Re: [dm-devel] linux-next: Tree for Feb 2 (drivers/md/dm.c)

On 02/02/2017 10:44, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > ec8013bedd ("dm: do not forward ioctls from logical volumes to the > underlying device"), > > The trivial fix would be to add a select of the SCSI_REQUEST symbol > to dm, but my gut feeling teels me the call is simply wrong, and > should be

Re: [dm-devel] linux-next: Tree for Feb 2 (drivers/md/dm.c)

On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 01:29:16PM -0500, Mike Snitzer wrote: > Are you trying to say that this happens using a certain .config? > > Also, not sure why you didn't cc Christoph (or Jens) seeing as these > changes are _not_ staged in linux-next by linux-dm.git. No changes to dm caused this, it was

Re: [dm-devel] linux-next: Tree for Feb 2 (drivers/md/dm.c)

On Thu, Feb 02 2017 at 12:58pm -0500, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 02/01/17 23:21, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Changes since 20170201: > > > > on x86_64: > > drivers/built-in.o: In function `dm_blk_ioctl': > dm.c:(.text+0x1a5121): undefined reference to

Re: [dm-devel] linux-next: Tree for Feb 2 (drivers/md/dm.c)

On 02/01/17 23:21, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20170201: > on x86_64: drivers/built-in.o: In function `dm_blk_ioctl': dm.c:(.text+0x1a5121): undefined reference to `scsi_verify_blk_ioctl' # CONFIG_BLK_DEV_BSG is not set # CONFIG_BLK_DEV_BSGLIB is not set -- ~Randy