On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 2:32 PM, ramu...@gmail.com wrote:
> Does anyone know about any solutions for keeping data bigger, than 1
> mb in memcached ?
sure, use the filesystem.
seriously; nginx can serve static data from disk just as fast as
memcached does from RAM.
--
Javier
This can works on the base of this snippet
http://www.djangosnippets.org/snippets/488/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-us...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send
Does anyone know about any solutions for keeping data bigger, than 1
mb in memcached ?
This is no big deal to cut big data to 1mb pieces before setting and
merge this pieces after getting from memcached. And this algorithm can
work transparently for users.
--
You received this message because
Nevermind. I missed the part where webfaction requires you to set up
memcached as an app and start it.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to
I'm trying to use memcache for caching, but when I turn it on, the
site proxy errors out. Looking in my error log, I'm seeing tons of
errors like:
Invalid URI in request get views.decorators.cache.cache_header.grm./
some/url/
suggestions?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You
5 matches
Mail list logo