te up how I installed all versions from 2.3
up through 3.0 on my system[1]. To switch between them, I just use
python on the command line. So if I want 2.4 I type
``python2.4`` etc. One thing I didn't mention is that the ``python``
command (without a version) is just a symbolic link to the default
(``p
On Jan 27, 4:11 pm, Steve Holden wrote:
> DragonSlayre wrote:
>
> > On Jan 27, 3:15 pm, Steve Holden wrote:
>
> >> DragonSlayre wrote:
> > How do you do this?
>
> http://www.swc.scipy.org/lec/shell02.html
>
> regards
> Steve
WOW, that explains it
DragonSlayre wrote:
>
> On Jan 27, 3:15 pm, Steve Holden <holden...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> DragonSlayre wrote:
>> That's most easily done by controlling your PATH so the the version you
>> want to prefer is found first when python is called for.
>>
>
like export PYTHONHOME=/usr/
lib/python2.5
I'm just hacking around as I couldn't find anything explicit enough to
say how to change the python version.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django
On Jan 27, 3:15 pm, Steve Holden <holden...@gmail.com> wrote:
> DragonSlayre wrote:
> That's most easily done by controlling your PATH so the the version you
> want to prefer is found first when python is called for.
>
> regards
&g
nce 2.6 is installed.
>
That's most easily done by controlling your PATH so the the version you
want to prefer is found first when python is called for.
regards
Steve
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Googl
On Jan 27, 1:41 pm, wrote:
> Does this help? Found via google and ubuntu
> forums.https://launchpad.net/~doko/+archive
>
> Sorry, I run Debian (which ubuntu is based on), I just apt-get install all of
> the
> available python versions and then run /usr/bin/python to
On Mon Jan 26 16:28 , DragonSlayre sent:
>
>Ok, well I reinstalled ubuntu.
>
>It'd still be good to know how to change python versions easily, if
>anybody knows how to do this - it seems like it's not documented
>anywhere :(
Does this help? Found via google and ubuntu forums.
Ok, well I reinstalled ubuntu.
It'd still be good to know how to change python versions easily, if
anybody knows how to do this - it seems like it's not documented
anywhere :(
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Hi,
I've made a total mess of python (I installed python2.6 from source,
installed python 2.6 from an installer (http://jaredforsyth.com/
content/install-python-26-ubuntu)). The source version installed
into /usr/local/, and the installer version installed into /usr/.
After installing python
Thanks for the clarification.
On Jan 16, 2:18 pm, Daniel Roseman <roseman.dan...@googlemail.com>
wrote:
> On Jan 16, 7:03 pm, Ty <brownellty...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Follow-up question:
> > I have a project that was created using the 1.0.2 version. Is it a
>
On Jan 16, 7:03 pm, Ty <brownellty...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Follow-up question:
> I have a project that was created using the 1.0.2 version. Is it a
> good idea to basically recreate the project and apps using the newest
> version of the django-admin.py file, and then migrate th
colons
> in Windows) where the Python interpreter will look for additional
> modules (in this case Django) in addition to the system-wide 'site-packages'
> directory.
>
> There is a description on how to update PATH that could be of help to
> you:
>
> http://docs.djangoproject.com/en
method.
Follow-up question:
I have a project that was created using the 1.0.2 version. Is it a
good idea to basically recreate the project and apps using the newest
version of the django-admin.py file, and then migrate the code over?
I'm assuming so.
On Jan 16, 1:47 pm, Ty <brownellty...@g
http://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/topics/install/#installing-the-development-version
I'm currently on a Windows system and stuck on step #3. I have no idea
how to continue because I don't know what an "environment variable"
actually is and what they do.
I've looked into how
updates
> would be lost, overwritten by the other one).
>
> This is what I have in mind. Add a version field to the WikiPage model
> which is automatically incremented on every update. The system should
> not allow saving an existing page with version (in db) >= version (in
>
. Add a version field to the WikiPage model
which is automatically incremented on every update. The system should
not allow saving an existing page with version (in db) >= version (in
data to be saved). This is probably done in save().
