> As documented in the backwards-incompatibility notes from the
> queryset-refactor merge, OneToOneFields in (existing) admin are not
> supported. They didn't work before the qsrf merge reliably, either, so
> no functionality was lost in the process.
Sweet, I'm switching to nf-ad. Thanks a lot.
On Wed, 2008-07-16 at 22:35 +0800, Eric Abrahamsen wrote:
> > Saving how, exactly? If admin, newforms-admin or old admin? If old
> > admin, have you tried it on newforms-admin -- bugs in old admin are
> > unlikely to get any attention at this point. If saving in your own
> > code, more d
> Saving how, exactly? If admin, newforms-admin or old admin? If old
> admin, have you tried it on newforms-admin -- bugs in old admin are
> unlikely to get any attention at this point. If saving in your own
> code, more details of that code would help.
>
This is saving through the old a
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 2:49 AM, Eric Abrahamsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've got an issue with multiple one-to-one relationships, which
> probably arises from poor design decisions on my part. Given a model
> like the following:
>
> class Translator
I've got an issue with multiple one-to-one relationships, which
probably arises from poor design decisions on my part. Given a model
like the following:
class Translator(models.Model):
user = models.OneToOneField(User, unique=True, blank=True,
null=True, help_text="If this
ECTED]> wrote:
> Hello
>
> Is it possible to have multiple one-to-one relationships for a single
> class or is there a better way to do it.
>
> What I have is an event which has about 12 fields. Optionally any
> combination of a single weather record, a single event detail rec
Malcolm Tredinnick skrev:
> On Tue, 2007-08-21 at 21:21 -0700, Catriona wrote:
>
>> What I have is an event which has about 12 fields. Optionally any
>> combination of a single weather record, a single event detail record,
>> a single survey record and one of four event subclass records may be
Catriona
On Aug 22, 2:42 pm, Malcolm Tredinnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-08-21 at 21:21 -0700, Catriona wrote:
> > Hello
>
> > Is it possible to have multiple one-to-one relationships for a single
> > class or is there a better way to do it.
>
>
On Tue, 2007-08-21 at 21:21 -0700, Catriona wrote:
> Hello
>
> Is it possible to have multiple one-to-one relationships for a single
> class or is there a better way to do it.
Not at the moment, no. OneToOneFields assume they are going to be the
primary key, so you're restricte
Hello
Is it possible to have multiple one-to-one relationships for a single
class or is there a better way to do it.
What I have is an event which has about 12 fields. Optionally any
combination of a single weather record, a single event detail record,
a single survey record and one of four
10 matches
Mail list logo
