From: "tang.junhui"
Change-Id: I3f81a55fff389f991f915927000b281d7e263cc5
Signed-off-by: tang.junhui
This patch used to improve processing efficiency for addition and deletion
of multipath devices.
This patch is tested pass by ZTE multipath
On 02/15/17 18:53, Mike Snitzer wrote:
Nobody has interest in Linux multipathing becoming fragmented.
If every transport implemented their own multipathing the end-user would
be amazingly screwed trying to keep track of all the
quirks/configuration/management of each.
Not saying
On Wed, Feb 15 2017 at 9:56am -0500,
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 04:19:13PM -0500, Keith Busch wrote:
> > These devices are mulitpath capable, and have been able to stack with
> > dm-mpath since kernel 4.2.
>
> Can we make this conditional on
On Wed, Feb 15 2017 at 9:01pm -0500,
Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 14 2017 at 6:00pm -0500,
> Keith Busch wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 01:35:45PM -0800, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > > On 02/14/2017 01:19 PM, Keith Busch wrote:
> > > >
On Tue, Feb 14 2017 at 6:00pm -0500,
Keith Busch wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 01:35:45PM -0800, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > On 02/14/2017 01:19 PM, Keith Busch wrote:
> > > These devices are mulitpath capable, and have been able to stack with
> > > dm-mpath since
On Wed, Feb 15 2017 at 12:24pm -0500,
Keith Busch wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 06:57:21AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 06:00:23PM -0500, Keith Busch wrote:
> > > Good point. I was unknowingly running with CONFIG_SCSI_DH disabled,
> > >
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 03:38:33PM +0800, tang.jun...@zte.com.cn wrote:
> From: "tang.junhui"
>
> Change-Id: I3f81a55fff389f991f915927000b281d7e263cc5
> Signed-off-by: tang.junhui
>
> This patch used to improve processing efficiency for addition
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 06:57:21AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 06:00:23PM -0500, Keith Busch wrote:
> > Good point. I was unknowingly running with CONFIG_SCSI_DH disabled,
> > and blissfully unaware of its existence! After enabling that option,
> > I see what you
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 06:00:23PM -0500, Keith Busch wrote:
> Good point. I was unknowingly running with CONFIG_SCSI_DH disabled,
> and blissfully unaware of its existence! After enabling that option,
> I see what you mean.
Someone needs to fix that crash ASAP. I though Hannes had patches for