I've tried overriding the models's save() method, but I'm alw
10:15 pm, Pablo Ruiz Múzquiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hmm. That is exactly what I meant with "No matter what I do with
> > Apache's PythonPath".
> > I have that same configuration you posted and /admin (and other stuff)
> > won't work (m
On Dec 8, 10:15 pm, Pablo Ruiz Múzquiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hmm. That is exactly what I meant with "No matter what I do with
> Apache's PythonPath".
> I have that same configuration you posted and /admin (and other stuff)
> won't work (most certainly b
Hmm. That is exactly what I meant with "No matter what I do with
Apache's PythonPath".
I have that same configuration you posted and /admin (and other stuff)
won't work (most certainly because of the django version mismatch)
The two errrors are "no module named urls" a
t; year ago and a brand new SVN one, sharing the same server.
>
> Django 097 lives at /srv/whatever/django097/django while Django SVN at
> the usual site-packages location.
>
> No matter what I do with Apache's PythonPath, the virtualhost
> referring
> to the old project will
v/whatever/django097/django while Django SVN at
the usual site-packages location.
No matter what I do with Apache's PythonPath, the virtualhost referring
to the old project will load the SVN version and, thus, /admin and some
template handling will fail to load.
Any clues? Thanks in advan
I tried it out David, and it is simple and it works, I was just about
to make the same exact thing. Thank you!
On 4 okt, 15:21, David Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've created a Google group for discussing possible improvements to the
> django-reversion project. The group is called
lm_list' in your posts the only place I find it referenced is in the
{% url %} tag that is generating the error messages and in the error
messages. It's nowhere mentioned in the urls.py that you posted, so I don't
see how you could expect {% url %} for it to work?
>
> This is all strange, as this
particular film.
edit_film_list is a function that shows a list of films with an edit
link beside that particular film.
This is all strange, as this application is running fine on an old svn
version of django (pre 1.0).
Adam
--
You back your data up on the same planet?
http://www.monkeez.org
PGP key
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 4:36 PM, AdamC <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm running the latest checkout using svn as per the download
> instructions on the djangoproject site.
>
>
OK, now that you've confirmed that and I take a closer look at the
erroryou have:
{%url films.views.edit_film_list
2008/10/20 Karen Tracey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 2008/10/20 AdamC <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>> They all import fine.
>>
>> I do have @login_required at the beginning of a few functions. Has
>> this changed since v1.0?
>
> You mean since 0.96? It certainly hasn't changed since 1.0, and I don't
>
2008/10/20 AdamC <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> They all import fine.
>
> I do have @login_required at the beginning of a few functions. Has
> this changed since v1.0?
>
You mean since 0.96? It certainly hasn't changed since 1.0, and I don't
believe @login_required was changed between 0.96 and 1.0. (If
Reverse for
>>>> 'films.films.views.edit_film_list' with arguments '()' and keyword
>>>> arguments '{}' not found.
>>>> 1 | Film list | >>> href="{%url films.views.add_film %}">Add a film | Edit | Search | Logout
>>>>
>&g
ments '()' and keyword
>>> arguments '{}' not found.
>>> 1 | Film list | >> href="{%url films.views.add_film %}">Add a film | Edit | Search | Logout
>>>
>>> The part that is red in this error report is the {%url - has this
>>> changed si
Caught an exception while rendering: Reverse for
>> 'films.films.views.edit_film_list' with arguments '()' and keyword
>> arguments '{}' not found.
>> 1 | Film list | > href="{%url films.views.add_film %}">Add a film | Edit | Search | Logout
>>
>> The part that is red in t
s '()' and keyword
> arguments '{}' not found.
