On Fri, Jun 02, 2023 at 11:44:27AM -0700, Sarthak Kukreti wrote:
> On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 8:28 AM Mike Snitzer wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, May 30 2023 at 10:55P -0400,
> > Joe Thornber wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 3:02 PM Mike Snitzer wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Also Joe, for you
On Fri, Jun 02 2023 at 2:44P -0400,
Sarthak Kukreti wrote:
> On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 8:28 AM Mike Snitzer wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, May 30 2023 at 10:55P -0400,
> > Joe Thornber wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 3:02 PM Mike Snitzer wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Also Joe, for you proposed
On Thu, Jun 01, 2023 at 03:24:39PM +0800, Coiby Xu wrote:
> [PATCH 0/5] Support kdump with LUKS encryption by reusing LUKS volume key
The kernel has no concept of LUKS at all. It provides dm-crypt, which LUKS
happens to use. But LUKS is a userspace concept.
This is a kernel patchset, so why
On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 8:28 AM Mike Snitzer wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 30 2023 at 10:55P -0400,
> Joe Thornber wrote:
>
> > On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 3:02 PM Mike Snitzer wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Also Joe, for you proposed dm-thinp design where you distinquish
> > > between "provision" and "reserve":
On Thu, 2023-06-01 at 13:17 -0500, Benjamin Marzinski wrote:
> On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 03:44:58PM +, Martin Wilck wrote:
> > On Fri, 2023-05-19 at 18:02 -0500, Benjamin Marzinski wrote:
> > > This allows configuations to use "group_by_tpg" if alua is
> > > autodetected
> > > and another policy
On Fri, Jun 2, 2023 at 11:41 AM Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> Except the whole make a thing readonly just for fun is the corner case.
> DM does it, and we have a sysfs file to allow it. But the usual
> case is that a block device has been read-only all the time, or has
> been force to be
[quoting your reply out of order, because I think it makes sense that
way]
On Thu, Jun 01, 2023 at 09:02:25PM -0400, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> So honestly, that whole test for
>
> + if (op_is_write(bio_op(bio)) && bio_sectors(bio) &&
> + bdev_read_only(bdev)) {
>
> may look
On Thu, 2023-06-01 at 12:51 -0500, Benjamin Marzinski wrote:
> On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 03:30:02PM +, Martin Wilck wrote:
> > On Fri, 2023-05-19 at 18:02 -0500, Benjamin Marzinski wrote:
> > > Signed-off-by: Benjamin Marzinski
> >
> > I wonder if it might make sense for group_by_tpg to mock
