On Wed, Jan 27 2021 at 10:06pm -0500,
JeffleXu wrote:
>
>
> On 1/28/21 1:19 AM, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 25 2021 at 7:13am -0500,
> > Jeffle Xu wrote:
> >
> >> Since currently we have no simple but efficient way to implement the
> >> bio-based IO polling in the split-bio tracking
On 1/28/21 1:19 AM, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 25 2021 at 7:13am -0500,
> Jeffle Xu wrote:
>
>> Since currently we have no simple but efficient way to implement the
>> bio-based IO polling in the split-bio tracking style, this patch set
>> turns to the original implementation
On Mon, Jan 25 2021 at 7:13am -0500,
Jeffle Xu wrote:
> Since currently we have no simple but efficient way to implement the
> bio-based IO polling in the split-bio tracking style, this patch set
> turns to the original implementation mechanism that iterates and
> polls all underlying hw queues
Since currently we have no simple but efficient way to implement the
bio-based IO polling in the split-bio tracking style, this patch set
turns to the original implementation mechanism that iterates and
polls all underlying hw queues in polling mode. One optimization is
introduced to mitigate the
