Xose Vazquez Perez (2):
multipath-tools: Replace -fstack-protector with -fstack-protector-strong
multipath-tools: Add -Werror compilation flags
Makefile.inc | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Cc: Christophe Varoqui
Cc: device-mapper
Add -Werror=format-security: GCC will refuse to compile code that could be
vulnerable to a string format security flaw. At present, this warns about
calls to "printf" and "scanf" from untrusted input and contains %n.
Add -Werror=implicit-function-declaration: Implicit function declarations
allows
-fstack-protector-strong
Like -fstack-protector but includes additional functions to be protected
--- those that have local array definitions, or have references to local
frame addresses.
gcc-4.9.0(April 22, 2014) required.
This flag is used by default in Fedora:
On 12/05/2016 03:40 PM, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 10:07 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>
>> On 12/05/2016 06:05 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>> On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 08:15:15PM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
No functional changes with this patch, it's just in
Algorithms not compatible with mcryptd could be spawned by mcryptd
with a direct crypto_alloc_tfm invocation using a "mcryptd(alg)" name
construct. This causes mcryptd to crash the kernel if an arbitrary
"alg" is incompatible and not intended to be used with mcryptd. It is
an issue if AF_ALG
On Mon, 2016-12-05 at 20:34 +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 04:15:21PM -0800, Tim Chen wrote:
> >
> > Algorithms not compatible with mcryptd could be spawned by mcryptd
> > with a direct crypto_alloc_tfm invocation using a "mcryptd(alg)"
> > name construct. This causes mcryptd
On Mon, 2016-12-05 at 08:50 -0800, Tim Chen wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-12-05 at 20:34 +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 04:15:21PM -0800, Tim Chen wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Algorithms not compatible with mcryptd could be spawned by mcryptd
> > > with a direct crypto_alloc_tfm
On 11/26/2016 11:26 PM, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
> Is there anything else missing or leftover?
Please, drop this patch. Thank you.
> $ git grep "(CC)"
> Makefile.inc: $(CC) $(CFLAGS) -c -o $@ $<
> kpartx/Makefile:$(CC) $(CFLAGS) $(OBJS) -o $(EXEC) $(LDFLAGS)
> $(LIBDEPS)
>
On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 10:07 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
>
> On 12/05/2016 06:05 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 08:15:15PM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> >> No functional changes with this patch, it's just in preparation for
> >> supporting legacy schedulers on
On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 04:15:21PM -0800, Tim Chen wrote:
> Algorithms not compatible with mcryptd could be spawned by mcryptd
> with a direct crypto_alloc_tfm invocation using a "mcryptd(alg)"
> name construct. This causes mcryptd to crash the kernel if
> "alg" is incompatible and not intended
Dne 5.12.2016 v 07:29 muneendra kumar napsal(a):
Hi,
This is a general question.
If i do any changes in both multipath tool and dm driver (kernel).
How do i push my changes into main stream.
Can someone explain me the process so that it will help me a lot.
Hi
You propose your changes here
ack
On Sun, Dec 04, 2016 at 11:26:38PM -0600, Benjamin Marzinski wrote:
> If no block was allocated or freed, sm_ll_mutate() wasn't setting
> *ev, leaving the variable unitialized. sm_ll_insert(),
> sm_disk_inc_block(), and sm_disk_new_block() all check ev to see
> if there was an allocation
So, I ended up with the following setup:
* Modified /etc/init.d/lvm2 to explicitly deactivate logical volumes:
/lvm lvchange -a n --select name=~.*/
o Createlvm2-clean-shutdown /if deactivation is successful.//
* Turn off automatic LV activation by
Hi,
This is a general question.
If i do any changes in both multipath tool and dm driver (kernel).
How do i push my changes into main stream.
Can someone explain me the process so that it will help me a lot.
Regards,
Muneendra.
--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@redhat.com
Algorithms not compatible with mcryptd could be spawned by mcryptd
with a direct crypto_alloc_tfm invocation using a "mcryptd(alg)"
name construct. This causes mcryptd to crash the kernel if
"alg" is incompatible and not intended to be used with mcryptd.
A flag CRYPTO_ALG_MCRYPT is being added
On Thu, 2016-12-01 at 23:06 -0800, Eric Biggers wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 05:47:02PM -0800, Tim Chen wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 2016-12-01 at 19:00 -0500, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > There is a bug in mcryptd initialization.
> > >
> > > This is a test module that tries
16 matches
Mail list logo