On Sat, Aug 14, 2021 at 2:34 PM Michael Weiß
wrote:
>
> To be able to send auditing events to user space, we introduce
> a generic dm-audit module. It provides helper functions to emit
> audit events through the kernel audit subsystem. We claim the
> AUDIT_DM type=1336 out of the audit event messa
> Native copy offload is not supported for stacked devices.
One of the main reasons that the historic attempts at supporting copy
offload did not get merged was that the ubiquitous deployment scenario,
stacked block devices, was not handled well.
Pitfalls surrounding stacking has been brought u
On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 12:52 AM ruansy.f...@fujitsu.com
wrote:
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Jane Chu
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v6 1/9] pagemap: Introduce ->memory_failure()
> >
> >
> > On 8/17/2021 10:43 PM, Jane Chu wrote:
> > > More information -
> > >
> > > On 8/16/2021
On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 09:07:54PM +0530, Nitesh Shetty wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 5:06 AM Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 03:44:20PM +0530, SelvaKumar S wrote:
> > > From: Nitesh Shetty
> > >
> > > Add new BLKCOPY ioctl that offloads copying of one or more sources ra
On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 11:08:40PM -0700, Jane Chu wrote:
>
> On 8/17/2021 10:43 PM, Jane Chu wrote:
> > More information -
> >
> > On 8/16/2021 10:20 AM, Jane Chu wrote:
> > > Hi, ShiYang,
> > >
> > > So I applied the v6 patch series to my 5.14-rc3 as it's what you
> > > indicated is what v6 wa
On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 6:40 PM Greg KH wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 03:44:20PM +0530, SelvaKumar S wrote:
> > From: Nitesh Shetty
> >
> > Add new BLKCOPY ioctl that offloads copying of one or more sources ranges
> > to a destination in the device. COPY ioctl accepts a 'copy_range'
> > stru
On 8/17/2021 10:43 PM, Jane Chu wrote:
More information -
On 8/16/2021 10:20 AM, Jane Chu wrote:
Hi, ShiYang,
So I applied the v6 patch series to my 5.14-rc3 as it's what you
indicated is what v6 was based at, and injected a hardware poison.
I'm seeing the same problem that was reported a
More information -
On 8/16/2021 10:20 AM, Jane Chu wrote:
Hi, ShiYang,
So I applied the v6 patch series to my 5.14-rc3 as it's what you
indicated is what v6 was based at, and injected a hardware poison.
I'm seeing the same problem that was reported a while ago after the
poison was consumed -
On 2021-08-17 4:41 p.m., Mikulas Patocka wrote:
On Tue, 17 Aug 2021, Bart Van Assche wrote:
On 8/17/21 3:14 AM, SelvaKumar S wrote:
Introduce REQ_OP_COPY, a no-merge copy offload operation. Create
bio with control information as payload and submit to the device.
Larger copy operation may be
On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 6:38 PM Greg KH wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 03:44:18PM +0530, SelvaKumar S wrote:
> > From: Nitesh Shetty
> >
> > Add device limits as sysfs entries,
> > - copy_offload (READ_WRITE)
> > - max_copy_sectors (READ_ONLY)
> > - max_copy_ranges_sec
> -Original Message-
> From: Jane Chu
> Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v6 1/9] pagemap: Introduce ->memory_failure()
>
>
> On 8/17/2021 10:43 PM, Jane Chu wrote:
> > More information -
> >
> > On 8/16/2021 10:20 AM, Jane Chu wrote:
> >> Hi, ShiYang,
> >>
> >> So I applied the v6 patch seri
11 matches
Mail list logo
