BING! Fred's fix did it. Notice in the package lists above I had
"Django-0.95-py2.4.egg"? There was also a symlink for django in there.
I removed the .egg, reloaded the server and all was well. Thanks
everyone!
On Jan 23, 2:48 pm, "Fred" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are you sure you don't have
Are you sure you don't have both a Django python egg and a django dir
in site-packages when you'r installing from source/SVN? I had similar
problems, removed the first installed egg (I think it was installed
using setuptools) and re-installed from source.
Fred.
python2.4 manage.py runserver)
> what version does it report? You may need to edit your django.egg file
> to point to the new django root.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users
When you start your development server (python2.4 manage.py runserver)
what version does it report? You may need to edit your django.egg file
to point to the new django root.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed
This is what I get:
-
>>> pprint.pprint(sys.path)
['',
'/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/setuptools-0.6c1-py2.4.egg',
'/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/Django-0.95-py2.4.egg',
'/usr/lib/python24.zip',
'/usr/lib/python2.4',
'/usr/lib/python2.4/plat-linux2',
here's something to check you paths.
Run python interactively:
import sys
import pprint
pprint.pprint(sys.path)
The results will be something like:
>>> import sys
>>> import pprint
>>> pprint.pprint(sys.path)
['',
'C:\\Python24\\lib\\site-packages\\pyrrd-0.0.1-py2.4.egg',
I just tried removing the 'django_src/django' directory, followed by an
update and am still not seeing the new stuff. :-(
On Jan 23, 1:35 pm, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've had similar problems with .pyc files not getting cleaned out, etc.
> The easiest way to fix this is
I've had similar problems with .pyc files not getting cleaned out, etc.
The easiest way to fix this is to just delete the entire repository
and check it out again.
--Simon
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
d in the line for testing newforms it bombed out on me.
>
> This is the line atop my view:
> from django import newforms as forms
>
> That was copied straight from the docs and yet my installed version is
> telling me it doesn't know what I'm talking about.
>
> Django
testing newforms it bombed out on me.
>
> > This is the line atop my view:
> > from django import newforms as forms
>
> > That was copied straight from the docs and yet my installed version is
> > telling me it doesn't know what I'm talking about.
>
> > Django is i
straight from the docs and yet my installed version is
telling me it doesn't know what I'm talking about.
Django is installed in /usr/local/django_src, and I ran the setup.py
install utility just now but there was no change.
Any ideas?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received
I've just installed 0.95 with deps and then removed django folders from
site-packages and symlinked SVN version from my home folder :)
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django
users" grou
Thanks mate, I'll try it out !
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django
users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
Hi,
Is anyone here using the django development version on Gentoo ?
I'd like to upgrade to it .. I try to avoid installing packages in any
way other than through portage... so I'm looking for some sort of
gentoo ebuild that will install Django from a .tar.gz file (as I will
have to download
"A.Ali" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi,
Is anyone here using the django development version on Gentoo ?
I'd like to upgrade to it .. I try to avoid installing packages in any
way other than through portage... so I'm looking for some sort of
gentoo ebuild that will ins
On 1/9/07, Chris Brand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Presumably I can also use that in a template :
> {% object.get_kind_display %}
Yup.
--
"May the forces of evil become confused on the way to your house."
-- George Carlin
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received
> Each instance of your model will have a special method name
> 'get_foo_display', where 'foo' is the name of the field with the
> choices. For example:
I should have found that. Thanks.
> >>> b.get_kind_display()
Presumably I can also use that in a template :
{% object.get_kind_display %}
On 1/9/07, Chris Brand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In the admin, it displays the current value nicely (the second column), but
> on my page, it displays the actual value from the database (the first
> column) instead. I'd like to display the value used by the admin form, but
> can't figure where
I have model with field with choices set, similar to that in the
documentation at
http://www.djangoproject.com/documentation/model_api/#choices
In the admin, it displays the current value nicely (the second column), but
on my page, it displays the actual value from the database (the first
column)
Thanks Istvan,
You guessed right I am on windows.