> 1 | Film list | href="{%url films.views.add_film %}">Add a film | Edit | Search | Logout
>
> The part that is red in this error report is the {%url - has this
> changed since version 1?
>
> Any other advice on how
On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 2:25 PM, AdamC <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm migrating my application (a simple film database) to another server.
>
> I installed version 1.0 of django on the new server and set up apache
> with mod_python (which was the same setup on my old se
I'm migrating my application (a simple film database) to another server.
I installed version 1.0 of django on the new server and set up apache
with mod_python (which was the same setup on my old server).
However, I seem to be having some problems. When I try and login to my
application (which
.
jonknee wrote:
> On Oct 1, 11:25 am, David Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I've just released an open-source version control application for
>> Django. It is available for download from Google code.
>
> Neat idea! I installed it and while it works for rolling back, it
for
the currently-inactive fullhistory branch. As such, your feedback and
suggestions are vital to making this application as bombproof as possible.
David.
David Hall wrote:
> I've just released an open-source version control application for
> Django. It is available for download from Googl
to your schema. This makes it very easy to integrate with existing
projects.
David.
Bas van Oostveen wrote:
>
> That is exactly what i did for a project :)
>
> When you register a model for versioning, automagicly a new model is
> created which the original model + an 'version-co
That is exactly what i did for a project :)
When you register a model for versioning, automagicly a new model is
created which the original model + an 'version-control' abstract base model
to add things like version numbers, datetimestamps, methods to diff between
versions etc. Also all unique
On Oct 1, 11:25 am, David Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've just released an open-source version control application for
> Django. It is available for download from Google code.
Neat idea! I installed it and while it works for rolling back, it does
not work bring back deleted
What if, for each model under version control, you'd create an
identical table (except the ID field would be a foreign key, not a
primary one). Any time a migration is run on that model, the same
migration could be run on the "twin" table, too.
Erik
On 02.10.2008, at 18:34,
to the database, how will
> django-reversions work when you want to undo and go back to an earlier
> version of a record in this table ? (which didn't have this change)
>
> The fields in the database/model now do not match against the serialized
> copy right ?
>
> Bas
>
you want to undo and go back to an earlier
version of a record in this table ? (which didn't have this change)
The fields in the database/model now do not match against the serialized
copy right ?
Bas
On Wed, 2008-10-01 at 16:52 +0100, David Hall wrote:
> This discussion has been moved from dja
2008/10/2 David Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Marek Stępniowski wrote:
>> How does django-reversion deal with relationships between Django models?
>>
>> Version-controlling relationships between entities is an Achilles heel
>> of such applications. I have read dja
This is best explained by example.
Let's say you have two models, Foo and Bar, both under version control.
>>> class Bar(models.Model):
... pass
...
>>> class Foo(models.Model):
... bar = models.ForeignKey(Bar)
If you save an instance of Foo, then the primary key
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 5:25 PM, David Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I've just released an open-source version control application for
> Django. It is available for download from Google code.
>
> http://code.google.com/p/django-reversion/
>
> Features include:
&g
-reversion deals with maintaining versions of the model data.
It does not integrate with subversion. Instead, it uses the django
serialization framework to store serialized models in a special database
table.
David.
David Hall wrote:
> I've just released an open-source version control applicat
I've just released an open-source version control application for
Django. It is available for download from Google code.
http://code.google.com/p/django-reversion/
Features include:
- Roll back to any point in a model's history - an unlimited undo
facility!
- Recover deleted models
th I. Do I need a number in
> > my user name on .90?
>
> In my original post, I said that it could be something like the database
> port number. You apparently didn't check that. The database port number
> in the settings file you posted is a string, not an integer. That's
> a
umber
in the settings file you posted is a string, not an integer. That's
almost certainly the problem. You will not be able to simply use a 1.0
settings file with 0.90. There are lots of differences, some large and
some small. Basically, everything on the BackwardsIncompatibleChanges
page in the wi
On Sep 19, 9:18 am, KillaBee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Sep 18, 8:34 pm, Malcolm Tredinnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 15:13 -0700, Carol wrote:
> > > As far as I can see, django-admin.py doesn't have a subcommand called
> > > init.
