Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH v13 1/9] block: Introduce queue limits for copy-offload support

2023-07-20 Thread Christoph Hellwig
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/fs.h b/include/uapi/linux/fs.h
> index b7b56871029c..dff56813f95a 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/fs.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/fs.h
> @@ -64,6 +64,9 @@ struct fstrim_range {
>   __u64 minlen;
>  };
>  
> +/* maximum copy offload length, this is set to 128MB based on current 
> testing */
> +#define COPY_MAX_BYTES   (1 << 27)

This should not be in the UAPI.  It is a totally arbitrary internal
limit.

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel



Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH v13 1/9] block: Introduce queue limits for copy-offload support

2023-07-20 Thread Christoph Hellwig
Just a little heads up:  I think we need to properly solve the
hw vs user limit as the various ad-hoc mechanisms tend to be
broken and don't scale.  I plan to start looking into that the
next days.

On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 12:06:15AM +0530, Nitesh Shetty wrote:
> Add device limits as sysfs entries,
> - copy_offload (RW)
> - copy_max_bytes (RW)
> - copy_max_bytes_hw (RO)
> 
> Above limits help to split the copy payload in block layer.
> copy_offload: used for setting copy offload(1) or emulation(0).
> copy_max_bytes: maximum total length of copy in single payload.
> copy_max_bytes_hw: Reflects the device supported maximum limit.

Why do we need the separate copy_offload boolean vs just looking
at the max_bytes value?

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel



Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH v13 1/9] block: Introduce queue limits for copy-offload support

2023-07-10 Thread Damien Le Moal
On 6/28/23 03:36, Nitesh Shetty wrote:
> Add device limits as sysfs entries,
> - copy_offload (RW)
> - copy_max_bytes (RW)
> - copy_max_bytes_hw (RO)
> 
> Above limits help to split the copy payload in block layer.
> copy_offload: used for setting copy offload(1) or emulation(0).
> copy_max_bytes: maximum total length of copy in single payload.
> copy_max_bytes_hw: Reflects the device supported maximum limit.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke 
> Signed-off-by: Nitesh Shetty 
> Signed-off-by: Kanchan Joshi 
> Signed-off-by: Anuj Gupta 
> ---
>  Documentation/ABI/stable/sysfs-block | 33 +++
>  block/blk-settings.c | 24 +++
>  block/blk-sysfs.c| 63 
>  include/linux/blkdev.h   | 12 ++
>  include/uapi/linux/fs.h  |  3 ++
>  5 files changed, 135 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/stable/sysfs-block 
> b/Documentation/ABI/stable/sysfs-block
> index c57e5b7cb532..3c97303f658b 100644
> --- a/Documentation/ABI/stable/sysfs-block
> +++ b/Documentation/ABI/stable/sysfs-block
> @@ -155,6 +155,39 @@ Description:
>   last zone of the device which may be smaller.
>  
>  
> +What:/sys/block//queue/copy_offload
> +Date:June 2023
> +Contact: linux-bl...@vger.kernel.org
> +Description:
> + [RW] When read, this file shows whether offloading copy to a
> + device is enabled (1) or disabled (0). Writing '0' to this
> + file will disable offloading copies for this device.
> + Writing any '1' value will enable this feature. If the device
> + does not support offloading, then writing 1, will result in an
> + error.

I am still not convinced that this one is really necessary. copy_max_bytes_hw !=
0 indicates that the devices supports copy offload. And setting copy_max_bytes
to 0 can be used to disable copy offload (which probably should be the default
for now).

> +
> +
> +What:/sys/block//queue/copy_max_bytes
> +Date:June 2023
> +Contact: linux-bl...@vger.kernel.org
> +Description:
> + [RW] This is the maximum number of bytes that the block layer
> + will allow for a copy request. This will is always smaller or

will is -> is

> + equal to the maximum size allowed by the hardware, indicated by
> + 'copy_max_bytes_hw'. An attempt to set a value higher than
> + 'copy_max_bytes_hw' will truncate this to 'copy_max_bytes_hw'.
> +
> +
> +What:/sys/block//queue/copy_max_bytes_hw

Nit: In keeping with the spirit of attributes like
max_hw_sectors_kb/max_sectors_kb, I would call this one copy_max_hw_bytes.

