> On Mar 20, 2023, at 12:41 PM, Benjamin Marzinski wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 03:18:37PM +0100, Martin Wilck wrote:
>> On Thu, 2023-03-16 at 14:47 -0700, Brian Bunker wrote:
>>> As a target vendor, it is nice to be able control initiator
>>> behavior from the target without relying on
From: Martin Wilck
Some generated .d files were not correctly included, and not
removed with "make dep_clean". Fix it.
Reported-by: Xose Vazquez Perez
Signed-off-by: Martin Wilck
---
libmultipath/Makefile | 4 ++--
multipathd/Makefile | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4
On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 03:59:32PM +0900, Yeongjin Gil wrote:
> In verity_end_io(), if bi_status is not BLK_STS_OK, it can be return
> directly. But if FEC configured, it is desired to correct the data page
> through verity_verify_io. And the return value will be converted to
> blk_status and
Unsupported designators, even if they are correct, will result
in parsing errors. Add support for these two:
Logical Unit Group (0x6)
Vendor Specific (0x0)
Mar 20 13:37:35 init107-18 multipath[45016]: parse_vpd_pg83:
invalid device designator at offset 87: 01060004
Mar 20 13:37:35 init107-18
On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 02:53:20PM +, Martin Wilck wrote:
> On Thu, 2023-02-09 at 11:28 -0600, Benjamin Marzinski wrote:
> > Currently, whenever getting the uid_attribute from the udev database
> > fails, multipath will try to get it from the environment variables.
> > This
> > normally isn't
On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 03:18:37PM +0100, Martin Wilck wrote:
> On Thu, 2023-03-16 at 14:47 -0700, Brian Bunker wrote:
> > As a target vendor, it is nice to be able control initiator
> > behavior from the target without relying on user intervention
> > on the initiator. There could be a very large
On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 11:36:12AM -0500, Mike Christie wrote:
> I think we are ok for dasd using BLK_STS_RESV_CONFLICT.
>
> It thought it sounded similar to SCSI/NVMe and userspace will still
> see -EBADE because the blk_status_to_errno/errno_to_blk_status will
> handle this.
>
> There was no
On Wed, 2023-03-15 at 17:01 -0500, Benjamin Marzinski wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 06:02:09PM +0100, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
> > Cc: Martin Wilck
> > Cc: Benjamin Marzinski
> > Cc: Christophe Varoqui
> > Cc: DM-DEVEL ML
> > Signed-off-by: Xose Vazquez Perez
>
> Shouldn't this also go
On Thu, 2023-02-09 at 11:28 -0600, Benjamin Marzinski wrote:
> Currently, whenever getting the uid_attribute from the udev database
> fails, multipath will try to get it from the environment variables.
> This
> normally isn't a problem, since either multipath -u is getting called
> from a uevent
On Thu, 2023-03-16 at 14:47 -0700, Brian Bunker wrote:
> As a target vendor, it is nice to be able control initiator
> behavior from the target without relying on user intervention
> on the initiator. There could be a very large number of initiators
> at a site.
>
> When ACLs are first added for
10 matches
Mail list logo