On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 01:38:13PM -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 18 2021 at 12:48pm -0400,
> Ming Lei wrote:
>
> > Add one req flag REQ_TAG which will be used in the following patch for
> > supporting bio based IO polling.
>
> "REQ_TAG" is so generic yet is used in such a specific
On 3/19/21 4:48 PM, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 03:59:06PM +0800, JeffleXu wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 3/19/21 12:48 AM, Ming Lei wrote:
>>> Add one req flag REQ_TAG which will be used in the following patch for
>>> supporting bio based IO polling.
>>>
>>> Exactly this flag can help us to
On Thu, Mar 18 2021 at 12:48pm -0400,
Ming Lei wrote:
> Add one req flag REQ_TAG which will be used in the following patch for
> supporting bio based IO polling.
"REQ_TAG" is so generic yet is used in such a specific way (to mark an
FS bio as having polling context)
I don't have a great
On 3/19/21 12:48 AM, Ming Lei wrote:
> Add one req flag REQ_TAG which will be used in the following patch for
> supporting bio based IO polling.
>
> Exactly this flag can help us to do:
>
> 1) request flag is cloned in bio_fast_clone(), so if we mark one FS bio
> as REQ_TAG, all bios cloned
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 03:59:06PM +0800, JeffleXu wrote:
>
>
> On 3/19/21 12:48 AM, Ming Lei wrote:
> > Add one req flag REQ_TAG which will be used in the following patch for
> > supporting bio based IO polling.
> >
> > Exactly this flag can help us to do:
> >
> > 1) request flag is cloned in
Add one req flag REQ_TAG which will be used in the following patch for
supporting bio based IO polling.
Exactly this flag can help us to do:
1) request flag is cloned in bio_fast_clone(), so if we mark one FS bio
as REQ_TAG, all bios cloned from this FS bio will be marked as REQ_TAG.
2)create