No, not using @user_passes_test anywhere. Thanks though!
On Dec 6, 1:43 pm, yml <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> TP are you using @user_passes_test decorator with urlresolvers (url,
> reverse ...). I had a problem similar to what you are describing and I
> finally find out that this problem was
TP are you using @user_passes_test decorator with urlresolvers (url,
reverse ...). I had a problem similar to what you are describing and I
finally find out that this problem was infact related to the bug
described there:
http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/5925
I hope that help
On Dec 6,
On Dec 6, 12:40 pm, TP <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I thought I needed multiple Apache's since I frequently have several
> concurrent requests. The actual dynamic python processing is quick,
> but since clients could be connected for relatively long (slow
> connections, etc), I thought I'd need
I thought I needed multiple Apache's since I frequently have several
concurrent requests. The actual dynamic python processing is quick,
but since clients could be connected for relatively long (slow
connections, etc), I thought I'd need multiple Apache's talking to
each. Since Django says it's
On Dec 6, 12:04 pm, TP <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been using Django for the past few months and had great results
> with Apache and mod_python. However, I'd like to try and reduce the
> amount of memory that is used by having multiple Apache's each with
> their own copy of my application.
I've been using Django for the past few months and had great results
with Apache and mod_python. However, I'd like to try and reduce the
amount of memory that is used by having multiple Apache's each with
their own copy of my application. I decided to try mod_fastcgi in
Apache and Django's
6 matches
Mail list logo
