On Fri, 2017-07-14 at 18:49 +0800, Guan Junxiong wrote:
>
> I haven't seen your another patch since yesterday. So I update a new
> patch
> in the following. Does it looks good for you ? If so, I will send it
> out formally.
I've been testing my patch. Will send it ASAP.
--
Dr. Martin Wilck
Hi，Martin：
On 2017/7/13 18:04, Martin Wilck wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-07-13 at 15:47 +0800, Guan Junxiong wrote:
>> The devpath of uevent of NVMe-Fabrics device is like this
>> "../devices/virtual/nvme-fabrics/ctl/nvme0/nvme0n1" which
>> doesn't contains the "/block/" string. So when new uvents
>> of
On Thu, 2017-07-13 at 15:47 +0800, Guan Junxiong wrote:
> The devpath of uevent of NVMe-Fabrics device is like this
> "../devices/virtual/nvme-fabrics/ctl/nvme0/nvme0n1" which
> doesn't contains the "/block/" string. So when new uvents
> of such nvme devices arise, the multipathd daemon still
The devpath of uevent of NVMe-Fabrics device is like this
"../devices/virtual/nvme-fabrics/ctl/nvme0/nvme0n1" which
doesn't contains the "/block/" string. So when new uvents
of such nvme devices arise, the multipathd daemon still ignores
them, which results the DM-multipath doesn't update the