>
> > It did in 0.90, We're
On Sep 18, 8:34 pm, Malcolm Tredinnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 15:13 -0700, Carol wrote:
> > As far as I can see, django-admin.py doesn't have a subcommand called
> > init.
>
> It did in 0.90, We're talking about something release in mid-November,
> 2005: things have
On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 15:13 -0700, Carol wrote:
> As far as I can see, django-admin.py doesn't have a subcommand called
> init.
It did in 0.90, We're talking about something release in mid-November,
2005: things have changed a little since then. :-)
Regards,
Malcolm
g
or application back in and checking again.
Seriously, if debugging this sort of thing is going to be a problem for
you, using 0.90 is going to be a large world of pain. It was released
three years ago and there have been four major releases since then with
many changes in between. Hardly anybody
As far as I can see, django-admin.py doesn't have a subcommand called
init.
Where you meaning syncdb or startapp or start project or ?
Have you done manage.py validate to check your syntax and then
manage.py syncdb to upload your new schema to the database?
Also check your settings.py file that
I am working with django .90, and and 1.0. I have a Mysql db in
setting.py that I can login with Mysql Admin.
I am trying to link Django with this DB. I run this command to do
this.
django-admin.py init I get this error.
The database couldn't be initialized.
an integer is required
I edited
Perhaps you could call a script on the other domain to
update/delete/whatever the cookie in question?
Tim ^,^
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 2:05 PM, Tim Kersten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I didn't think it was possible to delete/modify/create cookies for
> other domains obvious security
I didn't think it was possible to delete/modify/create cookies for
other domains obvious security issues and all than, no?
Tim ^,^
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 1:59 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> hi all
>
> please, i would like to ask for a little help. I am getting
hi all
please, i would like to ask for a little help. I am getting cookie from
another domain for instance called XXX. Them i am parsing it through
some tests and create new cookie also caled XXX. This creates the cookie
from my domain(so i have two cookies with same name but from different
try docs.djangoproject.com
RS
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 12:28 PM, Luka Birsa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello
>
> I'm just starting with Django (I read the djangobook.com) and I've
> upgraded to 1.0. There are quite some changes and I'm wondering is
> there any documentation (as in a good
Hello
I'm just starting with Django (I read the djangobook.com) and I've
upgraded to 1.0. There are quite some changes and I'm wondering is
there any documentation (as in a good book) coming out?
Best regards,
Luka
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message
Thanks. After back-tracking through the updates, I've realised that I
have a problem upgrading to version 7967. 7967 just gives the
500.html page, no Apache error message. So if I can just get 7967
working, that might also fix the problem with later versions too
Thanks again for your
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 7:12 AM, ajo11 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> After upgrading from development version 7933, I'm getting a 500
> Internal Server Error page. This doesn't happen every time.
> Sometimes it gives the expected response & sometimes it gi
the database and pray
it doesn't spontaneously combust.
On Jul 22, 11:36 am, Steve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Recently we migrated from a working version of our site with MySQL
> with the MySIAM engine to Postgresql 8.3.3/Pyscopg2.07. I built/
> installed both on the site and after
On Tue, 2008-07-22 at 13:36 -0700, Steve wrote:
> I ended up rebuilding everything with postgresql 8.29/pyscopg2.07 and
> everything works fine. Email me if you have questions or a similar
> problem as I never figured out why it didn't work with postgresql
> 8.33. I'd like to know what the issue
Recently we migrated from a working version of our site with MySQL
with the MySIAM engine to Postgresql 8.3.3/Pyscopg2.07. I built/
installed both on the site and after some finagling got our site to
connect and ran syncdb successfully. All our unit tests passed, but
the site behaves erratically
Hi,
After upgrading from development version 7933, I'm getting a 500
Internal Server Error page. This doesn't happen every time.
