On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 09:47 -0700, barbara shaurette wrote:
> We're building a couple of different projects - one social network-y
> site, and one that's bloglike. So each has its own unique database,
> but they do share one common set of content.
>
> I've created a third "common" project to
On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 11:53 -0700, barbara shaurette wrote:
> *bump*
>
> Seriously - anyone have any ideas?
Come on, Barbara, it's only been just over 24 hours since you posted.
For something this complex, you're audience of prospective respondees is
pretty limited. After all, you're basically
*bump*
Seriously - anyone have any ideas?
On Oct 8, 11:46 am, barbara shaurette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Actually, that's been suggested ... and considered. The problem is
> that these two initial projects aren't going to be the only ones.
> There will be more sites in the future, all
Actually, that's been suggested ... and considered. The problem is
that these two initial projects aren't going to be the only ones.
There will be more sites in the future, all slightly different, but
all sharing this common type of content. And putting *all* of them on
the same database is,
On Oct 8, 12:47 pm, barbara shaurette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We're building a couple of different projects - one social network-y
> site, and one that's bloglike. So each has its own unique database,
> but they do share one common set of content.
You'll almost certainly have better luck
We're building a couple of different projects - one social network-y
site, and one that's bloglike. So each has its own unique database,
but they do share one common set of content.
I've created a third "common" project to hold the base models, at
least - the model inheritance seems to be
6 matches
Mail list logo