I changed the script, ran it, installed django and navigated to the
built in admin site where I was greeted by the nice clean looking admin
interface that I am used to seeing.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received
Paul Childs wrote:
> I'm pretty sure that the download script that I found here...
> http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/1327
> must not be doing the job properly.
if you are using windows you'll need to change line 41 to:
fp = open(basedir + link, 'wb+')
i.
I'm pretty sure that the download script that I found here...
http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/1327
must not be doing the job properly.
I took the media from the admin in the 0.95 release and replaced the
dev version's media and that fixed a good chunk of it.
I'll have to do a SVN
Adrian Holovaty wrote:
> I have never seen anything like that. I suspect the images are
> corrupted somehow, and I have no idea how that might have happened.
One common cause is opening files in text mode under windows. The flags
need to be 'wb' not just 'w'
i.
On 12/7/06, Paul Childs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, I tried again and installed everything from scratch - new
> project, app, database. I went through the first two sections of the
> tutorial and I still got the same problem. I have posted this image of
> the problem which shows how the
On 12/7/06, Paul Childs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think this is a serious problem, should this be posted on the
> developer group or a ticket raised?
The images and CSS in the admin haven't changed, so I'm wondering if
this is an issue with your browser or with a corrupt download maybe...
Well, I tried again and installed everything from scratch - new
project, app, database. I went through the first two sections of the
tutorial and I still got the same problem. I have posted this image of
the problem which shows how the admin looks through Firefox...
The firewall has the SVN port closed off so when I noticed this ticket
http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/1327
I was encouraged to go and get a development version of Django. I
scooped the script and ran it and lo and behold I had Revision 4179 of
the 96-pre version of Django! I uninstalled my
Form handling/manipulators will change before 1.0 so also current
SVN/0.95 will need some upgrade. For a new project use SVN
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users" group.
To post to this
I have already 3 projects in 0.91 version. Now I am going to start
another project that will be similar to one of those 3 already running
projects.
Shall I use
- 0.95 version,
- the latest svn version,
-wait for 1.0 version( that I expect it to be downward compatible)
- use 0.91 version because
On 08-Sep-06, at 11:34 AM, Adrian Holovaty wrote:
> We're making this announcement in case some people are
> using the development version on a production site somewhere.
thanks for the prompt work - afaik most production sites are running
on the development version
--
regards
k
Hello all,
Thanks to a report 30 minutes ago from Robert Bunting, we've fixed a
hole in the Django admin site that allows non-authenticated users to
create unprivileged user accounts by guessing a URL.
This affects people using the Django development version, revision
3520 or higher. It does
I've found it easy enough to use TortoiseSVN to create patches.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com
To
SVN doesn't (I believe) offer the ability to apply outside patches.
Instead, you'll have to do what we do in the Unix world, use the
"patch" program.
You can find a Windows version of it here:
http://gnuwin32.sourceforge.net/packages/patch.htm
This program takes the patch file a
thanks, benj. I will update as soon as possible - still trying to
install the svn-repository ...
Am 23.07.2006 um 03:36 schrieb benj:
>
> Patrick,
> Thanks for this great extension!
> One snag I hit is that your code assumes we serve our admin media from
> /media/, which I happen not to. I
Patrick,
Thanks for this great extension!
One snag I hit is that your code assumes we serve our admin media from
/media/, which I happen not to. I just ran ''' sed -i -e
"s:/media/:/admin-media/:g" *html ''' in the templates dir, but this
setting is already available in
as mentioned before, I´m currently getting help from my hosting-
provider.
trac is already set up on our server - of course, help is still
appreciated.
Am 12.07.2006 um 16:42 schrieb favo:
>
> could anyone can help va:patrick.kranzlmueller to setup a open svn
> trunk even with a trac
could anyone can help va:patrick.kranzlmueller to setup a open svn
trunk even with a trac system?
It's very hard to communicte with feedback - upload - feedback...