> +Date:June 2023
> +Contact: linux-bl...@vger.kernel.org
> +Description:
> + [RO] This is the maximum number of bytes that the hardware
> + will allow for single data copy request.
> + A value of 0 means that the device does not support
> + copy offload.
> +
> +
>  What:/sys/block//queue/crypto/
>  Date:February 2022
>  Contact: linux-bl...@vger.kernel.org
> diff --git a/block/blk-settings.c b/block/blk-settings.c
> index 4dd59059b788..738cd3f21259 100644
> --- a/block/blk-settings.c
> +++ b/block/blk-settings.c
> @@ -59,6 +59,8 @@ void blk_set_default_limits(struct queue_limits *lim)
>   lim->zoned = BLK_ZONED_NONE;
>   lim->zone_write_granularity = 0;
>   lim->dma_alignment = 511;
> + lim->max_copy_sectors_hw = 0;
> + lim->max_copy_sectors = 0;
>  }
>  
>  /**
> @@ -82,6 +84,8 @@ void blk_set_stacking_limits(struct queue_limits *lim)
>   lim->max_dev_sectors = UINT_MAX;
>   lim->max_write_zeroes_sectors = UINT_MAX;
>   lim->max_zone_append_sectors = UINT_MAX;
> + lim->max_copy_sectors_hw = UINT_MAX;
> + lim->max_copy_sectors = UINT_MAX;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_set_stacking_limits);
>  
> @@ -183,6 +187,22 @@ void blk_queue_max_discard_sectors(struct request_queue 
> *q,
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_queue_max_discard_sectors);
>  
> +/**
> + * blk_queue_max_copy_sectors_hw - set max sectors for a single copy payload
> + * @q:  the request queue for the device
> + * @max_copy_sectors: maximum number of sectors to copy
> + **/
> +void blk_queue_max_copy_sectors_hw(struct request_queue *q,
> + unsigned int max_copy_sectors)
> +{
> + if (max_copy_sectors > (COPY_MAX_BYTES >> SECTOR_SHIFT))
> + max_copy_sectors = COPY_MAX_BYTES >> SECTOR_SHIFT;
> +
> + q->limits.max_copy_sectors_hw = max_copy_sectors;
> + q->limits.max_copy_sectors = max_copy_sectors;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blk_queue_max_copy_sectors_hw);
> +
>  /**
>   * blk_queue_max_secure_erase_sectors - set max sectors for a secure erase
>   * @q:  the request queue for the device
> @@ -578,6 +598,10 @@ int blk_stack_limits(struct 

Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH v13 1/9] block: Introduce queue limits for copy-offload support

2023-06-29 Thread Nitesh Shetty

On 23/06/28 03:40PM, Damien Le Moal wrote:

On 6/28/23 03:36, Nitesh Shetty wrote:

Add device limits as sysfs entries,
- copy_offload (RW)
- copy_max_bytes (RW)
- copy_max_bytes_hw (RO)

Above limits help to split the copy payload in block layer.
copy_offload: used for setting copy offload(1) or emulation(0).
copy_max_bytes: maximum total length of copy in single payload.
copy_max_bytes_hw: Reflects the device supported maximum limit.

Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke 
Signed-off-by: Nitesh Shetty 
Signed-off-by: Kanchan Joshi 
Signed-off-by: Anuj Gupta 
---
 Documentation/ABI/stable/sysfs-block | 33 +++
 block/blk-settings.c | 24 +++
 block/blk-sysfs.c| 63 
 include/linux/blkdev.h   | 12 ++
 include/uapi/linux/fs.h  |  3 ++
 5 files changed, 135 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/stable/sysfs-block 
b/Documentation/ABI/stable/sysfs-block
index c57e5b7cb532..3c97303f658b 100644
--- a/Documentation/ABI/stable/sysfs-block
+++ b/Documentation/ABI/stable/sysfs-block
@@ -155,6 +155,39 @@ Description:
last zone of the device which may be smaller.


+What:  /sys/block//queue/copy_offload
+Date:  June 2023
+Contact:   linux-bl...@vger.kernel.org
+Description:
+   [RW] When read, this file shows whether offloading copy to a
+   device is enabled (1) or disabled (0). Writing '0' to this
+   file will disable offloading copies for this device.
+   Writing any '1' value will enable this feature. If the device
+   does not support offloading, then writing 1, will result in an
+   error.


I am still not convinced that this one is really necessary. copy_max_bytes_hw !=
0 indicates that the devices supports copy offload. And setting copy_max_bytes
to 0 can be used to disable copy offload (which probably should be the default
for now).



