Re: [slightly offtopic] Which Python are people using on OSX?

After a bit of going back and forth I'm now using MacPorts more or less exclusively since it makes it easy to have multiple version (2.3, 2.4, 2.5, 2.6 and 3.0) installed in parallel. -- Horst On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 11:53 PM, Russell Keith-Magee wrote: > On Fri, Feb 6,

RE: [slightly offtopic] Which Python are people using on OSX?

To: django-users@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [slightly offtopic] Which Python are people using on OSX? On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 6:07 AM, cjl <cjl...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I've been on Windows and Linux for many years, and recently picked up > a Macbook Pro for the fun of it. > &

Re: [slightly offtopic] Which Python are people using on OSX?

On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 6:07 AM, cjl wrote: > > I've been on Windows and Linux for many years, and recently picked up > a Macbook Pro for the fun of it. > > To be honest, I'm kind of disappointed with the Python included with > Leopard. I spent some time googling around to see

Re: [slightly offtopic] Which Python are people using on OSX?

On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 7:07 PM, cjl wrote: > Honestly, I'm leaning towards option number 5. I'm just wondering what > other Django folks are using. I'm using MacPorts. It's the practical way. (x11? really?. Which version are you trying?) I'm using those ports: # port

Re: [slightly offtopic] Which Python are people using on OSX?

On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 1:07 PM, cjl wrote: > 1. Use the stock Python, slightly outdated 2.5.1, with weird and > incomplete modules. > 2. Compile Python myself from source. > 3. Use MacPorts Python. Anyone know why the nearly all of Xorg gets > built as a dependency? > 4. Use

Re: [slightly offtopic] Which Python are people using on OSX?

On Feb 5, 2009, at 10:07 PM, cjl wrote: > 2. Compile Python myself from source. Easy peasy :) Cheers, -- PA. http://alt.textdrive.com/nanoki/ --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users"