Sometimes it gives the expected response & sometimes it gives a normal
500 page.
I think Apache is OK as another simple django project is working
a time this
> way, but I'm not in a situation where this matters.
>
> On Jul 19, 10:19 pm, Rodrigo Culagovski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Great, thanks for the advice.
> > So, using virtualenv, I basically install two separate environments,
> > one for each django
two separate environments,
> one for each django version, and manually call "\path\to\djangoversion
> \bin\activate.bat" depending on which version I need? Or is there a
> way to activate the correct version directly from the project itself?
> Using Windows for developme
Great, thanks for the advice.
So, using virtualenv, I basically install two separate environments,
one for each django version, and manually call "\path\to\djangoversion
\bin\activate.bat" depending on which version I need? Or is there a
way to activate the correct version dir
se sites, I need to keep the current django
> version on my development machine.
> Question: Is it possible to have two django versions on a single
> machine? Is there a way to tell each project which one to use, maybe
> in settings.py?
> I realize that it might make sense to refactor the ex
, unless I
want to refactor all these sites, I need to keep the current django
version on my development machine.
Question: Is it possible to have two django versions on a single
machine? Is there a way to tell each project which one to use, maybe
in settings.py?
I realize that it might make sense
Hello,
I am a novice. I plan to study whether the design measures can predict
fault-prone classes in Python. Through investigating, Django is a good
experimental subject.
I need the the Django bug and version data. Is there any web API for
accessing the Django bug and version databases
Hi Malcolm,
I've been back through as you suggested and can trace the problem to
revision 7477 which is merging of the Queryset refactor branch into
the trunk. Version 7476 works fine with our application.
I'll have a play with my view code to see if I can see exactly what is
causing
On Wed, 2008-07-02 at 04:47 -0700, Tipan wrote:
> Whilst setting up a new machine for development I took down the latest
> development version of Django (7825). I am now experiencing a Pickle
> error when running my existing application which has been working fine
> on our produc
Whilst setting up a new machine for development I took down the latest
development version of Django (7825). I am now experiencing a Pickle
error when running my existing application which has been working fine
on our production servers for a few months. The error occurs when
using the Cache.set
. Then
overwrite the TEMPLATE_DIRS setting to point to the mobile version of
the templates (and fall back to default templates if there isn't a
mobile specific version). Because every app also gets a default
template you can have a complete mobile site up and running by
creating just one or two mobile base tem
HI there,
I want to produce a version of a site for mobile phones so I will have
to serve up different templates, perhaps on a different subdomain.
Is there a recommended way to go about this? Do I have to recreate all
my views?
Thanks in advance
the mod_python source and compiled against the new python
installation. Then I did the traditional ./configure; make; make
install (with all of the --with-python=... --with-apxs=...). At this
point I have mod_python running, and the error pages report Python
version 2.5.2. Unfortunately, the Python Executable
Latest stable Python version.
Currently it is Python 2.5.2
Regards,
Valts.
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 6:03 PM, bcurtu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Which python version do you use with your django project? Any special
> issue with any
Which python version do you use with your django project? Any special
issue with anyone?
Cheers.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email
On May 5, 2008, at 11:18 AM, Daniel Strasser wrote:
>
> Is it recommended to use the development version for a project that
> starts now (or in a week ;-))
To add to what others have said, use the development version,
definitely, except I would strongly recommend that you use the
On 05-May-08, at 9:48 PM, Daniel Strasser wrote:
> Is it recommended to use the development version for a project that
> starts now (or in a week ;-))
yes - unless you want to miss out on a lot of goodies and are
masochist enough to enjoy upgrading your project through a bunch of
ba
Daniel Strasser wrote:
This is a bit confusing for me, because for me,
development versions are - yeah - for developers. And I'm not
(yet?) :-) a Django core developer.
