I thought that this thread sounded interesting so I had a go creating
several vmware images. The first was an Ubuntu which weighed in at
over 500 mb (all sizes are the 'used' portion from df -h), which then
stopped working (I think I _may_ have deleted the kernel image while
trying to save space).
Yes, I've got DSL as well. ISO is 50mb after installing it onto HDD size groing to 150-160mb compress image around 80mb ( without python ,django ,svn) DSL also include a lot of tools - so if remove them them -may be possible to get image around 30-40mb
haven't tried any other distro but I think it
I saw this a while back:
"""
Python Web Developer Appliance
includes a complete set of tools for developing and deploying web
applications using Python
"""
http://www.vmware.com/vmtn/appliances/directory/289
It is 448MB but includes quite a lot more than just python, django and sqlite.
On 15/
Michael,
It's a great idea, but the images do seem a little large - if you're
running only python and sqlite, would one of the smaller distributions
not be more suitable as a base? There are plenty of floppy and
business-card distributions out there which are around 70mb (Damn
Small Linux springs
Hi all,It is posssible to setup Qemu ( platform independent ) http://fabrice.bellard.free.fr/qemu/and run djanog on it.I've test in with debian etch ,python2.3.5
,django-trunk+sqlite3, no apache -run as django dev server.The whole image around 200mb with qcow compressed formatwithout compr = 449mb
Op vr, 04-08-2006 te 15:43 -0700, schreef Joseph Heck:
> Ah - brilliant. (Thanks for the "Shrink" tip - I looked around and
> couldn't find anywhere to invoke it up). That's got it down to just at
> 1Gb.
An Ubuntu live-cd fits on a 650 MiB CD-R, while it includes lots of
software that you don't n
Ah - brilliant. (Thanks for the "Shrink" tip - I looked around and couldn't find anywhere to invoke it up). That's got it down to just at 1Gb.-joeOn 8/4/06,
Joseph Heck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Cool - I'll give it a go right now and check...-joeOn 8/4/06, Jay Parlar <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
O
Cool - I'll give it a go right now and check...-joeOn 8/4/06, Jay Parlar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 8/4/06, Joseph Heck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:> For those interested, I've worked up a VMWare image. It's 1.2Gb (zipped),> and I'm SLOWLY transfering it around so that we can get it hosted via> B
On 8/4/06, Joseph Heck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For those interested, I've worked up a VMWare image. It's 1.2Gb (zipped),
> and I'm SLOWLY transfering it around so that we can get it hosted via
> BitTorrent with Jacob's assistance.
>
> In the meantime if you are really, really anxious to get r
On 8/4/06, Joseph Heck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
http://www.rhonabwy.com/wp/2006/08/04/making-a-django-development-imge-for-vmware/";>Making
> a django development image for VMWare.
That's a slightly broken link.
Working:
http://www.rhonabwy.com/wp/2006/08/04/making-a-django-development-image-
For those interested, I've worked up a VMWare image. It's 1.2Gb (zipped), and I'm SLOWLY transfering it around so that we can get it hosted via BitTorrent with Jacob's assistance.In the meantime if you are really, really anxious to get rolling with it... I posted up the recipe for how I created the
Personally I use a custom uniform server
(http://sourceforge.net/projects/miniserver) which is basically a
zip-file that you unpack on your Win32 windows system, and you're ready
to django.
This way you get apache2/mysql/phpmyadmin/etc. and django running in no
time.
To me that seems easier than
Please post a link when you get the image online, I would love to give
it a spin.
/mac
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-users@googleg
On 8/1/06, Joseph Heck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, the baseline image that I've just knocked together (desktop, full
> servers, etc) is running in the 3Gb file range (uncompressed...)
>
> I'm building it with VMWare Server - I don't see an option for shrinking the
> VM image. I was planning
Well, the baseline image that I've just knocked together (desktop, full servers, etc) is running in the 3Gb file range (uncompressed...)I'm building it with VMWare Server - I don't see an option for shrinking the VM image. I was planning on Zipping it to see what compression I could get - but it's
I agree with Jacob, full image (with MySQL and PostgreSQL as well).
This is actually the setup I used at a contract gig. I had a VMWare
image setup and configured for doing both development and deployment.
So after I leave, if anyone needs to make modifications, then can just
run the VM image on
On Aug 1, 2006, at 11:40 AM, Joseph Heck wrote:
> I was fiddling with a VMWare image for running and developing
> Django with
> the intention of posted the results up for anyone to use, and I got
> myself
> tied all in knots. So let me ask the community: what would be the most
> useful:
>
> 1)
I was fiddling with a VMWare image for running and developing Django with the intention of posted the results up for anyone to use, and I got myself tied all in knots. So let me ask the community: what would be the most useful:
1) a light VMWare image (couple hundred Mb) that was completely command
18 matches
Mail list logo
