On Sat, 20 May 2017, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Fri 19-05-17 19:50:24, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 18 May 2017, Junaid Shahid wrote:
> >
> > > d224e9381897 (drivers/md/dm-ioctl.c: use kvmalloc rather than opencoded
> > > variant) left out the __GFP_HIGH flag when converting from
Use the kvmalloc function instead of dm_integrity_kvmalloc.
Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka
---
drivers/md/dm-integrity.c | 27 ++-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6/drivers/md/dm-integrity.c
Cc: Christophe Varoqui
Cc: device-mapper development
Signed-off-by: Xose Vazquez Perez
---
libmultipath/hwtable.c | 10 +-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/libmultipath/hwtable.c
Thanks for the clarification.
On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 11:17 AM, Zouming (IT)
wrote:
> Hi christophe:
>
> We absolutely sure for product XSG1,no arrays use vendor name HUASY.
> Because these arrays are our up-to-date product.
>
> Best regards,
> Zou Ming.
>
> On
Hi,
question is, is there arrays in the wild exposing this vendor name ?
If so, we'll rather keep its defaults for the decade to come.
Best regards,
Christophe.
On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 10:27 AM, Zou Ming
wrote:
> For product XSG1,HUASY is obsolete for Huawei
For product XSG1,HUASY is obsolete for Huawei devices,Only HUAWEI is the
official vendor name.
---
libmultipath/hwtable.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/libmultipath/hwtable.c b/libmultipath/hwtable.c
index 54309ef..bd8719c 100644
--- a/libmultipath/hwtable.c