On Thu, Sep 15, 2022 at 02:56:36PM +0800, Wu Guanghao wrote:
> Sorry for the late feedback.
>
> The version we are currently testing is 0.8.4, so we only merge the
> first 3 patches in this series of patches. Then after the actual test,
> it was found that the effect improvement is not very
Hi,
little bit late reply, but as I struggled with NVMe performance
with LUKS on my recently updated notebook, I add some notes here.
It could apply for your config too, but as I sometimes see similar reports,
it is better to have it on one place (also cc dm-devel as Mikulas
helped me to debug
On Wed, 14 Sep 2022 16:55:51 -0400 (EDT), Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> There's a bug in blkdev_issue_secure_erase. The statement
> "unsigned int len = min_t(sector_t, nr_sects, max_sectors);"
> sets the variable "len" to the length in sectors, but the statement
> "bio->bi_iter.bi_size = len" treats it
