mamcxyz
Also take in account that this "not problem, switch to XXX because is linux" mean lost of expertise. I'm triying to setup a linux box with django, and frankly, I never spect this task can be so HARD. Every step is a nightmare, I need compile everything, the YUM/APT only have out-dated versions

Re: MS SQL Django suport is stable?

2006-06-21 Thread Jeremy Dunck
On 6/21/06, aCiD2 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Also, out of curiousity - why do you -need- MSSQL? I -need- MSSQL in the same sense that I -need- computers at all. Strictly speaking, I don't. But it's very useful. I "need" it because I have a few hundred thousand customers using an application

Re: MS SQL Django suport is stable?

2006-06-21 Thread aCiD2
Why not postgres? I've grown to love this db system, you might too. Also, out of curiousity - why do you -need- MSSQL? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group,

Re: MS SQL Django suport is stable?

2006-06-20 Thread mamcxyz
Ok. Thanks If some progress is made I'm can test it. So back to mysql :( --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com To

Re: MS SQL Django suport is stable?

2006-06-20 Thread Adrian Holovaty
On 6/20/06, mamcxyz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is MSSQL support good for a production site? No. I haven't heard from anybody who's actually using it, and I can't test because I don't run WIndows. Adrian -- Adrian Holovaty holovaty.com | djangoproject.com

MS SQL Django suport is stable?

2006-06-20 Thread mamcxyz
Is MSSQL support good for a production site? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group,