Re: [dm-devel] Question about merge performance

2017-03-24 Thread Heinz Mauelshagen
On 03/23/2017 05:35 PM, Michael McCarthy wrote: Hello, collective wisdom, I'm new to the list and apologize if this is not the right place to ask this type of question and if so, would be glad receive pointers to the correct one. Now the question: I'm looking for ways to improve

Re: [dm-devel] Question about merge performance

2017-03-24 Thread Heinz Mauelshagen
On 03/23/2017 05:35 PM, Michael McCarthy wrote: Hello, collective wisdom, I'm new to the list and apologize if this is not the right place to ask this type of question and if so, would be glad receive pointers to the correct one. Now the question: I'm looking for ways to improve

Re: [dm-devel] Question about merge performance

2017-03-24 Thread Zdenek Kabelac
Dne 24.3.2017 v 03:29 Michael McCarthy napsal(a): I appreciate the insight. Are there any plans to enhance the code to allow more parallel execution and/or allow users to experiment with QD? Nope there are no plans to enhance old snapshot target - it would essentially means to write

Re: [dm-devel] Question about merge performance

2017-03-23 Thread Michael McCarthy
I appreciate the insight. Are there any plans to enhance the code to allow more parallel execution and/or allow users to experiment with QD? Thanks, again. Mike On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 7:02 PM, Heinz Mauelshagen wrote: > > > On 03/23/2017 05:35 PM, Michael McCarthy wrote: >

Re: [dm-devel] Question about merge performance

2017-03-23 Thread Heinz Mauelshagen
On 03/23/2017 05:35 PM, Michael McCarthy wrote: Hello, collective wisdom, I'm new to the list and apologize if this is not the right place to ask this type of question and if so, would be glad receive pointers to the correct one. Now the question: I'm looking for ways to improve

[dm-devel] Question about merge performance

2017-03-23 Thread Michael McCarthy
Hello, collective wisdom, I'm new to the list and apologize if this is not the right place to ask this type of question and if so, would be glad receive pointers to the correct one. Now the question: I'm looking for ways to improve snapshot-merge target performance. We're using CentOS 7.3 here.