Re: [dm-devel] dm-devel Digest, Vol 146, Issue 24

2016-04-26 Thread Oliver Mangold
On 25.04.2016 18:00, dm-devel-requ...@redhat.com wrote: > Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 09:49:50 +0200 From: Hannes Reinecke > To: dm-devel@redhat.com Subject: Re: [dm-devel] Upcall > prioritizer for multipath Message-ID: <571dcc1e.5000...@suse.de> > Content-Type: text/plain;

Re: [dm-devel] multipath-0.5.0 still provides broken udev rules

2016-04-26 Thread Zdenek Kabelac
On 26.4.2016 10:47, Hannes Reinecke wrote: On 04/26/2016 10:39 AM, Zdenek Kabelac wrote: On 26.4.2016 07:43, Hannes Reinecke wrote: On 04/25/2016 07:38 PM, Benjamin Marzinski wrote: On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 02:56:35PM +0200, Christophe Varoqui wrote: Hi, Those example udev rules are

Re: [dm-devel] multipath-0.5.0 still provides broken udev rules

2016-04-26 Thread Hannes Reinecke
On 04/26/2016 10:39 AM, Zdenek Kabelac wrote: > On 26.4.2016 07:43, Hannes Reinecke wrote: >> On 04/25/2016 07:38 PM, Benjamin Marzinski wrote: >>> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 02:56:35PM +0200, Christophe Varoqui wrote: Hi, Those example udev rules are indeed unmaintained and should

Re: [dm-devel] multipath-0.5.0 still provides broken udev rules

2016-04-26 Thread Zdenek Kabelac
On 26.4.2016 07:43, Hannes Reinecke wrote: On 04/25/2016 07:38 PM, Benjamin Marzinski wrote: On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 02:56:35PM +0200, Christophe Varoqui wrote: Hi, Those example udev rules are indeed unmaintained and should be removed not to confuse distributors. Distributors

Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH v3 14/21] fs: Allow superblock owner to change ownership of inodes with unmappable ids

2016-04-26 Thread Serge E. Hallyn
Quoting Seth Forshee (seth.fors...@canonical.com): > In a userns mount some on-disk inodes may have ids which do not > map into s_user_ns, in which case the in-kernel inodes are owned > by invalid users. The superblock owner should be able to change > attributes of these inodes but cannot. However

Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH v3 03/21] fs: Allow sysfs and cgroupfs to share super blocks between user namespaces

2016-04-26 Thread Serge E. Hallyn
Quoting Seth Forshee (seth.fors...@canonical.com): > Both of these filesystems already have use cases for mounting the > same super block from multiple user namespaces. For sysfs this > happens when using criu for snapshotting a container, where sysfs > is mounted in the containers network ns but