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
schrieb Phil Powell:
>
> >
> > Thanks for the update Patrick. I've got this part working, but having
> > trouble with makethumb on existing files on the server - not had time
> > to delve too deeply yet to see what the problem is though.
> >
> > -Phil
e too deeply yet to see what the problem is though.
>
> -Phil
>
> On 11/07/06, va:patrick.kranzlmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>>
>> a new version of the filebrowser is available for download.
>>
>> CHANGES:
>> 001: You may define an
Thanks for the update Patrick. I've got this part working, but having
trouble with makethumb on existing files on the server - not had time
to delve too deeply yet to see what the problem is though.
-Phil
On 11/07/06, va:patrick.kranzlmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> a
a new version of the filebrowser is available for download.
CHANGES:
001: You may define an initial directory for each FileBrowseField by
adding a path to the help_text: Like "FileBrowser: /images/blog/" or
"FileBrowser: /documents/pdf/".
002: Sorting algorithm also works
thanks.
I will take a look at the bugs mentioned by archatas - so there'll
probably be a new version for download later today.
SVN: I´ve never worked with SVN (well, besides using django), no idea
how to do the setup. It´d be very useful but I don´t have the time to
digg into that right
This is fantastic stuff! I'll be taking a look at testing it out and
possibly implementing for a current project (thousands of image files
to manage).
Any plans for a SVN address?
-Phil
On 08/07/06, patrickk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> today we´ve finished the test version o
the uploaded images are being
accessed with additional slash at the end of the URL.
That were my notices. But on the whole, great work!
Aidas Bendoraitis [aka Archatas]
patrickk wrote:
> today we´ve finished the test version of our django filebrowser.
>
> some screenshots are her
It's very cool, open svn address is better:-)
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group,
, patrickk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> today we´ve finished the test version of our django filebrowser.
>
> some screenshots are here:
> http://www.vonautomatisch.at/django/filebrowser/
>
> you can download the filebrowser here:
> http://www.vonautomatisch.at/djan
today we´ve finished the test version of our django filebrowser.
some screenshots are here:
http://www.vonautomatisch.at/django/filebrowser/
you can download the filebrowser here:
http://www.vonautomatisch.at/django/filebrowser/FileBrowser.zip
installation shouldn´t take more than 5-10 minutes
Good work.
Sia
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL
http://jtauber.com/blog/2006/05/23/primitive_python_version_of_gwt_working
Someone posted this to our site: James Tauber has built "a Python
equivalent to the Google Web Toolkit (GWT)" -
http://code.google.com/webtoolkit
It's interesting :)
Several days? several weeks? several months? or several years?
If too far,I will use 0.91 version.
--
http://www.flyaflya.com powered by pygame+python
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django
On Tue, Mar 28, 2006 at 11:11:58AM -0600, Adrian Holovaty wrote:
> Alternatively (or maybe additionally), we could have a separate
> downloadable tarball of all the docs in HTML format, with all the CSS
> and images. I would prefer not to include all of that in the main
> Django distribution,
> > I maintain that all of the online docs need to be in the tar file...
>
> It would be nice and clean to take the code that converts the ReST
> docs into HTML, and the unit tests into HTML, and bundle that with
> Django along with a simple view that displays it, converting the docs
> on the fly
On 3/28/06, Glenn Tenney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are these examples helpful? Certainly, but...
>
> (a) they need to be in a different and much more obvious location... oh,
> in the docs directory would be a start.
>
> (b) they are not the complete text of what's online and the parts
On 3/24/06, Glenn Tenney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 07:45:18PM -0600, James Bennett wrote:
> > Every time you download Django, you get a complete copy of the latest
> > version of the documentation, in ASCII format.
>
> As I've noted on one
Is there an ASCII or PDF version of the documentation?
Specially installation, tutorial and overview.
Tried to print them, but any line that is long, gets cutoff when printing
from my FreeBSD desktop at work..
Will try a windows machine at home.. but it would be nice if the
documentation
Thanks,
I may look at accessing the cursor directory for TP stuff.
S
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com
To
Yes all it says is pending.
