On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 06:24:03PM +, Eric Biggers wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 03, 2022 at 08:25:56AM -0700, Keith Busch wrote:
> > From: Keith Busch
> >
> > The 6.0 kernel made some changes to the direct io interface to allow
> > offsets in user addresses. This based on the hardware's capabilities
On Thu, Nov 03, 2022 at 08:25:56AM -0700, Keith Busch wrote:
> From: Keith Busch
>
> The 6.0 kernel made some changes to the direct io interface to allow
> offsets in user addresses. This based on the hardware's capabilities
> reported in the request_queue's dma_alignment attribute.
>
>
On Thu, 3 Nov 2022, Keith Busch wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 03, 2022 at 12:33:19PM -0400, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > The patchset seems OK - but dm-integrity also has a limitation that the
> > bio vectors must be aligned on logical block size.
> >
> > dm-writecache and dm-verity seem to
From: Keith Busch
The 6.0 kernel made some changes to the direct io interface to allow
offsets in user addresses. This based on the hardware's capabilities
reported in the request_queue's dma_alignment attribute.
dm-crypt requires direct io be aligned to the block size. Since it was
only ever
On Thu, 3 Nov 2022 08:25:56 -0700
Keith Busch wrote:
> From: Keith Busch
>
> The 6.0 kernel made some changes to the direct io interface to allow
> offsets in user addresses. This based on the hardware's capabilities
> reported in the request_queue's dma_alignment attribute.
>
> dm-crypt
On Thu, Nov 03, 2022 at 12:33:19PM -0400, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> Hi
>
> The patchset seems OK - but dm-integrity also has a limitation that the
> bio vectors must be aligned on logical block size.
>
> dm-writecache and dm-verity seem to handle unaligned bioset, but you
> should check them
Hi
The patchset seems OK - but dm-integrity also has a limitation that the
bio vectors must be aligned on logical block size.
dm-writecache and dm-verity seem to handle unaligned bioset, but you
should check them anyway.
I'm not sure about dm-log-writes.
Mikulas
On Thu, 3 Nov 2022, Keith
