On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 06:39:46PM +, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> Why have the scsi_release_buffers() and scsi_put_command(cmd) calls been
> moved up? I haven't found an explanation for this change in the patch
> description.
Because they reference the scsi_cmnd, which are now part of the request
On Wed, 2017-01-25 at 18:25 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> -unsigned char *scsi_alloc_sense_buffer(struct Scsi_Host *shost, gfp_t
> gfp_mask,
> - int numa_node)
> +static unsigned char *scsi_alloc_sense_buffer(struct Scsi_Host *shost,
> + gfp_t gfp_mask, int numa_node)
> {
> "Christoph" == Christoph Hellwig writes:
Christoph> Rely on the new block layer functionality to allocate
Christoph> additional driver specific data behind struct request instead
Christoph> of implementing it in SCSI itѕelf.
Acked-by: Martin K. Petersen
--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle
Rely on the new block layer functionality to allocate additional driver
specific data behind struct request instead of implementing it in SCSI
itѕelf.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke
---
drivers/scsi/hosts.c | 20 +--
drivers/scsi/scsi.c | 319 -