Have you checked:
http://code.djangoproject.com/wiki/VersionOneFeatures
Hi
I have looked all over the roadmap etc.. and cant find any dates on the
features.
The most important feature for me is the transaction support in the ORM
layer.
Does anyone have any ideas on the progress or timeline for this ?
Thanks,
i should have known the subversion better.
thank you and berto a lot for quick replies.
On 2/8/06, Hwan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
hi,which svn revision matches the released django-0.91?where can i find this kind of information?thanksRelease 0.91 was revision 1908 of the trunk. Django follows normal SVN conventions for release tagging, so you can get this information by looking at
hi,
which svn revision matches the released django-0.91?
where can i find this kind of information?
thanks
On 21 Nov 2005, at 20:26, Maniac wrote:
It's also common thing to extract password change in a separate view.
Yeah, that's blatantly a much better idea :-)
Afternoon, man about the Internet -- http://aftnn.org/
Afternoon wrote:
One idiom which is common is to intepret an empty password field to
mean "no change to password".
On a similar note...
It's also common thing to extract password change in a separate view. I
beleive it complies more with user interaction model because changing
some
On 11/21/05, James Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Entering the hash directly would have to be disallowed, making for
> another backwards-incompatible change, but I can't think of any reason
> why it'd be useful to keep that ability.
>
I can think of a reason: as a sysadmin, I have
On 21 Nov 2005, at 15:41, Adrian Holovaty wrote:
If we assume it's always plaintext, that would mean you'd have to
enter the password for an individual user each time you changed that
user.
Adrian
Why out of interest?
One idiom which is common is to intepret an empty password field to
On 11/21/05, Afternoon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > There'd be no way of knowing whether the incoming password were
> > plaintext vs. encrypted, because any character is allowed in a
> > password.
>
> I would assume it's always plaintext. I've never seen anything where
> you have to encrypt the
Le Lundi 21 Novembre 2005 16:34, Afternoon a écrit :
> On 21 Nov 2005, at 15:26, Adrian Holovaty wrote:
> > There'd be no way of knowing whether the incoming password were
> > plaintext vs. encrypted, because any character is allowed in a
> > password.
>
> I would assume it's always plaintext.
On 21 Nov 2005, at 15:26, Adrian Holovaty wrote:
There'd be no way of knowing whether the incoming password were
plaintext vs. encrypted, because any character is allowed in a
password.
I would assume it's always plaintext. I've never seen anything where
you have to encrypt the password
On 11/21/05, Adrian Holovaty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There'd be no way of knowing whether the incoming password were
> plaintext vs. encrypted, because any character is allowed in a
> password.
I guess I could have phrased that better. Currently admin interface
directs the user to enter the
On 21 Nov 2005, at 14:44, James Bennett wrote:
On 11/21/05, Adrian Holovaty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
No, the admin interface for users currently doesn't encrypt
passwords.
There's a longstanding ticket for this. Ideally there'd be a "Create
password" link that would create it on the
On 11/21/05, Adrian Holovaty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No, the admin interface for users currently doesn't encrypt passwords.
> There's a longstanding ticket for this. Ideally there'd be a "Create
> password" link that would create it on the server side via
> XMLHttpRequest and populate the
On 11/21/05, Afternoon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can the admin encrypt passwords for you?
No, the admin interface for users currently doesn't encrypt passwords.
There's a longstanding ticket for this. Ideally there'd be a "Create
password" link that would create it on the server side via
On 21 Nov 2005, at 3:37, Adrian Holovaty wrote:
We've added extra security to the stored passwords in Django's
authentication system. Thanks to a patch from GomoX, passwords are now
stored with a salt and use SHA-1 encryption instead of MD5.
Can the admin encrypt passwords for you?
Caveat
f the authentication docs for full information:
http://www.djangoproject.com/documentation/authentication/#passwords
Finally, note that this change applies only to the Django development
version. If you're using Django 0.90, you won't see this change until
the next release.
Adrian
--
Adrian H
701 - 775 of 775 matches
Mail list logo
