[Please don't top-post.. it really compromises the ability to provide
proper context for inlined replies, etc]
On Fri, Aug 03 2018 at 11:13pm -0400,
Drew Hastings wrote:
>Thank you for that insight, I appreciate it.
>Can you elaborate on your concern related to running out of space?
>
>
Thank you for that insight, I appreciate it.
Can you elaborate on your concern related to running out of space?
Assuming the metadata device always has space, is it unsafe to let the the
data device for the thin pool run out of space if queue_if_no_space is set?
Would it not be safe on the block
On Mon, Jul 23 2018 at 10:00am -0400,
Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 23 2018 at 1:06am -0400,
> Drew Hastings wrote:
>
> >I love all of the work you guys do @dm-devel . Thanks for taking the time
> >to read this.
> >I would like to use thin provisioning targets in production,
On Mon, Jul 23 2018 at 1:06am -0400,
Drew Hastings wrote:
>I love all of the work you guys do @dm-devel . Thanks for taking the time
>to read this.
>I would like to use thin provisioning targets in production, but it's hard
>to ignore the warning in the documentation. It seems
I love all of the work you guys do @dm-devel . Thanks for taking the time
to read this.
I would like to use thin provisioning targets in production, but it's hard
to ignore the warning in the documentation. It seems like, with an
understanding of how thin provisioning works, it should be safe to
