On 2017/5/25 3:57, Benjamin Marzinski wrote:
> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 10:50:18AM +0800, Yang Feng wrote:
>> Hello Christophe,
> ACK
>
> -Ben
>
Hello Christophe,
Any advance for this patch?
Thanks,Best!
--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@redhat.com
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 01:40:13PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> Commit b685d3d65ac7 "block: treat REQ_FUA and REQ_PREFLUSH as
> synchronous" removed REQ_SYNC flag from WRITE_{FUA|PREFLUSH|...}
> definitions. generic_make_request_checks() however strips REQ_FUA and
> REQ_PREFLUSH flags from a bio when
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 10:50:18AM +0800, Yang Feng wrote:
> Hello Christophe,
ACK
-Ben
> Our technology team is working on a open source contribution for multipath.
> We think that this patch is essential to isolate the high latency paths and
> avoid high fluctuation of io performance,
On Thu, 2017-05-18 at 15:18 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Only read bio->bi_error once in the common path.
Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche
--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
On Thu, 2017-05-18 at 15:18 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig
Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche
--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
On Thu, 2017-05-18 at 15:18 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> A few (but not all) dm targets use a special EWOULDBLOCK error code for
> failing REQ_RAHEAD requests that fail due to a lack of available resources.
> But no one else knows about this magic code, and lower level drivers also
> don't
On Thu, 2017-05-18 at 15:18 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig
Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche
--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
On Thu, 2017-05-18 at 15:17 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> We will only have sense data if the command exectured and got a SCSI
> result, so this is pointless.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig
> ---
> drivers/scsi/osd/osd_initiator.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+),
On Thu, 2017-05-18 at 15:17 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Instead of reinventing it poorly.
Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche
--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
Hi
commit cf22cd5f3a: dm crypt: add cryptographic data integrity protection
suspected to be bad.
Test : trinity
Machine : Power 8 (LPAR)
kernel : 4.12.0-rc2-next-20170523
Config : attached
Unable to handle kernel paging request for data at address 0x
Faulting instruction address:
Commit b685d3d65ac7 "block: treat REQ_FUA and REQ_PREFLUSH as
synchronous" removed REQ_SYNC flag from WRITE_{FUA|PREFLUSH|...}
definitions. generic_make_request_checks() however strips REQ_FUA and
REQ_PREFLUSH flags from a bio when the storage doesn't report volatile
write cache and thus write
On 05/24/2017 11:29 AM, Abdul Haleem wrote:
> Hi
>
> commit cf22cd5f3a: dm crypt: add cryptographic data integrity protection
> suspected to be bad.
Isn't this false positive? That commit changes only dm-crypt and that module
seems not to be even loaded...
(Moreover config has disabled block
12 matches
Mail list logo