Re: SqlAlchemy branch status or composite keys?

2008-02-25 Thread Malcolm Tredinnick
On Mon, 2008-02-25 at 13:33 -0800, Mike Driscoll wrote: > Hi, > > I am doing research on alternative Python Web Frameworks that I can > use at my place of work. We use legacy SQL Server and have many > databases from various vendors which include composite (multi-column) > primary keys of the no

Re: SqlAlchemy branch status or composite keys?

2008-02-25 Thread Ben Ford
Hi Mike, As far as I know the newest body of work regarding SA is the tranquil project on google code. Have a look here Hope it help, I haven't read through enough of the source to know if it does what you want. Cheers Ben On 25/02/2008, Mike Driscoll <[EMAIL P

Re: SqlAlchemy branch status or composite keys?

2008-02-25 Thread Jacob Kaplan-Moss
Hi Mike -- The SQLAlchemy branch is defunct. Jacob --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this g

SqlAlchemy branch status or composite keys?

2008-02-25 Thread Mike Driscoll
Hi, I am doing research on alternative Python Web Frameworks that I can use at my place of work. We use legacy SQL Server and have many databases from various vendors which include composite (multi-column) primary keys of the non-integer variety. Does anyone know how Ticket 373 is coming along or