Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH 19/57] multipathd: Do not print misleading message 'not found in pathvec'

2016-05-03 Thread Christophe Varoqui
The patch was merged as-is, so reinstating the warning, using another non-conflicting phrasing, would require a new patch. On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 7:47 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote: > On 05/02/2016 05:40 PM, Benjamin Marzinski wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 01:10:20PM +0200,

Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH 19/57] multipathd: Do not print misleading message 'not found in pathvec'

2016-05-02 Thread Hannes Reinecke
On 05/02/2016 05:40 PM, Benjamin Marzinski wrote: > On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 01:10:20PM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote: >> When looking up a path in the existing configuration it is perfectly >> possible for the path not to be present. >> This should not generate a message as it might be errorneously

Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH 19/57] multipathd: Do not print misleading message 'not found in pathvec'

2016-05-02 Thread Benjamin Marzinski
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 01:10:20PM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote: > When looking up a path in the existing configuration it is perfectly > possible for the path not to be present. > This should not generate a message as it might be errorneously > interpreted as an error. > Do you feel really

[dm-devel] [PATCH 19/57] multipathd: Do not print misleading message 'not found in pathvec'

2016-04-27 Thread Hannes Reinecke
When looking up a path in the existing configuration it is perfectly possible for the path not to be present. This should not generate a message as it might be errorneously interpreted as an error. Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke --- libmultipath/structs.c | 2 -- 1 file changed, 2