Agreed, we will do this in next iteration.


+
+
+What:  /sys/block//queue/copy_max_bytes
+Date:  June 2023
+Contact:   linux-bl...@vger.kernel.org
+Description:
+   [RW] This is the maximum number of bytes that the block layer
+   will allow for a copy request. This will is always smaller or


will is -> is



acked


+   equal to the maximum size allowed by the hardware, indicated by
+   'copy_max_bytes_hw'. An attempt to set a value higher than
+   'copy_max_bytes_hw' will truncate this to 'copy_max_bytes_hw'.
+
+
+What:  /sys/block//queue/copy_max_bytes_hw


Nit: In keeping with the spirit of attributes like
max_hw_sectors_kb/max_sectors_kb, I would call this one copy_max_hw_bytes.



acked, will update in next iteration.


+Date:  June 2023
+Contact:   linux-bl...@vger.kernel.org
+Description:
+   [RO] This is the maximum number of bytes that the hardware
+   will allow for single data copy request.
+   A value of 0 means that the device does not support
+   copy offload.
+
+
 What:  /sys/block//queue/crypto/
 Date:  February 2022
 Contact:   linux-bl...@vger.kernel.org
diff --git a/block/blk-settings.c b/block/blk-settings.c
index 4dd59059b788..738cd3f21259 100644
--- a/block/blk-settings.c
+++ b/block/blk-settings.c
@@ -59,6 +59,8 @@ void blk_set_default_limits(struct queue_limits *lim)
lim->zoned = BLK_ZONED_NONE;
lim->zone_write_granularity = 0;
lim->dma_alignment = 511;
+   lim->max_copy_sectors_hw = 0;
+   lim->max_copy_sectors = 0;
 }

 /**
@@ -82,6 +84,8 @@ void blk_set_stacking_limits(struct queue_limits *lim)
lim->max_dev_sectors = UINT_MAX;
lim->max_write_zeroes_sectors = UINT_MAX;
lim->max_zone_append_sectors = UINT_MAX;
+   lim->max_copy_sectors_hw = UINT_MAX;
+   lim->max_copy_sectors = UINT_MAX;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_set_stacking_limits);

@@ -183,6 +187,22 @@ void blk_queue_max_discard_sectors(struct request_queue *q,
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_queue_max_discard_sectors);

+/**
+ * blk_queue_max_copy_sectors_hw - set max sectors for a single copy payload
+ * @q:  the request queue for the device
+ * @max_copy_sectors: maximum number of sectors to copy
+ **/
+void blk_queue_max_copy_sectors_hw(struct request_queue *q,
+   unsigned int max_copy_sectors)
+{
+   if (max_copy_sectors > (COPY_MAX_BYTES >> SECTOR_SHIFT))
+   max_copy_sectors = COPY_MAX_BYTES >> SECTOR_SHIFT;
+
+   q->limits.max_copy_sectors_hw = max_copy_sectors;
+   q->limits.max_copy_sectors = max_copy_sectors;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blk_queue_max_copy_sectors_hw);
+
 /**
  * blk_queue_max_secure_erase_sectors - set max sectors for a secure erase
  * @q:  the request queue for the device
@@ -578,6 +598,10 @@ int blk_stack_limits(struct queue_limits *t, struct 
queue_limits *b,

[dm-devel] [PATCH v13 1/9] block: Introduce queue limits for copy-offload support

2023-06-27 Thread Nitesh Shetty
Add device limits as sysfs entries,
- copy_offload (RW)
- copy_max_bytes (RW)
- copy_max_bytes_hw (RO)

Above limits help to split the copy payload in block layer.
copy_offload: used for setting copy offload(1) or emulation(0).
copy_max_bytes: maximum total length of copy in single payload.
copy_max_bytes_hw: Reflects the device supported maximum limit.

Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke 
Signed-off-by: Nitesh Shetty 
Signed-off-by: Kanchan Joshi 
Signed-off-by: Anuj Gupta 
---
 Documentation/ABI/stable/sysfs-block | 33 +++
 block/blk-settings.c | 24 +++
 block/blk-sysfs.c| 63 
 include/linux/blkdev.h   | 12 ++
 include/uapi/linux/fs.h  |  3 ++
 5 files changed, 135 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/stable/sysfs-block 
b/Documentation/ABI/stable/sysfs-block
index c57e5b7cb532..3c97303f658b 100644
--- a/Documentation/ABI/stable/sysfs-block
+++ b/Documentation/ABI/stable/sysfs-block
@@ -155,6 +155,39 @@ Description:
last zone of the device which may be smaller.
 
