Re: [dm-devel] [dm-crypt] [RFC PATCH 0/4] Allow file systems to selectively bypass dm-crypt

On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 09:33:39AM +0200, Milan Broz wrote: > On 06/15/2017 01:40 AM, Michael Halcrow wrote: > > Several file systems either have already implemented encryption or are > > in the process of doing so. This addresses usability and storage > > isolation requirements on mobile devices

Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH v5 1/1] multipath-tools: Prioritizer based on a latency algorithm

Hi Martin, Thanks for your reviews. Please find my replys. And the patch v6 will be sent later. Regards, Yang --- > >> +#define MAX_LATENCY_INTERVAL10/*unit: s*/ >> +#define MIN_LATENCY_INTERVAL1 /*unit: us, or ms, or s*/ > > Why not use the same unit or both

Re: [dm-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/4] Allow file systems to selectively bypass dm-crypt

On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 09:33:39AM +0200, Milan Broz wrote: > On 06/15/2017 01:40 AM, Michael Halcrow wrote: > > Several file systems either have already implemented encryption or are > > in the process of doing so. This addresses usability and storage > > isolation requirements on mobile devices