On Mon, 27 Nov 2017, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 8:01 PM, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, 24 Nov 2017, Dan Williams wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 6:36 PM, Mikulas Patocka
> > > wrote:
> > > > Hi
> > > >
> >
On 2017/12/4 23:11, Martin Wilck wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-12-04 at 22:23 +0800, Guan Junxiong wrote:
>>> An open question is what multipathd should do wrt path grouping if
>>> it
>>> only has preliminary prio values, in particular with group_by_prio.
>> For the open question, in this situation, IMO
From: Jie Yang
Assign sg_id.channel to controller id of the NVMe/NVMf target
and assign sg_id.lun to namespace ID of the target.
Signed-off-by: Jie Yang
Reviewed-by: Guan Junxiong
---
change since V1:
patch 2/2 --> path
Hi Martin,
Sorry for the late reply. I have recovered from a busy week.
Please find my comments below.
On 2017/11/23 10:10, Martin wrote:
> Hi Guan,
>
> while staring at this code the other day, I realized another possible
> issue with your latency prioritizer.
>
> It will cause significant
In the hot-plug storage OS, if we tear down the target storage,
there is a race between the path removing from the path list and
handling the path-failed udev event. Therefore, we need to check
null path before handle path-failed event.
Signed-off-by: Guan Junxiong
---