The development version of django is basically the latest stable, 0.96,
plus lots and lots and lots of bugfixes, feature
nated about Django
> that I don't want to use PHP for a new project that is coming up soon.
>
> Now I'm playing around with the latest "stable" release of Django
> (0.96), but both the tutorials and the documentation expects that you
> are using the development versio
are using the development version (I know the older docs/tuts are
online, too). This is a bit confusing for me, because for me,
development versions are - yeah - for developers. And I'm not
(yet?) :-) a Django core developer.
Is it recommended to use the development version for a project that
is there a dict returning version of
cursor.cursor.fetchall() ?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com
To u
On Apr 10, 1:54 am, Peter Rowell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This means that a python version has to be selected before the PythonPath
> > directive is processed.
>
> "Selected" is not quite the right way to think of it.mod_pythonhas
> the Python interpr
> This means that a python version has to be selected before the PythonPath
> directive is processed.
"Selected" is not quite the right way to think of it. mod_python has
the Python interpreter linked in at build time, not run time. To
change which version you have, you
How can I go about selecting the python version for mod_python to use?
Using PythonPath doesn't seem to be the way to do this, as stated in
the mod_python documentation, this strign is evaluated. This means
that a python version has to be selected before the PythonPath
directive is processed
Thanks James, I'll have a look.
On Mar 3, 4:50 pm, "James Bennett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 10:29 AM, merric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > There is no VIEW called "help_no_cookies" in the promotions.views
> > module. Should there be?
>
> You apparently have an old
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 10:29 AM, merric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There is no VIEW called "help_no_cookies" in the promotions.views
> module. Should there be?
You apparently have an old URL pattern somewhere in your project which
tries to reference such a view; previously this was not an
On Mon, 2008-03-03 at 08:29 -0800, merric wrote:
> I've just tried updating to the latest development version and the
> admin no longer works. I get the following message whenever I try to
> access a DB via the admin:
[...]
> There is no VIEW called "help_no_cookies" i
I've just tried updating to the latest development version and the
admin no longer works. I get the following message whenever I try to
access a DB via the admin:
ViewDoesNotExist at /admin/
Tried help_no_cookies in module promotions.views. Error was: 'module'
object has no attribute
with some functionality (iteration), I make a tag in
svn. Then, this tagged version is deployed at test environment.
Customer checks it etc and if accepted it goes to production (using
svn tag). If not accepted, then fixes are made and next version is
commited into tags at svn. Then it goes into test
exactly, that's what i meant. i usually skip a staging server, for
cost reasons, and configure my dev box to run the same configuration
as my production server. either way, keneth and jarek are right. the
point is that trunk is as safe as you want it to be, or at least as
pain-free as you want.
On 06-Feb-08, at 2:08 PM, Jarek Zgoda wrote:
>> you do have a development environment, right? ;)
>
> I remember one issue just after autoescaping went into trunk, that was
> visible only on sites runnung on FastCGI, so development server/env
> sometimes clearly is not enough to catch
Christian W. Koch napisał(a):
> i'm no django expert, yet, but i use trunk. now, for production
> purposes i still use trunk because before i "svn up" on production i
> make sure that the site runs on my development box on the latest
> trunk.
>
> you do have a development environment, right? ;)
Mohorovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> please post your opinions on using 0.96 or trunk version in production
> environment.
> which would you choose and why?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Gro
On 05-Feb-08, at 7:15 PM, Jarek Zgoda wrote:
> some day it would not be feasible to port any application to "1.0". I
> know personally many people still having their apps running on 0.91
> because of too large amount of work needed to port to any later
> version.
I ha
On 5 Feb, 14:45, Jarek Zgoda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If anyone can afford running on trunk (as I do with my personal
> projects), then there's no reason to run on 0.96.
I agree: I'm running a very recent version of newforms-admin branch in
my *production* site with no problem at
501 - 600 of 775 matches
Mail list logo