 
+What:  /sys/block//queue/copy_offload
+Date:  June 2023
+Contact:   linux-bl...@vger.kernel.org
+Description:
+   [RW] When read, this file shows whether offloading copy to a
+   device is enabled (1) or disabled (0). Writing '0' to this
+   file will disable offloading copies for this device.
+   Writing any '1' value will enable this feature. If the device
+   does not support offloading, then writing 1, will result in an
+   error.
+
+
+What:  /sys/block//queue/copy_max_bytes
+Date:  June 2023
+Contact:   linux-bl...@vger.kernel.org
+Description:
+   [RW] This is the maximum number of bytes that the block layer
+   will allow for a copy request. This will is always smaller or
+   equal to the maximum size allowed by the hardware, indicated by
+   'copy_max_bytes_hw'. An attempt to set a value higher than
+   'copy_max_bytes_hw' will truncate this to 'copy_max_bytes_hw'.
+
+
+What:  /sys/block//queue/copy_max_bytes_hw
+Date:  June 2023
+Contact:   linux-bl...@vger.kernel.org
+Description:
+   [RO] This is the maximum number of bytes that the hardware
+   will allow for single data copy request.
+   A value of 0 means that the device does not support
+   copy offload.
+
+
 What:  /sys/block//queue/crypto/
 Date:  February 2022
 Contact:   linux-bl...@vger.kernel.org
diff --git a/block/blk-settings.c b/block/blk-settings.c
index 4dd59059b788..738cd3f21259 100644
--- a/block/blk-settings.c
+++ b/block/blk-settings.c
@@ -59,6 +59,8 @@ void blk_set_default_limits(struct queue_limits *lim)
lim->zoned = BLK_ZONED_NONE;
lim->zone_write_granularity = 0;
lim->dma_alignment = 511;
+   lim->max_copy_sectors_hw = 0;
+   lim->max_copy_sectors = 0;
 }
 
 /**
@@ -82,6 +84,8 @@ void blk_set_stacking_limits(struct queue_limits *lim)
lim->max_dev_sectors = UINT_MAX;
lim->max_write_zeroes_sectors = UINT_MAX;
lim->max_zone_append_sectors = UINT_MAX;
+   lim->max_copy_sectors_hw = UINT_MAX;
+   lim->max_copy_sectors = UINT_MAX;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_set_stacking_limits);
 
@@ -183,6 +187,22 @@ void blk_queue_max_discard_sectors(struct request_queue *q,
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_queue_max_discard_sectors);
 
+/**
+ * blk_queue_max_copy_sectors_hw - set max sectors for a single copy payload
+ * @q:  the request queue for the device
+ * @max_copy_sectors: maximum number of sectors to copy
+ **/
+void blk_queue_max_copy_sectors_hw(struct request_queue *q,
+   unsigned int max_copy_sectors)
+{
+   if (max_copy_sectors > (COPY_MAX_BYTES >> SECTOR_SHIFT))
+   max_copy_sectors = COPY_MAX_BYTES >> SECTOR_SHIFT;
+
+   q->limits.max_copy_sectors_hw = max_copy_sectors;
+   q->limits.max_copy_sectors = max_copy_sectors;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blk_queue_max_copy_sectors_hw);
+
 /**
  * blk_queue_max_secure_erase_sectors - set max sectors for a secure erase
  * @q:  the request queue for the device
@@ -578,6 +598,10 @@ int blk_stack_limits(struct queue_limits *t, struct 
queue_limits *b,
t->max_segment_size = min_not_zero(t->max_segment_size,
   b->max_segment_size);
 
+   t->max_copy_sectors = min(t->max_copy_sectors, b->max_copy_sectors);
+   t->max_copy_sectors_hw = min(t->max_copy_sectors_hw,
+   b->max_copy_sectors_hw);
+
t->misaligned |= b->misaligned;
 
alignment = queue_limit_alignment_offset(b, start);
diff --git a/block/blk-sysfs.c b/block/blk-sysfs.c
index afc797fb0dfc..43551778d035 100644
--- a/block/blk-sysfs.c
+++ b/block/blk-sysfs.c
@@ -199,6