Re: Alternative to celery

2017-05-11 Thread marcin . j . nowak
RQ is simple, stable and reliable. Redis is also a persistent storage, but you should read about this and use the best solution for your case: https://redis.io/topics/persistence You may also consider deploying a fault-tolerant Redis cluster (min. 3 nodes AFAIR) RQ has different

Re: Alternative to celery

2017-04-20 Thread Avraham Serour
try googling 'python task queue' see https://www.fullstackpython.com/task-queues.html On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 12:25 PM, Andréas Kühne wrote: > I don't know anything about the python-rq stuff - however redis can be > configured to save to disk (see

Re: Alternative to celery

2017-04-20 Thread Andréas Kühne
I don't know anything about the python-rq stuff - however redis can be configured to save to disk (see https://redis.io/topics/persistence) - so you wouldn't loose anything on a power-failure (if configured correctly). Redis is so much more than a cache nowadays. Regards, Andréas 2017-04-20

Alternative to celery

2017-04-20 Thread guettli
Some years ago I used celery for a project. Today I face roughly the same use case again. The last time I used it, celery felt to heavy weighted, too complicated. I found this alternative: http://python-rq.org/ There are two things which speak agains python-rq: - redis is a cache. I need a